journal article·2024-11-01Open access

Using deep-learning predictions reveals a large number of register errors in PDB depositions

Filomeno Sánchez Rodríguez, Adam J. Simpkin, Grzegorz Chojnowski, Ronan M. Keegan, Daniel J. Rigden

IUCrJ· Volume 11· Issue 6

Abstract

The accuracy of the information in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) is of great importance for the myriad downstream applications that make use of protein structural information. Despite best efforts, the occasional introduction of errors is inevitable, especially where the experimental data are of limited resolution. A novel protein structure validation approach based on spotting inconsistencies between the residue contacts and distances observed in a structural model and those computationally predicted by methods such as AlphaFold 2 has previously been established. It is particularly well suited to the detection of register errors. Importantly, this new approach is orthogonal to traditional methods based on stereochemistry or map–model agreement, and is resolution independent. Here, thousands of likely register errors are identified by scanning 3–5 Å resolution structures in the PDB. Unlike most methods, the application of this approach yields suggested corrections to the register of affected regions, which it is shown, even by limited implementation, lead to improved refinement statistics in the vast majority of cases. A few limitations and confounding factors such as fold-switching proteins are characterized, but this approach is expected to have broad application in spotting potential issues in current accessions and, through its implementation and distribution in CCP 4, helping to ensure the accuracy of future depositions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Photolithography Techniques · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Afonine · Acta Cryst. D · 2023 · 79 · 68410.1107/S2059798323005077 ↗
2. Agirre · Acta Cryst. D · 2023 · 79 · 44910.1107/S2059798323003595 ↗
3. Barad · Nat. Methods · 2015 · 12 · 94310.1038/nmeth.3541 ↗
4. Brown · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2024 · 20 · 143410.1021/acs.jctc.3c01081 ↗
5. Callaway · Nature · 2020 · 578 · 20110.1038/d41586-020-00341-9 ↗
6. Casañal · Protein Sci. · 2020 · 29 · 106910.1002/pro.3791 ↗
7. Chojnowski · Acta Cryst. D · 2022 · 78 · 80610.1107/S2059798322005009 ↗
8. Chojnowski · Acta Cryst. D · 2023 · 79 · 55910.1107/S2059798323003765 ↗
9. Colovos · Protein Sci. · 1993 · 2 · 151110.1002/pro.5560020916 ↗
10. Croll · Acta Cryst. D · 2018 · 74 · 51910.1107/S2059798318002425 ↗
11. Dai · J. Mol. Biol. · 2023 · 435 · 16805910.1016/j.jmb.2023.168059 ↗
12. Davis · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2007 · 35 · W37510.1093/nar/gkm216 ↗
13. Eddy · PLoS Comput. Biol. · 2011 · 7 · e100219510.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 ↗
14. Emsley · Acta Cryst. D · 2010 · 66 · 48610.1107/S0907444910007493 ↗
15. Gao · Acta Cryst. D · 2023 · 79 · 20610.1107/S2059798322011901 ↗
16. Guasch · PLoS One · 2015 · 10 · e013456910.1371/journal.pone.0134569 ↗
17. Hekkelman, M. L. (2023). PDB-REDO/density-fitness: Application to Calculate the Density Statistics (RSR, SRSR, RSCCS, EDIAm and OPIA) for X-ray Structures. https://github.com/PDB-REDO/density-fitness.
18. Joosten · Acta Cryst. D · 2012 · 68 · 48410.1107/S0907444911054515 ↗
19. Joseph · Methods · 2016 · 100 · 4210.1016/j.ymeth.2016.03.007 ↗
20. Jumper · Nature · 2021 · 596 · 58310.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
21. Kleywegt · IUCrJ · 2024 · 11 · 14010.1107/S2052252524001246 ↗
22. Krissinel · J. Mol. Biochem. · 2012 · 1 · 76
23. Laskowski · J. Appl. Cryst. · 1993 · 26 · 28310.1107/S0021889892009944 ↗
24. Liebschner · Acta Cryst. D · 2019 · 75 · 86110.1107/S2059798319011471 ↗
25. Lüthy · Nature · 1992 · 356 · 8310.1038/356083a0 ↗
26. Mirdita · Bioinformatics · 2019 · 35 · 285610.1093/bioinformatics/bty1057 ↗
27. Murshudov · Acta Cryst. D · 2011 · 67 · 35510.1107/S0907444911001314 ↗
28. Nakamura · Nat. Methods · 2023 · 20 · 77510.1038/s41592-023-01876-1 ↗
29. Ovchinnikov · Science · 2017 · 355 · 29410.1126/science.aah4043 ↗
30. Pereira · Proteins · 2021 · 89 · 168710.1002/prot.26171 ↗
31. Pintilie · Nat. Methods · 2020 · 17 · 32810.1038/s41592-020-0731-1 ↗
32. Prisant · Protein Sci. · 2020 · 29 · 31510.1002/pro.3786 ↗
33. Reggiano · Structure · 2023 · 31 · 86010.1016/j.str.2023.05.002 ↗
34. Richardson · Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA · 1978 · 75 · 257410.1073/pnas.75.6.2574 ↗
35. Sali · Structure · 2015 · 23 · 115610.1016/j.str.2015.05.013 ↗
36. Sánchez Rodríguez · Acta Cryst. D · 2022 · 78 · 141210.1107/S2059798322010415 ↗
37. Schierholz · Mol. Biol. Evol. · 2024 · 41 · msad25410.1093/molbev/msad254 ↗
38. Simpkin · Proteins · 2023 · 91 · 161610.1002/prot.26593 ↗
39. Sippl · Proteins · 1993 · 17 · 35510.1002/prot.340170404 ↗
40. Terashi · Nat. Methods · 2022 · 19 · 111610.1038/s41592-022-01574-4 ↗
41. Thornton · Nat. Med. · 2021 · 27 · 166610.1038/s41591-021-01533-0 ↗
42. Vriend · J. Mol. Graph. · 1990 · 8 · 5210.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-V ↗
43. Vriend · J. Appl. Cryst. · 1993 · 26 · 4710.1107/S0021889892008240 ↗
44. Wehrspan · J. Mol. Biol. · 2022 · 434 · 16737710.1016/j.jmb.2021.167377 ↗
45. wwPDB Consortium · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2019 · 47 · D52010.1093/nar/gky949 ↗