journal article·2018-12Open access

Reducing US Coal Emissions Can Boost Employment

Piera Patrizio, Sylvain Leduc, Florian Kraxner, Sabine Fuss, Georg Kindermann, Sennai Mesfun, Kasparas Spokas, Alma Mendoza, Niall Mac Dowell, Elisabeth Wetterlund, Joakim Lundgren, Erik Dotzauer, Ping Yowargana, Michael Obersteiner

Joule· Volume 2· Issue 12

Abstract

Summary Concerns have been voiced that implementing climate change mitigation measures could come at the cost of employment, especially in the context of the US coal sector. However, repurposing US coal plants presents an opportunity to address emission mitigation and job creation, if the right technology change is adopted. In this study, the transformation of the US coal sector until 2050 is modeled to achieve ambitious climate targets. Results show that the cost-optimal strategy for meeting 2050 emission reductions consistent with 2°C stabilization pathways is through the early deployment of BECCS and by replacing 50% of aging coal plants with natural gas plants. This strategy addresses the concerns surrounding employment for coal workers by retaining 40,000 jobs, and creating 22,000 additional jobs by mid-century. Climate change mitigation does not have to come at the cost of employment, and policymakers could seek to take advantage of the social co-benefits of mitigation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Climate Change and Sustainable Development

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Drivers for the renaissance of coal10.1073/pnas.1422722112 ↗
2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) · 2007
3. IEA · 2016 · 28
4. Coal and energy security for India: role of carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage (CCS)10.1016/j.energy.2009.01.005 ↗
5. Natural gas use in electricity generation in the United States: outlooks to 203010.1016/j.tej.2017.01.012 ↗
6. Retraining investment for U.S. transition from coal to solar photovoltaic employment10.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.016 ↗
7. Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement10.1038/nclimate3202 ↗
8. Betting on negative emissions10.1038/nclimate2392 ↗
9. Last chance for carbon capture and storage
10. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change10.1038/nclimate3231 ↗
11. Investment opportunities exist in carbon capture market
12. The role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) for climate policy
13. Negative emissions from BioEnergy use, carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS)—the case of biomass production by sustainable forest management from semi-natural temperate forests10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00172-1 ↗
14. Research priorities for negative emissions10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/115007 ↗
15. Opinion: climate policymakers and assessments must get serious about climate engineering10.1073/pnas.1713456114 ↗
16. Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?10.1039/C7EE00465F ↗
17. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions10.1038/nclimate2870 ↗
18. Stokes, L.C., and Warshaw, C. Renewable energy policy design and framing influence public support in the United States. Nat. Energy 2, 17107,10.1038/nenergy.2017.107 ↗
19. Businesses lead where US falters10.1038/nclimate3360 ↗
20. The impact of near-term climate policy choices on technology and emission transition pathways10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.017 ↗
21. Achieving negative emissions with BECCS (bioenergy with carbon capture and storage) in the power sector: new insights from the TIAM-FR (TIMES Integrated Assessment Model France) model10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.014 ↗
22. Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 ↗
23. Uncertainty in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) deployment projections: a cross-model comparison exercise10.1007/s10584-013-1050-7 ↗
24. Uncertainty in the deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS): a sensitivity analysis to techno-economic parameter uncertainty10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.04.024 ↗
25. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.026 ↗
26. Biomass enables the transition to a carbon-negative power system across western North America10.1038/nclimate2488 ↗
27. Stranded on a low-carbon planet: implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.028 ↗
28. Carbon capture and storage across fuels and sectors in energy system transformation pathways10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.026 ↗
29. Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3 ↗
30. “Climate value at risk” of global financial assets10.1038/nclimate2972 ↗
31. 2 Degrees of Separation - Transition Risk for Oil and Gas in a Low Carbon World. (2017) https://www.carbontracker.org/reports/2-degrees-of-separation-transition-risk-for-oil-and-gas-in-a-low-carbon-world-2/.
32. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C
33. Optimal location of wood gasification plants for methanol production with heat recovery10.1002/er.1446 ↗
34. Location of a biomass based methanol production plant: a dynamic problem in northern Sweden10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.009 ↗
35. Biomethane as transport fuel – a comparison with other biogas utilization pathways in northern Italy10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.074 ↗
36. Optimal localisation of biofuel production on a European scale10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.051 ↗
37. BECCS in South Korea—analyzing the negative emissions potential of bioenergy as a mitigation tool10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.064 ↗
38. Opportunities for decarbonizing existing U.S. coal-fired power plants via CO2 capture, utilization and storage10.1021/acs.est.5b01120 ↗
39. M.J. Bradley and Associates
40. The carbon benefits of fuels and forests10.1126/science.318.5853.1066b ↗
41. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation10.1073/pnas.0710616105 ↗
42. 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the World10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005 ↗
43. Lazarus
44. Densified biomass can cost-effectively mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and address energy security in thermal applications10.1021/es202752b ↗
45. Mapping certified forests for sustainable management – a global tool for information improvement through participatory and collaborative mapping10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.014 ↗
46. IUCN · 2015 · 1
47. Design of an energy hub based on natural gas and renewable energy sources10.1002/er.3050 ↗
48. Fuel prices, emission standards, and generation costs for coal vs natural gas power plants10.1021/es4001642 ↗
49. The cost of CO2 capture and storage10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018 ↗
50. Effects of technological learning on future cost and performance of power plants with CO2 capture10.1016/j.pecs.2009.05.002 ↗
51. Power capacity expansion planning considering endogenous technology cost learning10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.075 ↗
52. Use of experience curves to estimate the future cost of power plants with CO2 capture10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00016-3 ↗