Fused filament fabrication of polypropylene: Influence of the bead temperature on adhesion and porosity
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The mechanical properties of the parts produced using fused filament fabrication (FFF) strongly depend on the adhesion strength between beads (FA), which substantially depends on the temperature of the polypropylene (PP) beads during their deposition. In this work, the temperature of the beads was controlled through the adjustment of the nozzle temperature (Tn) and the manufacturing chamber temperature (Tch) in order to control respectively the PP temperature at the nozzle end and the cooling of the PP beads after their deposition. SEM observations revealed an improvement of the coalescence between overlayed beads of different layers and between adjacent beads in the same layer with the increase in Tn. The increase of Tch promotes mainly the coalescence between adjacent beads within the layer. These observations were confronted with uniaxial tensile tests based on a Mode III fracture experiment allowed quantifying the influence of Tn and Tch on the adhesion strength between overlayed beads of different layers. Results reveals a weak increase in FA caused by the increase in the manufacturing chamber temperature from 80 °C to 100 °C, while an increase in the nozzle temperature from 170 °C to 180 °C causes a 145% FA increase. In the same time, this decrease in the manufacturing chamber temperature causes an important increase in porosity and a substantial decrease in the adhesion strength between layers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. A review of additive manufacturing10.5402/2012/208760 ↗
2. The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
3. The barriers to the progression of additive manufacture: perspectives from UK industry10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.003 ↗
4. Mechanical behaviour of ABS: an experimental study using FFF and injection moulding techniques10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.11.002 ↗
5. Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS10.3390/ma8095271 ↗
6. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS10.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
7. A benchmark study on rapid prototyping processes and machines: Quantitative comparisons of mechanical properties, accuracy, roughness, speed, and material cost10.1243/09544054JEM724 ↗
8. M. Montero , S. Roundy , D. Odell , S.-H. Ahn , P.K. Wright , Material Characterization of Fused Deposition Modeling (FFF) ABS by Designed Experiments, 2001. http://ode11.com/publications/sme_rp_2001.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2019).
9. Investigation of influence of heat treatment on mechanical strength of FFF printed 3D objects10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0131 ↗
10. Investigation of the mechanical properties and porosity relationships in fused deposition modelling‐fabricated porous structures10.1108/13552540610652447 ↗
11. Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909 ↗
12. Investigating the effect of fabrication temperature on mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts using X-ray computed tomography10.1007/s00170-018-2664-8 ↗
13. Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples10.1080/10426910008912976 ↗
14. Effects of nozzle temperature and building orientation on mechanical properties and microstructure of PEEK and PEI printed by 3D-FDM10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105948 ↗
15. Influence of printing conditions on structure in FFF prototypes | Utjecaj uvjeta tiskanja na strukturu FFF prototipova
16. Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling
17. Mechanical strength of welding zones produced by polymer extrusion additive manufacturing
18. Interfacial bonding during multi-material fused deposition modeling (FFF) process due to inter-molecular diffusion10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.029 ↗
19. Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053 ↗
20. Polypropylene/cellulose composites for material extrusion additive manufacturing10.1002/mame.201800037 ↗
21. Shrinkage and warpage optimization of expanded-perlite-filled polypropylene composites in extrusion-based additive manufacturing10.1002/mame.201700143 ↗
22. Optimisation of the adhesion of Polypropylene-based materials during extrusion-based additive manufacturing10.3390/polym10050490 ↗
23. Additive manufacturing of poly(propylene) by means of melt extrusion10.1002/mame.201600259 ↗
24. Rheology of high melt strength polypropylene for additive manufacturing10.5185/amlett.2017.1450 ↗
25. 3D printing of natural fibre reinforced recycled polypropylene
26. Effect of fused layer modeling (FLM) processing parameters on impact strength of cellular polypropylene10.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.055 ↗
27. Spray-dried cellulose nanofibril-reinforced polypropylene composites for extrusion-based additive manufacturing: nonisothermal crystallization kinetics and thermal expansion10.3390/jcs2010007 ↗
28. Cranial polypropylene implants by fused filament fabrication10.1002/adem.201600676 ↗
29. Additive manufacturing of metal components with the ARBURG plastic freeforming process10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.104 ↗
30. ASTM Standard D1938–02 , A.S. D1938–02, ASTM Standard D1938–02, Tear-Propagation Resistance of Plastic Film and Thin Sheeting by a Single-Tear Method, ASTM Int. West Conshohocken, PA. 2002, 5–8. doi:10.1520/D1922–15.2.
31. Mechanical property of FFF printed ABS: influence of printing parameters10.1007/s00170-019-03313-0 ↗
32. Influence of processing and orientation print effects on the mechanical and thermal behavior of 3D-Printed ULTEM ® 9085 material
33. Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