journal article·2020-01

Abrasive wear characteristics of complex carbides overlay (CCO) in comparison to low-alloy boron steels

Pedro Augusto Ramos, Pedro Paiva Brito, Carlos Eduardo dos Santos, Leonardo Vieira, Ernane Rodrigues da Silva

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The aim of present study was to evaluate the abrasive wear resistance of complex carbide overlay plates in comparison to low alloy boron steels of different hardness grades. These materials are typical in mining, trasportation and crushing aplications worldwide. The abrasive wear resistance was evaluated by weight loss using a dry sand-rubber wheel laboratory abrasion test that exposed the materials to slidding abrasion. All tests were performed under dry conditions at room temperature. In order to evaluate the tribological response of the different steels and their wear mechanisms, post-characterization of the worn surfaces was performed by SEM/EDX. To better understand the wear process, microstructural SEM/EDX and microhardness analyses were performed as well. The results showed that abrasive wear performance was determined by a combination of high hardness and toughness (fracture strain). The dry sand-rubber wheel using quartz sand with 1100 HV causes severe damage in low alloy boron steels plates due to transition between cutting and plastic deformation. By applying the described methodology it was possible to establish performance comparisons and wear behavior due to individual material features according field applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Abrasive wear characteristics of selected low-alloy boron steels as measured in both field experiments and laboratory tests10.1016/j.wear.2015.02.003 ↗
2. Railroad, Product Brochure, 2016. (Avaliable at: . Acess on: 08 jan 2018).
3. Abrasive wear resistance of some commercial abrasion resistant steels evaluated by laboratory test methods10.1016/j.wear.2009.08.005 ↗
4. Abrasive wear mechanisms and their relation to rock properties10.1016/j.wear.2013.10.005 ↗
5. Jost · 1966
6. Rabinowicz · 1966
7. Zum Ghar · 1987 · 560p
8. Wear behaviour of hardfacing deposits on cast iron10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00101-7 ↗
9. Effects of composition and microstructure on the abrasive wear performance of quenched wear resistant steels10.1016/j.wear.2014.06.003 ↗
10. SSAB. Data sheet 168en Hardox 450. 2013. Avaliable at: . Acess on: 13 abril 2017.
11. Comparison of laboratory abrasion tests and field tests of materials used in tillage equipment
12. The effect of microstructure on abrasive wear of hardfacing alloys10.1016/j.wear.2005.03.002 ↗
13. Laboratory abrasive wear tests: investigation of test methods and alloy correlation10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00042-3 ↗
14. Simulation of abrasion to WC/Co hardmetals using a micro-tribology test system10.1016/j.wear.2012.11.057 ↗
15. The sliding of rigid cones over metals in high adhesion conditions10.1016/0020-7403(70)90102-5 ↗
16. Prediction of wear rates in comminution equipment10.1016/j.wear.2010.05.007 ↗
17. Effect of cold deformation on the abrasive resistance of coatings with applications in the mining industry10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00626-3 ↗
18. H.-X. Chen, Z.-C. Chang, J.-C. Lu, H.-T. Lin, Effect of niobium on wear resistance of 15% Cr white cast iron, Wear 166 (1993) 197–201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(93)90262-K.10.1016/0043-1648(93)90262-K ↗
19. Wear behaviour of hardfaced Fe-Cr-C alloy and austenitic steel under 2-body and 3-body conditions at elevated temperature10.1016/j.triboint.2010.01.008 ↗