Review of fatigue of bulk structural adhesives and thick adhesive joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Fatigue of structural adhesives has been investigated through joints and a little number of works investigate bulk adhesive behaviour itself. Aerospace and automotive engineering focuses more on joint configuration studies, which are correlated with practical applications. Previous works showed that for thin adhesive joints, material properties measured by bulk adhesive testing and joint testing are similar despite the triaxial stress states developing in the adhesive bondlines. However, with the introduction of structural adhesives in construction industry, thicker bondlines have emerged where the bulk adhesive material dominates the joint behaviour. This review work summarises works on the fatigue of bulk structural adhesives used mainly in the construction industry investigating structural adhesives fatigue behaviour either through experiment on joints or on bulk adhesive specimens. The work focuses on thick adhesive bondlines in joints, and discusses the controversy that is over whether adhesive properties from joints or from bulk material should be used.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Alberta
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL, Station 16
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1533/9781845690755.1.310.1533/9781845690755.1.3 ↗
2. 10.1021/ie50130a02810.1021/ie50130a028 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-1-4684-7781-810.1007/978-1-4684-7781-8 ↗
4. Brockmann W, Geiß PL, Klingen J Adhesive bonding, materials, applications and technology. Weinheim, DE: Wiley-VCH; 2009.
5. 10.1007/978-1-4613-1203-110.1007/978-1-4613-1203-1 ↗
6. Swayze DL.Adhesives — modern tool of fabrication. SAE Trans. 1946;54:412–417.
7. Adams RD, Wake WC. Structural adhesive joints in engineering. London, UK: Elsevier; 1986.
8. 10.1163/016942409X1250851739079810.1163/016942409X12508517390798 ↗
9. 10.1080/00218464.2011.53832610.1080/00218464.2011.538326 ↗
10. Hart-Smith LJ.Adhesive bonding of aircraft primary structures. SAE Trans. 1980;89(4):3718–3732.
11. Swallow JC.The plastics industry. J R Soc Arts. 1951(99);4843:335–381.
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10551210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105512 ↗
13. 10.1016/0010-4361(77)90105-710.1016/0010-4361(77)90105-7 ↗
14. 10.1520/STP27623S10.1520/STP27623S ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0054993710.1007/BF00549937 ↗
16. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90095-910.1016/0266-3538(87)90095-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.05.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.05.012 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.021 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.11.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.11.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.004 ↗
21. Abdel Wahab M.Fatigue in adhesively bonded joints: a review. ISRN Mater Sci. 2012: 746308.
22. 10.1080/00218464.2010.48430010.1080/00218464.2010.484300 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.02210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.022 ↗
24. 10.2514/1.J05817910.2514/1.J058179 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.02510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.025 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.08.04410.1016/j.msea.2007.08.044 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.12.01010.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.12.010 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.04.02210.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.04.022 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10853-009-3653-y10.1007/s10853-009-3653-y ↗
30. 10.1080/0091403720807529110.1080/00914037208075291 ↗
31. Andrews EH, Walker BJ.Fatigue fracture in polyethylene. Proc Royal Soci London. 1971;325(1560):57–79.
32. 10.1177/00219983750090020510.1177/002199837500900205 ↗
33. Stammes E, Nijssen RPL, Westphal T.Static and fatigue tests on resin for wind turbine rotor blades. 14th European Conference on Composite Materials; ECCM14, Budapest, 7–10 June, 2010.
34. 10.1007/978-94-015-7764-910.1007/978-94-015-7764-9 ↗
35. 10.1017/CBO978051152959710.1017/CBO9780511529597 ↗
36. 10.1016/0262-5075(85)90042-910.1016/0262-5075(85)90042-9 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000037210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000372 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.03.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.03.009 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000042310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000423 ↗
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(33)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(33) ↗
41. 10.1080/01694243.2016.114639210.1080/01694243.2016.1146392 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0261-3069(99)00032-110.1016/S0261-3069(99)00032-1 ↗
43. EN 1991-2 Eurocode 1. Actions on structures – Part 2: traffic loads on bridge. European committee for standardization. 2003.
44. Lahuerta F, Westphal T, Nijssen RPLStatic and fatigue performance of thick laminates test design and experimental compression results. 16th European Conference on Composite Materials; ECCM16, Seville, Spain, 22–26 June 2014.
45. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.01.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.01.010 ↗
46. Antoniou A, Vespermann M, Sayer FLife prediction analysis of thick adhesive bond lines under variable amplitude fatigue loading. 18th European Conference on Composite Materials; ECCM18, Athens, Greece, 24–28 June, 2018.
