journal article·2021-09-01Open access

Conformational flexibility of EptA driven by an interdomain helix provides insights for enzyme–substrate recognition

Anandhi Anandan, Nicholas W. Dunstan, Timothy M. Ryan, Haydyn D. T. Mertens, Katherine Y. L. Lim, Genevieve L. Evans, Charlene M. Kahler, Alice Vrielink

IUCrJ· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

Many pathogenic gram-negative bacteria have developed mechanisms to increase resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides by modifying the lipid A moiety. One modification is the addition of phosphoethanolamine to lipid A by the enzyme phosphoethanolamine transferase (EptA). Previously we reported the structure of EptA from Neisseria, revealing a two-domain architecture consisting of a periplasmic facing soluble domain and a transmembrane domain, linked together by a bridging helix. Here, the conformational flexibility of EptA in different detergent environments is probed by solution scattering and intrinsic fluorescence-quenching studies. The solution scattering studies reveal the enzyme in a more compact state with the two domains positioned close together in an n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside micelle environment and an open extended structure in an n-dodecyl-phosphocholine micelle environment. Intrinsic fluorescence quenching studies localize the domain movements to the bridging helix. These results provide important insights into substrate binding and the molecular mechanism of endotoxin modification by EptA.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology · Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities · Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Anandan · Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA · 2017 · 114 · 221810.1073/pnas.1612927114 ↗
2. Anaya-López · Crit. Rev. Microbiol. · 2013 · 39 · 18010.3109/1040841X.2012.699025 ↗
3. Bernadó · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 565610.1021/ja069124n ↗
4. Chipot · Chem. Rev. · 2018 · 118 · 355910.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00570 ↗
5. Cox · J. Bacteriol. · 2003 · 185 · 327010.1128/JB.185.11.3270-3277.2003 ↗
6. Dias Mirandela · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2018 · 9 · 391010.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01598 ↗
7. Durand · J. Struct. Biol. · 2010 · 169 · 4510.1016/j.jsb.2009.08.009 ↗
8. Evrard · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2011 · 44 · 126410.1107/S0021889811035758 ↗
9. Franke · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2017 · 50 · 121210.1107/S1600576717007786 ↗
10. Gasteiger, E., Hoogland, C., Gattiker, A., Wilkins, M., Appel, R. & Bairoch, A. (2005). The Proteomics Protocols Handbook, pp. 571-607. Totowa: Humana Press.10.1385/1-59259-890-0:571 ↗
11. Gimpl · Biol. Proced. Online · 2016 · 18 · 410.1186/s12575-015-0031-9 ↗
12. Hajizadeh · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 720410.1038/s41598-018-25355-2 ↗
13. Hill · Biochemistry · 1986 · 25 · 228710.1021/bi00356a065 ↗
14. Huang · Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents · 2018 · 51 · 58610.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.12.016 ↗
15. Hwang · Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA · 2004 · 101 · 961810.1073/pnas.0402324101 ↗
16. Imai · J. Biol. Chem. · 2012 · 287 · 3963410.1074/jbc.M112.401265 ↗
17. Janik · J. Clin. Microbiol. · 1976 · 4 · 7110.1128/jcm.4.1.71-81.1976 ↗
18. John · Infect. Immun. · 2012 · 80 · 401410.1128/IAI.00506-12 ↗
19. Kahler, C. M., Nawrocki, K. L., Anandan, A., Vrielink, A. & Shafer, W. M. (2018). BMC Genomics, 9, 1922.10.3389/fmicb.2018.01922 ↗
20. Kikhney · FEBS Lett. · 2015 · 589 · 257010.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.027 ↗
21. Kirby · Acta Cryst. D · 2016 · 72 · 125410.1107/S2059798316017174 ↗
22. Konarev · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2003 · 36 · 127710.1107/S0021889803012779 ↗
23. Koutsioubas · Biophys. J. · 2017 · 113 · 237310.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.003 ↗
24. Koutsioubas · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2013 · 117 · 1358810.1021/jp407688x ↗
25. Lakowicz, J. R. (2006). Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-46312-4 ↗
26. Lipfert · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 1242710.1021/jp073016l ↗
27. Lomize · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2012 · 40 · D37010.1093/nar/gkr703 ↗
28. Martínez · J. Comput. Chem. · 2009 · 30 · 215710.1002/jcc.21224 ↗
29. Mertens · J. Struct. Biol. · 2010 · 172 · 12810.1016/j.jsb.2010.06.012 ↗
30. Molodenskiy · J. Mol. Biol. · 2021 · 433 · 16688810.1016/j.jmb.2021.166888 ↗
31. Mylonas · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2007 · 40 · s24510.1107/S002188980700252X ↗
32. Panjkovich · Bioinformatics · 2018 · 34 · 194410.1093/bioinformatics/btx846 ↗
33. Pérez · Acta Cryst. D · 2015 · 71 · 8610.1107/S1399004714016678 ↗
34. Peschel · Trends Microbiol. · 2002 · 10 · 17910.1016/S0966-842X(02)02333-8 ↗
35. Petoukhov · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2012 · 45 · 34210.1107/S0021889812007662 ↗
36. Pollock · Bioconjugate Chem. · 2012 · 23 · 179410.1021/bc3000595 ↗
37. Rambo · Biopolymers · 2011 · 95 · 55910.1002/bip.21638 ↗
38. Receveur-Brechot · Curr. Protein Pept. Sci · 2012 · 13 · 5510.2174/138920312799277901 ↗
39. Ryan · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2018 · 51 · 9710.1107/S1600576717017101 ↗
40. Sengottaiyan · Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. · 2013 · 436 · 55110.1016/j.bbrc.2013.06.011 ↗
41. Svergun · J. Appl. Cryst. · 1995 · 28 · 76810.1107/S0021889895007047 ↗
42. Svergun · J. Appl. Cryst. · 1992 · 25 · 49510.1107/S0021889892001663 ↗
43. Takeshita · Gene · 1987 · 61 · 6310.1016/0378-1119(87)90365-9 ↗
44. Tria · IUCrJ · 2015 · 2 · 20710.1107/S205225251500202X ↗
45. Trombley · PLoS One · 2015 · 10 · e012437310.1371/journal.pone.0124373 ↗
46. Tzeng · J. Bacteriol. · 2002 · 184 · 237910.1128/JB.184.9.2379-2388.2002 ↗
47. Wanty · J. Mol. Biol. · 2013 · 425 · 338910.1016/j.jmb.2013.06.029 ↗
48. Whitten · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2008 · 41 · 22210.1107/S0021889807055136 ↗