journal article·2024-02

Salinity gradient energy is not a competitive source of renewable energy

Shihong Lin, Zhangxin Wang, Li Wang, Menachem Elimelech

Joule· Volume 8· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Salinity gradients for sustainable energy: primer, progress, and prospects10.1021/acs.est.6b03448 ↗
2. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water10.1038/nature11477 ↗
3. Directing the research agenda on water and energy technologies with process and economic analysis10.1039/D2EE03271F ↗
4. Thermodynamic and Energy Efficiency Analysis of Power Generation from Natural Salinity Gradients by Pressure Retarded Osmosis10.1021/es300060m ↗
5. Practical global salinity gradient energy potential10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.021 ↗
6. Production of Electric Power by mixing Fresh and Salt Water in the Hydroelectric Pile10.1038/174660a0 ↗
7. Water Salination: A Source of Energy10.1126/science.186.4161.350 ↗
8. Osmotic power with Pressure Retarded Osmosis: Theory, performance and trends – A review10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.053 ↗
9. Pressure retarded osmosis: From the vision of Sidney Loeb to the first prototype installation—review10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.017 ↗
10. Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO): Past experiences, current developments, and future prospects10.1016/j.desal.2015.12.008 ↗
11. Energy by reverse electrodialysis10.1016/0029-8018(80)90030-X ↗
12. Renewable energy by reverse electrodialysis10.1016/j.desal.2006.04.041 ↗
13. Recent developments and future perspectives of reverse electrodialysis technology: a review10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.021 ↗
14. 2D materials as an emerging platform for nanopore-based power generation10.1038/s41578-019-0126-z ↗
15. New avenues for the large-scale harvesting of blue energy10.1038/s41570-017-0091 ↗
16. Capacitive Mixing for Harvesting the Free Energy of Solutions at Different Concentrations10.3390/e15041388 ↗
17. Capacitive mixing power production from salinity gradient energy enhanced through exoelectrogen-generated ionic currents10.1039/C3EE43823F ↗
18. In the water dam equivalence, a 280 m water column generates hydraulic pressure of ∼27 bar which corresponds to the osmotic pressure difference between seawater and river water. If we simplify river water as salt-free with zero osmotic pressure, then 27 bar is the osmotic pressure of seawater. Having the same dimension, an osmotic pressure of 27 bar can also be converted to an energy density of 0.75 kWh m−3. Therefore, the theoretical maximum of energy density for seawater/river water SGE is 0.75 kWh per volume of the river water.
19. Thermodynamic limits of extractable energy by pressure retarded osmosis10.1039/C4EE01020E ↗
20. Module-Scale Analysis of Pressure Retarded Osmosis: Performance Limitations and Implications for Full-Scale Operation10.1021/es503790k ↗
21. Pressure-retarded osmosis for power generation from salinity gradients: is it viable?10.1039/C5EE02985F ↗
22. Osmotic power—power production based on the osmotic pressure difference between waters with varying salt gradients10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.045 ↗
23. Osmotic power—a new, renewable energy source10.5004/dwt.2010.1759 ↗
24. Limits of power production due to finite membrane area in pressure retarded osmosis10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.021 ↗
25. Viability of Harvesting Salinity Gradient (Blue) Energy by Nanopore-Based Osmotic Power Generation10.1016/j.eng.2021.02.016 ↗
26. Economic framework for net power density and levelized cost of electricity in pressure-retarded osmosis10.1016/j.desal.2018.09.007 ↗
27. Comparison of Energy Efficiency and Power Density in Pressure Retarded Osmosis and Reverse Electrodialysis10.1021/es5029316 ↗
28. Single-layer MoS2 nanopores as nanopower generators10.1038/nature18593 ↗
29. Nanofluidics for osmotic energy conversion10.1038/s41578-021-00300-4 ↗
30. Nanopore-Based Power Generation from Salinity Gradient: Why It Is Not Viable10.1021/acsnano.0c08628 ↗
31. Power generation from concentration gradient by reverse electrodialysis in ion-selective nanochannels10.1007/s10404-010-0641-0 ↗
32. Energy Efficiency of Desalination: Fundamental Insights from Intuitive Interpretation10.1021/acs.est.9b04788 ↗
33. Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis10.1016/j.desal.2019.01.003 ↗
34. Energy Consumption of Brackish Water Desalination: Identifying the Sweet Spots for Electrodialysis and Reverse Osmosis10.1021/acsestengg.0c00192 ↗
35. Extracting Renewable Energy from a Salinity Difference Using a Capacitor10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.058501 ↗
36. Direct Power Production from a Water Salinity Difference in a Membrane-Modified Supercapacitor Flow Cell10.1021/es100852a ↗
37. Gross vs. net energy: Towards a rational framework for assessing the practical viability of pressure retarded osmosis10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.035 ↗
38. River-to-sea pressure retarded osmosis: Resource utilization in a full-scale facility10.1016/j.desal.2016.01.012 ↗
39. Raising the Bar: Increased Hydraulic Pressure Allows Unprecedented High Power Densities in Pressure-Retarded Osmosis10.1021/ez400117d ↗
40. The Economic Infeasibility of Salinity Gradient Energy via Pressure Retarded Osmosis10.1021/acsestengg.1c00078 ↗
41. On the present and future economic viability of stand-alone pressure-retarded osmosis10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.001 ↗
42. The Global Rise of Zero Liquid Discharge for Wastewater Management: Drivers, Technologies, and Future Directions10.1021/acs.est.6b01000 ↗
43. A framework for blue energy enabled energy storage in reverse osmosis processes10.1016/j.desal.2021.115088 ↗
44. Large scale energy storage using multistage osmotic processes: approaching high efficiency and energy density10.1039/C6SE00013D ↗
45. Feasibility study of energy storage by concentrating/desalinating water: Concentrated Water Energy Storage10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.077 ↗
46. Energy recovery by pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) in SWRO–PRO integrated processes10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.067 ↗
47. Energy–Water Nexus Analysis of Enhanced Water Supply Scenarios: A Regional Comparison of Tampa Bay, Florida, and San Diego, California10.1021/es405648x ↗
48. Life Cycle Assessment of Water Supply Plans in Mediterranean Spain10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00271.x ↗
49. An optimization strategy for a forward osmosis-reverse osmosis hybrid process for wastewater reuse and seawater desalination: A modeling study10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.012 ↗
50. Salinity exchange between seawater/brackish water and domestic wastewater through electrodialysis for potable water10.1007/s11783-023-1616-1 ↗
51. The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment10.1126/science.1200488 ↗