The impact of radicals in cold atmospheric plasma on the structural modification of gap junction: a reactive molecular dynamics study
Source abstract
Abstract
Cold atmospheric plasmas are currently gaining increasing attention for cancer therapy. However, very limited studies regarding the interaction mechanisms between plasma species and tissues are available. We report the interaction of plasma produced species ( ∗OH and HO2∗) with gap junction by employing reactive molecular dynamics simulations. Our results indicate ∗OH and HO2∗ radicals can chemically react with N-terminal of gap junction resulting in its structural damage. There are two breaking mechanisms being identified: C-N peptide bonds and C-C bonds can be damaged by ∗OH and HO2∗ radicals, respectively. Our findings could be particularly important for understanding the plasma-generated reactive species triggering bystander effect based on gap junction intercellular communication.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasma Applications and Diagnostics · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0963-0252/11/4/30410.1088/0963-0252/11/4/304 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41598-017-12454-910.1038/s41598-017-12454-9 ↗
3. 10.1109/TRPMS.2017.276119210.1109/TRPMS.2017.2761192 ↗
4. 10.1002/ppap.v5:610.1002/ppap.v5:6 ↗
5. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/11/11501210.1088/1367-2630/11/11/115012 ↗
6. 10.1038/bjc.2011.38610.1038/bjc.2011.386 ↗
7. 10.1088/0963-0252/24/3/03300110.1088/0963-0252/24/3/033001 ↗
8. 10.1002/ppap.20160008610.1002/ppap.201600086 ↗
9. 10.1088/0022-3727/45/26/26300110.1088/0022-3727/45/26/263001 ↗
10. 10.1116/1.496213010.1116/1.4962130 ↗
11. 10.1371/journal.pone.004921510.1371/journal.pone.0049215 ↗
12. 10.1038/nrc127710.1038/nrc1277 ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.080418610510.1073/pnas.0804186105 ↗
14. 10.1186/2041-9414-1-1310.1186/2041-9414-1-13 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cpme.2014.11.00110.1016/j.cpme.2014.11.001 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.93.5.183110.1073/pnas.93.5.1831 ↗
17. 10.3109/0265673930906147810.3109/02656739309061478 ↗
18. Beyer E.C. · Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (Bba)-Biomembranes · 1823 · 2012 · 1818
19. 10.1073/pnas.070370410410.1073/pnas.0703704104 ↗
20. 10.1080/1541906080201358810.1080/15419060802013588 ↗
21. 10.1038/nature0786910.1038/nature07869 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.04210.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.042 ↗
23. 10.1021/jp004368u10.1021/jp004368u ↗
24. 10.1021/jp709896w10.1021/jp709896w ↗
25. 10.1021/jp108642r10.1021/jp108642r ↗
26. 10.1088/1367-2630/17/10/10300510.1088/1367-2630/17/10/103005 ↗
27. 10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/09304310.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093043 ↗
28. 10.1088/0022-3727/47/2/02520510.1088/0022-3727/47/2/025205 ↗
29. Thompson M.A. · 2004
30. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.487965710.1063/1.4879657 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.499688610.1063/1.4996886 ↗
33. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
34. 10.1080/0026897840010120110.1080/00268978400101201 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.44733410.1063/1.447334 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.119610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1196 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.32869310.1063/1.328693 ↗
39. 10.1021/jp312851610.1021/jp3128516 ↗
40. 10.1038/srep1946610.1038/srep19466 ↗
41. 10.3390/cancers906006110.3390/cancers9060061 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.06.01310.1016/j.tibtech.2017.06.013 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.503435510.1063/1.5034355 ↗
44. 10.1615/PlasmaMed.v8.i210.1615/PlasmaMed.v8.i2 ↗
45. 10.1023/A:102732851093110.1023/A:1027328510931 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.55573910.1063/1.555739 ↗
47. 10.3390/ijms1703032710.3390/ijms17030327 ↗
48. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr30410.1093/eurheartj/ehr304 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.726010.1103/PhysRevB.58.7260 ↗
50. 10.1021/ct100684s10.1021/ct100684s ↗