4D-Printing biocompatible polymer with high mechanical performance for clear aligners
Source abstract
Abstract
Clear aligners have become a preferred orthodontic solution due to their aesthetics, comfort, and convenience. However, current aligners still suffer from poor fit caused by thermoforming-induced dimensional inaccuracies and force mismatch due to stress relaxation in thermoplastic materials. Here we address these limitations by developing a biocompatible, highly transparent polyurethane-based material (PUP) tailored for high-precision DLP printing. The PUP ink enables rapid, spatially resolved curing within 30 s and supports high-fidelity printing with feature sizes down to ~10 μm. Moreover, 4D-printed PUP aligners combine accurate fit with programmable, long-term force delivery and can be reshaped for multiple treatment stages. Notably, the representative formulation meets clear-aligner-relevant yield thresholds (yield strength > 25 MPa and yield strain > 4%), supporting stable elastic force output within a clinically meaningful deformation window. This work demonstrates a smart aligner strategy that integrates precision manufacturing with active force control through shape memory, offering a practical route toward next-generation personalized orthodontic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Lanzhou University
Chinese Academy of Science
Yantai Zhongke Research Institute of Advanced Materials and Green Chemical Engineering
Funding
Taishan Scholars Program · Key Cultivation Projects during the “15th Five-Year Plan” Period of LICP · Joint Research Fund of Gansu Province, China · The National Natural Science Foundation of China · Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences · CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.10.00610.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.10.006 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20240837610.1002/adfm.202408376 ↗
3. 10.3390/polym1712168110.3390/polym17121681 ↗
4. 10.4012/dmj.2013-13110.4012/dmj.2013-131 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.10633710.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106337 ↗
6. 10.4103/jos.jos_211_2310.4103/jos.jos_211_23 ↗
7. 10.1007/s42765-021-00073-z10.1007/s42765-021-00073-z ↗
8. 10.1080/19475411.2024.243995410.1080/19475411.2024.2439954 ↗
9. 10.1080/19475411.2024.241028910.1080/19475411.2024.2410289 ↗
10. 10.1080/19475411.2025.254029610.1080/19475411.2025.2540296 ↗
11. 10.1080/19475411.2025.259400910.1080/19475411.2025.2594009 ↗
12. 10.3390/polym1613193010.3390/polym16131930 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20200071310.1002/adma.202000713 ↗
14. 10.3390/dj903003110.3390/dj9030031 ↗
15. 10.1080/17452759.2024.236185710.1080/17452759.2024.2361857 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.10977110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109771 ↗
17. 10.1126/scirobotics.aau044910.1126/scirobotics.aau0449 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20240230110.1002/adma.202402301 ↗
19. A.S. Gladman, E.A. Matsumoto, R.G. Nuzzo, L. Mahadevan, and J.A. Lewis, Biomimetic 4d printing, Nat Mater. 15 (2016), pp. 413–419.10.1038/nmat4544 ↗
20. 10.1088/2631-7990/add81c10.1088/2631-7990/add81c ↗
21. 10.1080/19475411.2024.233264510.1080/19475411.2024.2332645 ↗
22. 10.1080/19475411.2025.245883310.1080/19475411.2025.2458833 ↗
23. 10.1080/19475411.2025.251957810.1080/19475411.2025.2519578 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2026.11555510.1016/j.matdes.2026.115555 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.11328910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113289 ↗
26. 10.1002/advs.20251309110.1002/advs.202513091 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apmt.2024.10236110.1016/j.apmt.2024.102361 ↗
28. 10.3390/polym1610139810.3390/polym16101398 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2022.10537410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2022.105374 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.08.00210.1016/j.aiepr.2023.08.002 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.10150610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101506 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.mattod.2024.06.00410.1016/j.mattod.2024.06.004 ↗
33. 10.1186/s11671-025-04230-w10.1186/s11671-025-04230-w ↗
34. 10.3390/jfb1407034710.3390/jfb14070347 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.03510.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.035 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598-025-93026-010.1038/s41598-025-93026-0 ↗
37. 10.1002/adhm.20230206310.1002/adhm.202302063 ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20231120910.1002/adfm.202311209 ↗
39. 10.1039/D4TB00593G10.1039/D4TB00593G ↗
40. 10.1007/s42114-022-00585-110.1007/s42114-022-00585-1 ↗
41. 10.1039/D2NR04691A10.1039/D2NR04691A ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1705060010.3390/polym17050600 ↗
43. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1711149810.3390/pharmaceutics17111498 ↗
44. 10.1002/adfm.20221377110.1002/adfm.202213771 ↗
45. 10.34133/research.023410.34133/research.0234 ↗
46. 10.3390/bioengineering908034910.3390/bioengineering9080349 ↗
47. 10.1186/s40510-025-00559-110.1186/s40510-025-00559-1 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41598-022-09831-410.1038/s41598-022-09831-4 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.02810.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.028 ↗
50. 10.1126/sciadv.adv464610.1126/sciadv.adv4646 ↗
51. 10.3390/app1513751610.3390/app15137516 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2025.11446010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2025.114460 ↗
53. 10.1007/s43939-025-00430-410.1007/s43939-025-00430-4 ↗
54. 10.1039/D5RA04372G10.1039/D5RA04372G ↗
55. 10.3390/bioengineering1209089810.3390/bioengineering12090898 ↗
56. Helena Reis de Souza Schacher HR, M.M. Oliveira, R. Medina-Silva, and L.M. de Menezes, In vitro Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans adhesion on clear orthodontic aligners exposed to artificial saliva, Dent Mater. 41 (2025), pp. 1332–1338.10.1016/j.dental.2025.07.015 ↗
57. M. Ferreira, H. Costa, N. Veiga, M.J. Correia, A. Gomes, and P.C. Lopes, Do clear aligners release toxic chemicals?-a systematic review, J. Funct. Biomater. 16 (2025), pp. 173.10.3390/jfb16050173 ↗