journal article·2021-01-01Open access

Exploiting prior knowledge about biological macromolecules in cryo-EM structure determination

Dari Kimanius, Gustav Zickert, Takanori Nakane, Jonas Adler, Sebastian Lunz, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Ozan Öktem, Sjors H. W. Scheres

IUCrJ· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the electron-scattering potential of biological macromolecules from electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) projection images is an ill-posed problem. The most popular cryo-EM software solutions to date rely on a regularization approach that is based on the prior assumption that the scattering potential varies smoothly over three-dimensional space. Although this approach has been hugely successful in recent years, the amount of prior knowledge that it exploits compares unfavorably with the knowledge about biological structures that has been accumulated over decades of research in structural biology. Here, a regularization framework for cryo-EM structure determination is presented that exploits prior knowledge about biological structures through a convolutional neural network that is trained on known macromolecular structures. This neural network is inserted into the iterative cryo-EM structure-determination process through an approach that is inspired by regularization by denoising. It is shown that the new regularization approach yields better reconstructions than the current state of the art for simulated data, and options to extend this work for application to experimental cryo-EM data are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Goodfellow, I., Harp, A., Irving, G., Isard, M., Jia, Y., Jozefowicz, R., Kaiser, L., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Mané, D., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D., Olah, C., Schuster, M., Shlens, J., Steiner, B., Sutskever, I., Talwar, K., Tucker, P., Vanhoucke, V., Vasudevan, V., Viégas, F., Vinyals, O., Warden, P., Wattenberg, M., Wicke, M., Yu, Y. & Zheng, X. (2015). arXiv:1603.04467.
2. Adler · Inverse Probl. · 2017 · 33 · 12400710.1088/1361-6420/aa9581 ↗
3. Adler, J. & Öktem, O. (2018a). arXiv:1811.05910.
4. Adler · IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging · 2018 · 37 · 132210.1109/TMI.2018.2799231 ↗
5. Arridge · Acta Numer. · 2019 · 28 · 110.1017/S0962492919000059 ↗
6. Bendory · IEEE Signal Process. Mag. · 2020 · 37 · 5810.1109/MSP.2019.2957822 ↗
7. Berman · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2000 · 28 · 23510.1093/nar/28.1.235 ↗
8. Bigdeli, S., Honzátko, D., Süsstrunk, S. & Dunbar, L. A. (2019). arXiv:1912.09299.
9. Crowther · J. Struct. Biol. · 1996 · 116 · 910.1006/jsbi.1996.0003 ↗
10. Dempster · J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B · 1977 · 39 · 110.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x ↗
11. Dumoulin, V. & Visin, F. (2016). arXiv:1603.07285.
12. Engl, H. W., Hanke, M. & Neubauer, A. (1996). Regularization of Inverse Problems. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-1740-8 ↗
13. Fernandez-Leiro · Nature · 2016 · 537 · 33910.1038/nature19948 ↗
14. Fischer, R. F. H. (2005). Precoding and Signal Shaping for Digital Transmission. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Frank, J. (2008). Electron Tomography: Methods for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Structures in the Cell, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
16. Gatys, L. A., Ecker, A. S. & Bethge, M. (2016). 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 2414-2423. Piscataway: IEEE.
17. Gondara, L. (2016). 2016 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 241-246. Piscataway: IEEE.
18. Grant · eLife · 2018 · 7 · e3538310.7554/eLife.35383 ↗
19. Hammernik · Magn. Reson. Med. · 2018 · 79 · 305510.1002/mrm.26977 ↗
20. Henderson · J. Mol. Biol. · 2011 · 413 · 102810.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.008 ↗
21. Henderson · Structure · 2012 · 20 · 20510.1016/j.str.2011.12.014 ↗
22. Hu · Nat. Methods · 2018 · 15 · 108310.1038/s41592-018-0223-8 ↗
23. Huo, Y., Xu, Z., Bao, S., Assad, A., Abramson, R. G. & Landman, B. A. (2018). 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), pp. 1217-1220. Piscataway: IEEE.
24. Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T. & Efros, A. A. (2017). 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1125-1134. Piscataway: IEEE.
25. Iudin · Nat. Methods · 2016 · 13 · 38710.1038/nmeth.3806 ↗
26. Januszewski · bioRxiv · 2019 · 548081
27. Jifara · J. Supercomput. · 2019 · 75 · 70410.1007/s11227-017-2080-0 ↗
28. Jonić · J. Struct. Biol. · 2016 · 194 · 42310.1016/j.jsb.2016.04.007 ↗
29. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. (2014). arXiv:1412.6980.
30. Krizhevsky · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2012 · 25 · 1097
31. Lunz · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2018 · 31 · 8507
32. Mardani · IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging · 2019 · 38 · 16710.1109/TMI.2018.2858752 ↗
33. Moriya, T., Saur, M., Stabrin, M., Merino, F., Voicu, H., Huang, Z., Penczek, P. A., Raunser, S. & Gatsogiannis, C. (2017). J. Vis. Exp., 55448.
34. Parzen · Ann. Math. Stat. · 1962 · 33 · 106510.1214/aoms/1177704472 ↗
35. Penczek · Methods Enzymol. · 2010 · 482 · 110.1016/S0076-6879(10)82001-4 ↗
36. Punjani · Nat. Methods · 2017 · 14 · 29010.1038/nmeth.4169 ↗
37. Ramlaul · J. Struct. Biol. · 2019 · 205 · 3010.1016/j.jsb.2018.11.011 ↗
38. Ramlaul · J. Struct. Biol. · 2020 · 211 · 10754510.1016/j.jsb.2020.107545 ↗
39. Reehorst · IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging · 2018 · 5 · 5210.1109/TCI.2018.2880326 ↗
40. Ren · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2015 · 28 · 91
41. Romano · SIAM J. Imaging Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 180410.1137/16M1102884 ↗
42. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. (2015). Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2015, edited by N. Navab, J. Hornegger, W. M. Wells & A. F. Frangi, pp. 234-241. Cham: Springer.
43. Scheres · J. Mol. Biol. · 2012 · 415 · 40610.1016/j.jmb.2011.11.010 ↗
44. Scheres · J. Struct. Biol. · 2012 · 180 · 51910.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 ↗
45. Scheres · Nat. Methods · 2007 · 4 · 2710.1038/nmeth992 ↗
46. Scheres · J. Mol. Biol. · 2005 · 348 · 13910.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.031 ↗
47. Sigworth · J. Struct. Biol. · 1998 · 122 · 32810.1006/jsbi.1998.4014 ↗
48. Tang · J. Struct. Biol. · 2007 · 157 · 3810.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.009 ↗
49. Tegunov · bioRxiv · 2020 · 20200605136341
50. Venkatakrishnan, S. V., Bouman, C. A. & Wohlberg, B. (2013). 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, pp. 945-948. Piscataway: IEEE.
51. Wilson · Acta Cryst. · 1949 · 2 · 31810.1107/S0365110X49000813 ↗
52. Zhang · IEEE Trans. Image Process. · 2017 · 26 · 314210.1109/TIP.2017.2662206 ↗
53. Zhang · IEEE Trans. Image Process. · 2018 · 27 · 460810.1109/TIP.2018.2839891 ↗
54. Zhang, Y., Li, K., Li, K., Wang, L., Zhong, B. & Fu, Y. (2018). Computer Vision - ECCV 2018, edited by V. Ferrari, M. Hebert, C. Sminchisescu & Y. Weiss, Part VII, pp. 294-310. Cham: Springer.
55. Zhu, X., Liu, Y., Qin, Z. & Li, J. (2017). arXiv:1711.00648.