journal article·2017-01-02Open access

Crack monitoring using multiple smart materials; fiber-optic sensors & piezo sensors

Muneesh Maheshwari, Venu G. M. Annamdas, John H. L. Pang, Anand Asundi, Swee C. Tjin

Abstract

This article focuses on health monitoring of structures using multiple smart materials. In this research, two fiber-optic sensors, namely fiber Bragg grating (FBG) and fiber-optic polarimetric sensor (FOPS), are investigated for damage detection in the beam specimen. FBG is used for local strain measurement while FOPS is used for global strain measurement. Both FBG and FOPS show significant changes in the strain due to damages in the specimen. Also, at the center of the specimen, piezoelectric wafer active sensor (PWAS) is attached. The electromechanical admittance (EMA) signature of the specimen beam is recorded by PWAS. The changes in the amplitudes of the peaks obtained at various frequencies in this EMA signature are analyzed, and it is shown that the peak amplitudes respond differently to damages and to change in loading. Thus, multiple smart materials (FBG, FOPS, and PWAS) are used to get improved information on the health of the beam.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0964-1726/12/1/31710.1088/0964-1726/12/1/317 ↗
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/4/03210.1088/0964-1726/16/4/032 ↗
3. Zhao G. · Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw · 2013 · 2013 · 110.1155/2013/469076 ↗
4. 10.1155/2010/72496210.1155/2010/724962 ↗
5. Udd E. · 1990
6. Krohn D.A. · 1998
7. Selvarajan A. · J. Non-Destructive Eval · 1995 · 15 · 41
8. 10.1061/9780872628953.ch0610.1061/9780872628953.ch06 ↗
9. 10.1117/12.20775310.1117/12.207753 ↗
10. Raymond M.M. · 2001
11. Maheshwari M. · Proc. SPIE · 2013 · 8793 · G1
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.07.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2008.07.027 ↗
13. 10.1364/OE.18.02648410.1364/OE.18.026484 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/2/30210.1088/0964-1726/10/2/302 ↗
15. 10.1088/0964-1726/8/5/30310.1088/0964-1726/8/5/303 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.11.02310.1016/j.optlastec.2014.11.023 ↗
17. 10.1177/1045389X0607552310.1177/1045389X06075523 ↗
18. 10.1177/1045389X1243788810.1177/1045389X12437888 ↗
19. 10.1016/0924-4247(92)80096-L10.1016/0924-4247(92)80096-L ↗
20. 10.1177/1045389X920030010910.1177/1045389X9200300109 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:100992662355110.1023/A:1009926623551 ↗
22. 10.1106/8BFB-GC8P-XQ47-YCQ010.1106/8BFB-GC8P-XQ47-YCQ0 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-3-662-04732-3_510.1007/978-3-662-04732-3_5 ↗
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/4/03210.1088/0964-1726/16/4/032 ↗
25. Yang Y. · Proc. SPIE · 2009 · 7292 · 1
26. 10.3390/s801027110.3390/s8010271 ↗
27. 10.1109/50.61837710.1109/50.618377 ↗
28. Maheshwari M. · Proc. SPIE · 2015 · 9431 · 1
29. 10.1117/12.20826110.1117/12.208261 ↗
30. 10.1177/1045389X940050010210.1177/1045389X9400500102 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11340-006-8734-010.1007/s11340-006-8734-0 ↗