journal article·2023-07-01Open access

A systematic study of the interplay between guest molecule structure and intermolecular interactions in crystalline sponges

Robert C. Carroll, David C. Harrowven, James E. Pearce, Simon J. Coles

IUCrJ· Volume 10· Issue 4

Abstract

Utilization of the crystalline sponge {[(ZnI 2 ) 3 (tpt) 2 · x (solvent)] n } method has enabled characterization of a novel family of synthetic organic oils. The systematic structural differences and diversity of functional groups offered by 13 related molecular adsorbates provide a detailed quantitative understanding of the relationship between the guest structure, its conformation, and the type of intermolecular interactions adopted with neighbouring guests and the host framework. This analysis is extended to assess the connection of these factors to the resulting quality indicators for a particular molecular structure elucidation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Crystallography and molecular interactions · Ionic liquids properties and applications · Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Biradha · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2002 · 41 · 339510.1002/1521-3773(20020916)41:18<3395::AID-ANIE3395>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
2. Dolomanov · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2009 · 42 · 33910.1107/S0021889808042726 ↗
3. Desiraju, G. R. (1989). Crystal Engineering: The Design of Organic Solids. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Du · TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. · 2018 · 102 · 29010.1016/j.trac.2018.02.014 ↗
5. Dunitz · Chem. Eur. J. · 1997 · 3 · 8910.1002/chem.19970030115 ↗
6. Groom · Acta Cryst. B · 2016 · 72 · 17110.1107/S2052520616003954 ↗
7. Habib · Microporous Mesoporous Mater. · 2020 · 308 · 11054810.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110548 ↗
8. Hayes · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2016 · 16 · 346510.1021/acs.cgd.6b00435 ↗
9. Hayes · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2017 · 17 · 85810.1021/acs.cgd.6b01694 ↗
10. Hunter · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1990 · 112 · 552510.1021/ja00170a016 ↗
11. Inokuma · Nature · 2013 · 495 · 46110.1038/nature11990 ↗
12. Kawahata · Tetrahedron Lett. · 2016 · 57 · 463310.1016/j.tetlet.2016.09.017 ↗
13. Metherall · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2023 · 52 · 199510.1039/D2CS00697A ↗
14. Moghadam · Chem. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 261810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00441 ↗
15. Pearce, J. E. (2022). PhD thesis. University of Southampton.
16. Ramadhar · Chem. Commun. · 2015 · 51 · 1125210.1039/C5CC03840E ↗
17. Rosenberger · Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. · 2021 · 164 · 10588410.1016/j.ejps.2021.105884 ↗
18. Rosenberger · Drug Metab. Dispos. · 2020 · 48 · 58710.1124/dmd.120.091140 ↗
19. Sakurai · Chem. Eur. J. · 2017 · 23 · 1503510.1002/chem.201704176 ↗
20. Sheldrick · Acta Cryst. C · 2015 · 71 · 310.1107/S2053229614024218 ↗
21. Spek · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2003 · 36 · 710.1107/S0021889802022112 ↗
22. Taniguchi · Chem. Eur. J. · 2022 · 28 · e20210333910.1002/chem.202103339 ↗
23. Tanimoto, T. T. (1957). IBM Internal Report, 17 November. IBM, New York, USA.
24. Wada · Org. Lett. · 2021 · 23 · 928810.1021/acs.orglett.1c03660 ↗
25. Wada · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2018 · 57 · 367110.1002/anie.201713219 ↗
26. Yoshioka · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1014010.1021/jacs.6b05817 ↗
27. Zigon · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2021 · 60 · 2520410.1002/anie.202106265 ↗
28. Zigon · Angew. Chem. Int. · 2015 · Ed54 · 903310.1002/anie.201502302 ↗
29. Zigon · Chem. Asian J. · 2017 · 12 · 105710.1002/asia.201700515 ↗