47. Sayer F, Post N, van Wingerde ATesting of adhesive joints in the wind industry. EWEC 2009, The European wind energy Conference and Exhibition; Marseille, France, 16–19 March, 2009.
48. 10.11581/DTU:0000002710.11581/DTU:00000027 ↗
49. He X.Effect of mechanical properties of adhesives on stress distributions in structural bonded joints. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2010 Vol II; WCD 2010, June 30–July 2, 2010, London.
50. ASTM D907-15. Standard terminology of adhesives. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2015.
51. ASTM D1002-10(2019). Standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading (metal-to-metal). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2019.
52. Bolger JC. Structural adhesives: today’s state of the art. In: Schneberger GL, editor. Adhesives in manufacturing. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker; 1983.
53. 10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00043-410.1016/S0143-7496(01)00043-4 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.14510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.145 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.12.00610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.12.006 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.01110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.011 ↗
57. 10.1016/0143-7496(86)90011-410.1016/0143-7496(86)90011-4 ↗
58. Adams RD, Coppendale J. The elastic moduli of structural adhesives. In: Allen W, editor. Adhesion-1. Lond: Applied Science Publishers; 1977.1: 1–17.
59. 10.1016/0143-7496(94)90018-310.1016/0143-7496(94)90018-3 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.06.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.06.005 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.02.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.02.004 ↗
62. 10.1016/0143-7496(92)90054-Y10.1016/0143-7496(92)90054-Y ↗
63. Banea MD, da Silva LFM.Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part J: J Eng Tribol. 2009;223(1):1–15.
64. 10.1007/978-94-011-3854-3_110.1007/978-94-011-3854-3_1 ↗
65. 10.1080/0021846720807221010.1080/00218467208072210 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10574310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105743 ↗
67. 10.3390/ma1011128510.3390/ma10111285 ↗
68. Bidaud P.Analysis of the cyclic behavior of an adhesive in an assembly for offshore windmills applications. Mater Université Bretagne Occidentale, HAL archives-ouvertes.fr. 2014.
69. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12500410.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125004 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.018 ↗
71. Griffin DA, Malkin MC.Lessons learned from recent blade failures: primary causes and risk-reducing Technologies. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition; 4-7 January 2011, Orlando, Florida.
72. Wetzel KK.Defect-Tolerant structural design of wind turbine blades. 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; 4–7 May 2009, Palm Springs, California.
73. Branner K Berring P. Methods for testing of geometrical down-scaled rotor blades. DTU Wind Energy. DTU Wind Energy E No. 0069 2014.
74. 10.1002/we.47010.1002/we.470 ↗
75. 10.1098/rsta.2014.007710.1098/rsta.2014.0077 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.15710.1016/j.dental.2009.11.157 ↗
77. 10.1002/adhm.20180156810.1002/adhm.201801568 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.06210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.062 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.12110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.121 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.008 ↗
81. 10.1016/B978-0-7506-1195-4.50013-010.1016/B978-0-7506-1195-4.50013-0 ↗
82. 10.1080/0021846960801520010.1080/00218469608015200 ↗
83. Vassilopoulos AP. Fatigue and fracture of adhesively-bonded composite joints. Amsterdam, NL: Woodhead Publishing; 2014.
84. Brunner AJ. Investigating the performance of adhesively-bonded composite joints: standards, test protocols and experimental design [M]. In: Vassilopoulos AP, editor. Fatigue and fracture of adhesively-bonded composite joints. Woodhead Publishing; 2014.3-42.
85. 10.1002/we.159110.1002/we.1591 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10695910.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106959 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.06.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.06.025 ↗
88. 10.1016/0013-7944(86)90071-810.1016/0013-7944(86)90071-8 ↗
89. 10.1016/0143-7496(89)90144-910.1016/0143-7496(89)90144-9 ↗
90. 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00018-610.1016/S0013-7944(98)00018-6 ↗
91. 10.1002/mawe.20100060510.1002/mawe.201000605 ↗
92. 10.1016/0013-7944(95)00150-610.1016/0013-7944(95)00150-6 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.010 ↗
94. 10.1080/0021846910802652010.1080/00218469108026520 ↗
95. Manshadi BD, Vassilopoulos AP, Botsis J.A combined experimental/numerical study of the scaling effects on mode I delamination of GFRP. Compos Struct. 2013;83:32–39.
96. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.001 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.03110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.031 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.015 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.018 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.017 ↗