journal article·2023-04Open access

Technoeconomic analysis of small modular reactors decarbonizing industrial process heat

Max Vanatta, Deep Patel, Todd Allen, Daniel Cooper, Michael T. Craig

Joule· Volume 7· Issue 4

Abstract

Providing high-temperature industrial heat is a key decarbonization challenge. Nuclear small modular reactors (SMRs) could meet this decarbonization challenge, but no technoeconomic analyses of their potential exist. We quantify the technoeconomic potential of five SMR types for displacing natural gas providing process heat for 357 industrial facility processes across five US states. At 2021 US gas prices, we find no SMRs are economically viable when providing process heat alone. 28 SMR modules (5.6 GWth) and 256 modules (28.6 GWth) are economically viable at avoided gas costs of $8 and $16/MMBtu, respectively. By also participating in wholesale power markets, we find up to 113 industrial facility processes (6% of industrial demand) could be economically served by 33.9 GWth of SMRs, avoiding 4 million tons of CO2 emissions annually at 2021 US gas prices. Our analysis identifies key criteria that drive SMR economic viability, including thermal demand quantity and quality matching. Providing high-temperature industrial heat is a key decarbonization challenge. Nuclear small modular reactors (SMRs) could meet this decarbonization challenge, but no technoeconomic analyses of their potential exist. We quantify the technoeconomic potential of five SMR types for displacing natural gas providing process heat for 357 industrial facility processes across five US states. At 2021 US gas prices, we find no SMRs are economically viable when providing process heat alone. 28 SMR modules (5.6 GWth) and 256 modules (28.6 GWth) are economically viable at avoided gas costs of $8 and $16/MMBtu, respectively. By also participating in wholesale power markets, we find up to 113 industrial facility processes (6% of industrial demand) could be economically served by 33.9 GWth of SMRs, avoiding 4 million tons of CO2 emissions annually at 2021 US gas prices. Our analysis identifies key criteria that drive SMR economic viability, including thermal demand quantity and quality matching.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Summary for policymakers
2. 2022
3. 2022
4. McMillan · 2016
5. Friedmann · 2019
6. Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 207010.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848 ↗
7. McMillan · 2018
8. Status and prospect of solar heat for industrial processes in China10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.077 ↗
9. Solar process heat in industrial systems – A global review10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.065 ↗
10. Solar for industrial process heat: a review of technologies, analysis approaches, and potential applications in the United States10.1016/j.energy.2020.118083 ↗
11. Science and technology of ammonia combustion10.1016/j.proci.2018.09.029 ↗
12. Characteristics, development and utilization of geothermal resources - A Nordic perspective10.18814/epiiugs/2008/v31i1/019 ↗
13. Ibarra · 2021
14. 2021
15. Laturkar · 2022
16. Persons · 2020
17. 2021
18. 2020
19. 2021
20. Lovering · 2020
21. Boldon · 2014
22. Economic evaluation of small modular nuclear reactors and the complications of regulatory fee structures10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.043 ↗
23. The role of nuclear power in meeting current and future industrial process heat demands10.3390/en12193664 ↗
24. Grimes · 2020
25. Barnett · 1991
26. 2016
27. Moore · 2021
28. Short · 2018
29. Butcher · 2018
30. 2019
31. 2022
32. Seel · 2018
33. 2021
34. 2022
35. 2021
36. Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO210.1038/s41586-022-05224-9 ↗
37. 2022
38. Nuclear waste from small modular reactors10.1073/pnas.2111833119 ↗
39. Competitiveness of small-medium, new generation reactors: a comparative study on decommissioning10.1115/1.4000613 ↗
40. Economics and finance of small modular reactors: a systematic review and research agenda10.1016/j.rser.2019.109519 ↗
41. Huff · 2022
42. Hart · 2017 · 67
43. International Business Machines Corporation. IBM CPLEX 20.1.2021. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/icos/20.1.0
44. Kallabis · 2020
45. Day-ahead unit commitment model for microgrids10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0222 ↗
46. McMillan · 2019
47. 2022
48. 2022
49. 2022
50. Gandrik · 2012
51. Impact of modularization and site staffing on construction schedule of small and large water reactors10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111922 ↗
52. Competitiveness of small-medium, new generation reactors: A comparative study on capital and O&M costs
53. NuScale small modular reactor for Co-generation of electricity and water10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.023 ↗
54. Cox · 2020
55. Economics and finance of Molten Salt Reactors10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103503 ↗
56. 2021
57. Terrestrial Energy, National Lab, Southern Company – partnership overview using integral molten salt reactor technology with HyS acid for hydrogen production
58. 2022
59. Comparative economic analysis of the Integral Molten Salt Reactor and an advanced PWR using the G4-ECONS methodology10.1016/j.anucene.2016.09.001 ↗
60. Can nuclear power and renewables be friends?
61. 2021
62. 2001
63. Dynamics and control of molten-salt breeder reactor10.1016/j.net.2017.06.003 ↗
64. Weimar · 2021
65. Economic solution for low carbon process heat: a horizontal, compact high temperature gas reactor10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117650 ↗
66. Fletcher · 2020
67. Fuel and O&M costs estimation of high temperature gas-cooled reactors and its possibility to be implemented in Indonesia10.1088/1757-899X/536/1/012144 ↗
68. Epiney · 2017
69. 2011
70. Saving energy in industrial furnace systems
71. 2022
72. 2022
73. A comparison of price-taker and production cost models for determining system value, revenue, and scheduling of concentrating solar power plants10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.136 ↗
74. Inveno Engineering · 2019