Biocomposites: Their multifunctionality
Source abstract
Abstract
During the last decade, tissue engineering has shown a considerable promise in providing more viable alternatives to surgical procedures for harvested tissues, implants and prostheses. Due to the fast development on nano- and biomaterial technologies, it is now possible for doctors to use patients' cells to repair orthopaedic defects such as focal articular cartilage lesions. In order to support the three-dimensional tissue formation, scaffolds made by biocompatible and bioresorbable polymers and composite materials, for providing temporary support of damaged body and cell structures, have been developed recently. Although ceramic and metallic materials have been widely accepted for the development of implants, their non-resorbability and necessity of second surgical operation (like for bone repair), which induce extra pain for the patients, limit their wide applications. The development of different types of biocomposites for biomedical engineering applications is described. These biocomposites include (i) basic biomaterials; (ii) natural fiber-reinforced biocomposites and (iii) nanoparticle-reinforced biocomposites. Their multifunctionality is discussed in terms of the control of mechanical properties, biodegradability and bioresorbability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
a Centre of Excellence in Engineered Fibre Composites , Faculty of Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland , Queensland, Australia
b Department of Mechanical Engineering , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Darling E.M. · 2004
2. Wimmer M.A. · Tissue Eng. · 2004 · 9 · 143610.1089/ten.2004.10.1436 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00126-510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00126-5 ↗
4. O'Driscoll S. · J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. · 1998 · 80 · 179510.2106/00004623-199812000-00011 ↗
5. 10.1302/0301-620X.79B5.727810.1302/0301-620X.79B5.7278 ↗
6. 10.1053/joca.2002.085910.1053/joca.2002.0859 ↗
7. Dounchis J.S. · Clin. Orthop. · 2000 · 377 · 24810.1097/00003086-200008000-00033 ↗
8. Mizuno K.
9. Nam Y.S. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 1999 · 810.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199910)47:1<8::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.016 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msec.2005.01.00910.1016/j.msec.2005.01.009 ↗
13. 10.1038/418741a10.1038/418741a ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.00410.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.004 ↗
15. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981219)70:12<2439::AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981219)70:12<2439::AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
16. Atkins E. · Nature · 2003 · 424 · 101010.1038/4241010a ↗
17. Fraser R.D.B. · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 1996 · 19 · 20710.1016/0141-8130(96)01129-4 ↗
18. Annamaria S. · Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation · 1998 · 42 · 20310.1016/S0964-8305(98)00050-X ↗
19. Ishikawa H. · Sen'I Gakkaishi · 1987 · 43 · 28310.2115/fiber.43.6_283 ↗
20. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991209)74:11<2571::AID-APP2>3.0.CO;2-A10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991209)74:11<2571::AID-APP2>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
21. 10.1002/app.117210.1002/app.1172 ↗
22. Katori S. · 2002 · 97
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.023 ↗
24. Cheung H.Y. · Composites Part B: Eng. · 2008 · 36 · 102610.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.009 ↗
25. Environment Hong Kong · 2005
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.044 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.10.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.10.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.00610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.006 ↗