Supermacroporous hybrid polymeric cryogels for efficient removal of metallic contaminants and microbes from water
Source abstract
Abstract
A supermacroporous cryogel column of chitosan-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA)-magnetite has been synthesized. The cationic and magnetic properties of chitosan/DMAEMA and magnetite, respectively, allow the adhesion of metals and microbes to the matrix. The large interconnected pores (20–100 µm) with porosity greater than 85% of the cryogels facilitate fast water movement. At lab scale (approximately 2 mL bed volume), static binding capacity of 100% (load: 4.5 ppm arsenic and 2300 ppm chromium) and dynamic binding capacity of 65% for arsenic (load: 58 ppm) was observed. The binding capacity at pilot scale (approximately 300 mL bed volume) was found to be 11.5 mg arsenic and 14.22 mg chromium. There was 100% binding of microbes (Escherichia coli and Streptococci) both at lab and pilot scale. The results were propitious and indicated the suitability of cryogel filter as a single device for the removal of arsenic, chromium, and microbes in field samples.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Arsenic contamination and mitigation · Fecal contamination and water quality · Membrane Separation Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.envint.2009.01.00510.1016/j.envint.2009.01.005 ↗
2. Prüss-Üstün A.
3. 10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-510.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.02310.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.023 ↗
5. Knobeloch L. M. · J. Health Popul. Nutr · 2011 · 24 · 206
6. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.10014310.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100143 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.envint.2009.01.01110.1016/j.envint.2009.01.011 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10661-011-2407-x10.1007/s10661-011-2407-x ↗
9. 10.1016/j.envint.2003.09.00910.1016/j.envint.2003.09.009 ↗
10. Öhlander B. · Geochemistry · 2012 · 12 · 303
11. 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.03.00410.1016/j.biortech.2004.03.004 ↗
12. 10.1080/1093452070179663010.1080/10934520701796630 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.00610.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.02310.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.023 ↗
15. 10.1023/A:101638690261110.1023/A:1016386902611 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.01210.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.012 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.00410.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.06410.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.064 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70202-910.1016/S1369-7021(10)70202-9 ↗
20. 10.1070/RC2002v071n06ABEH00072010.1070/RC2002v071n06ABEH000720 ↗
21. 10.1080/0149639060112049010.1080/01496390601120490 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.10210.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.102 ↗
23. 10.1080/00914037.2012.67081610.1080/00914037.2012.670816 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.01.03810.1016/j.dyepig.2006.01.038 ↗
25. 10.1163/156856209X44432110.1163/156856209X444321 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10856-008-3504-410.1007/s10856-008-3504-4 ↗
27. 10.1002/bit.2023610.1002/bit.20236 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.12.07410.1016/j.chroma.2012.12.074 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.11.00410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.11.004 ↗
30. 10.1098/rsif.2010.045510.1098/rsif.2010.0455 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.05710.1016/j.msea.2007.03.057 ↗
32. Sharma A. · BioMed Res. Int · 2013 · 2013
33. 10.1007/s10311-007-0097-y10.1007/s10311-007-0097-y ↗
34. 10.1021/ed071p32310.1021/ed071p323 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.pep.2008.04.00910.1016/j.pep.2008.04.009 ↗
36. 10.1039/b510010k10.1039/b510010k ↗
37. Budnyak T. · Mater. Sci · 2014 · 20 · 177
38. 10.1007/s00396-006-1611-710.1007/s00396-006-1611-7 ↗
39. 10.1080/00914037.2012.66420710.1080/00914037.2012.664207 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01114-710.1016/S0021-9673(02)01114-7 ↗