Socially Equitable Energy System Transitions
Source abstract
Abstract
Summary The European transition to a net-zero economy by 2050 implies a wide range of changes that may adversely affect certain industrial sectors, communities, and regions. However, these impacts are entirely obscured by conventional least-cost analyses. Thus, this work compares the socio-economic impacts of various strategies to decarbonize the energy system by 2050 within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We demonstrate that transitions that protect domestic strategic assets and preserve key industrial sectors correspondingly deliver a socially equitable transition. Adopting a technology-agnostic approach to decarbonizing the European electricity system maximizes the associated co-benefits and potentially increases the gross value added (GVA) to the economy by 50% relative to a business as usual scenario. This new way of thinking about the economic transition fundamentally reframes the discussion from one of cost to one of opportunity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy and Environment Impacts · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization · Global Energy and Sustainability Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Political feasibility of 1.5°C societal transformations: the role of social justice10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.002 ↗
2. Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization10.1126/science.aao3760 ↗
3. Sustainable development goals for people and planet10.1038/495305a ↗
4. Community acceptability and the energy transition: a citizens’ perspective10.1186/s13705-019-0218-z ↗
5. Negotiating energy democracy in practice: governance processes in community energy projects10.1080/09644016.2018.1427824 ↗
6. How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: a comprehensive indicator-based assessment10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.009 ↗
7. Warming assessment of the bottom-up Paris agreement emissions pledges10.1038/s41467-018-07223-9 ↗
8. The UN’s ‘sustainable energy for all’ initiative is compatible with a warming limit of 2°C10.1038/nclimate1806 ↗
9. The implications of delivering the UK’s Paris agreement commitments on the power sector10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.04.007 ↗
10. Council of European Union. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Union and of the council of 23 april 2009 (2014). http://www.nezeh.eu/assets/media/fckuploads/file/Legislation/RED/23April2009.pdf.
11. Wanted: a fair carbon tax10.1038/d41586-018-07717-y ↗
12. Rios
13. Rios
14. European decarbonisation pathways under alternative technological and policy choices: a multi-model analysis10.1016/j.esr.2013.12.007 ↗
15. Beyond 2020 — strategies and costs for transforming the european energy system10.1142/S2010007813400010 ↗
16. Towards a sustainable European energy system: linking optimization models with multi-regional input-output analysis10.1016/j.esr.2019.100391 ↗
17. Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.077 ↗
18. Spatio-temporal assessment of integrating intermittent electricity in the EU and western Balkans power sector under ambitious CO2 emission policies10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.034 ↗
19. Catching two European birds with one renewable stone: mitigating climate change and Eurozone crisis by an energy transition10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.028 ↗
20. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization10.1126/science.aah3443 ↗
21. An energy vision: the transformation towards sustainability—interconnected challenges and solutions10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.004 ↗
22. Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict10.1038/s41586-019-1300-6 ↗
23. The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7 ↗
24. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 ↗
25. Power capacity expansion planning considering endogenous technology cost learning10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.075 ↗
26. A systems approach to quantifying the value of power generation and energy storage technologies in future electricity networks10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.05.012 ↗
27. Impact of myopic decision-making and disruptive events in power systems planning10.1038/s41560-018-0159-3 ↗
28. Reducing us coal emissions can boost employment10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.004 ↗
29. Porter
30. Small-scale renewable power technologies are an alternative to reach a sustainable economic growth: evidence from Spain10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.118 ↗
31. Socio-economic and environmental effects of concentrated solar power in Spain: a multiregional input output analysis10.1016/j.solmat.2016.03.014 ↗
32. Green versus brown: comparing the employment impacts of energy efficiency, renewable energy, and fossil fuels using an input-output model10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.012 ↗
33. Internalizing the external costs of biogas supply chains in the Italian energy sector10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.033 ↗
34. 100% Clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the world10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005 ↗
35. Real-world challenges with a rapid transition to 100% renewable power systems10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.002 ↗
36. Business · 2015
37. Climate change, innovation and jobs10.3763/cpol.2008.0513 ↗
38. A response surface-based cost model for wind farm design10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.021 ↗