Effects of boron content on the microstructure and properties of BxC-TiB2 (x=4.5, 6.5 or 8.5) ceramic composites by the reactive spark plasma sintering
Source abstract
Abstract
BxC-TiB2 ceramic composites were fabricated via reactive spark plasma sintering using TiC and B as the raw materials. The impact of B/TiC mole ratios on the phase compositions, densification behaviors, microstructure, and mechanical properties of the ceramic composites were investigated. The results showed that the stoichiometry of ‘BxC’ could be tailored by changing initial boron content and the obtained B4.5C, B6.5C and B8.5C phases have the same crystal structure (R-3 m). The excess of B enhanced the reaction between TiC and B, which released a large amount of hot energy and promoted the densification of the composites. The TB8.5 composite sintered at 1900°C had the best comprehensive mechanical properties, with hardness and flexural strength of 40.36 GPa and 551 MPa, respectively. The formation of nano-sized TiB2 grains induced by reaction were beneficial for improving the mechanical properties of these composites.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, PR China
Engineering Research Center of High-Performance Copper Alloy Materials and Processing, Ministry of Education, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, Changsha, PR China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Central Universities of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0955-2219(90)90048-K10.1016/0955-2219(90)90048-K ↗
2. 10.1179/095066009X1250672166521110.1179/095066009X12506721665211 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04865.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04865.x ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.04.02410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.04.024 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.05810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.058 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.02.03610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.02.036 ↗
7. 10.1111/jace.1348310.1111/jace.13483 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:101992711900110.1023/A:1019927119001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.25110.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.251 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.03.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.03.035 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0263-4368(96)00012-110.1016/S0263-4368(96)00012-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.02210.1016/j.msea.2010.10.022 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.32010.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.320 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14129410.1016/j.msea.2021.141294 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.10110.1016/j.msea.2010.07.101 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.04.00110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.04.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.17410.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.174 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.10530710.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105307 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.02110.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.021 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10866210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108662 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.02310.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.023 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.04110.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.041 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.10.01810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.10.018 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.02910.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.029 ↗
25. 10.1111/jace.1228410.1111/jace.12284 ↗
26. 10.1016/0364-5916(85)90021-510.1016/0364-5916(85)90021-5 ↗