Synthesis of chemically resistant polybenzimidazole membrane via green phosphoric acid crosslinking for efficient separation of selective flavonoids from citrus waste
Source abstract
Abstract
This study introduces a chemically resilient Polybenzimidazole (PBI) thin-film composite membrane for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) based flavonoid fractionation of citrus waste, employing Phosphoric Acid (PA) as a mild, versatile, and low cost green crosslinker. The influence of crosslinking PA concentration (6, 10, 20 wt%), and time (12, 24, 48 h) on flavonoid rejection was investigated. Optimal molecular sieving occurred at 10 wt% PA, 24 h, and 25°C, yielding 80.8% rejection and correlating with significant bound PA (BPA) and negligible unbound acid. Structural characterization confirmed stable PBI-PA bonding by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis. The newly developed PBI-PA membrane exhibited remarkable chemical resistance, retaining stability against ethanolic citrus extract, reactive compounds such as limonene, and harsh organic solvents including N,N dimethylacetamide (DMAc) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). After crosslinking with PA, the fragile PBI membrane was transformed into a robust, flexible structure with a tensile strength of 7.91 ± 0.26 MPa and a permeate flux of the ethanolic citrus extract of 18.06 Lm−2h−1. These results demonstrate the potential of PBI-PA membranes to efficiently fractionate and concentrate antioxidant-rich flavonoids from citrus waste via OSN, with broader applicability for separating phytochemicals from diverse natural sources.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Extraction and Separation Processes · Membrane Separation Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Technology University of Moratuwa
University of Southern Queensland
University of Moratuwa
RMIT University
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C3GC41634H10.1039/C3GC41634H ↗
2. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.04810.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.048 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.memsci.2024.12246310.1016/j.memsci.2024.122463 ↗
4. 10.1039/D2TA00422D10.1039/D2TA00422D ↗
5. 10.3390/membranes1202014010.3390/membranes12020140 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12095110.1016/j.memsci.2022.120951 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jiec.2025.07.04810.1016/j.jiec.2025.07.048 ↗
8. 10.1002/app.5711910.1002/app.57119 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.12003710.1016/j.memsci.2021.120037 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12079510.1016/j.memsci.2022.120795 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.23436910.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234369 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.05610.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.056 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.06910.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.069 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12103910.1016/j.memsci.2022.121039 ↗
15. 10.1039/D4SU00027G10.1039/D4SU00027G ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12038310.1016/j.memsci.2022.120383 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11770210.1016/j.seppur.2020.117702 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.08110.1016/j.desal.2007.01.081 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7EE02865B10.1039/C7EE02865B ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jff.2022.10516310.1016/j.jff.2022.105163 ↗
21. 10.3389/fnut.2022.96860410.3389/fnut.2022.968604 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.13058510.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130585 ↗
23. 10.3390/membranes1203033910.3390/membranes12030339 ↗
24. 10.3390/membranes1207066910.3390/membranes12070669 ↗
25. 10.1002/fsn3.288810.1002/fsn3.2888 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11947-020-02558-y10.1007/s11947-020-02558-y ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14002510.1016/j.cej.2022.140025 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.10156510.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101565 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.07.00510.1016/j.seppur.2005.07.005 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11694-018-9974-210.1007/s11694-018-9974-2 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.08.04010.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.08.040 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.07410.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.074 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.11610.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.116 ↗
34. 10.1002/polb.2340310.1002/polb.23403 ↗
35. J. Mader, Polybenzimidazole/acid complexes as high-temperature membranes, Fuel Cells II (2008), pp. 63–124.
36. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.22310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.223 ↗
37. 10.1039/c1jm12857d10.1039/c1jm12857d ↗
38. 10.3390/polym1206137410.3390/polym12061374 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12175110.1016/j.seppur.2022.121751 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.11193210.1016/j.lwt.2021.111932 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.02.01310.1016/j.ssi.2004.02.013 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.fbp.2012.07.00510.1016/j.fbp.2012.07.005 ↗
43. 10.3390/min1002017810.3390/min10020178 ↗
44. 10.3762/bjnano.6.810.3762/bjnano.6.8 ↗
45. 10.1039/C7EE02865B10.1039/C7EE02865B ↗
46. 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.00510.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.005 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.12147410.1016/j.memsci.2023.121474 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.21210.1016/j.cej.2019.05.212 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.00810.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.008 ↗
50. 10.1039/C5RA27044H10.1039/C5RA27044H ↗
51. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.02610.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.026 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.05610.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.056 ↗
53. 10.1021/ie502626s10.1021/ie502626s ↗
54. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.03510.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.035 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.15210.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.152 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.04.02010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.04.020 ↗
57. 10.3390/foods911164910.3390/foods9111649 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10395110.1016/j.jece.2020.103951 ↗
59. 10.15255/CABEQ.2014.200610.15255/CABEQ.2014.2006 ↗
60. 10.3390/membranes1302011910.3390/membranes13020119 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.01810.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.018 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11790710.1016/j.memsci.2020.117907 ↗
63. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0424510.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04245 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12239610.1016/j.seppur.2022.122396 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.14600910.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146009 ↗
66. E.P.O.F. Additives, Re‐evaluation of phosphoric acid–phosphates–di‐, tri‐and polyphosphates (E 338–341, E 343, E 450–452) as food additives and the safety of proposed extension of use, EFSA J. 17 (2019), pp. e05674.