A hybrid physics-based and data-driven approach for characterizing porosity variation and filament bonding in extrusion-based additive manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The application of additive manufacturing technology has recently shifted from the fabrication of prototypes to functional end-use products. Consequently, the mechanical strength of products has become of significant importance. To quantify the global and local mechanical strength, it is necessary to characterize the micro-structures and their variation within the product. The extent of bonding between adjacent filaments, both within and between layers, as well as porosity are two of the most important parameters that directly contribute to the mechanical strength of parts in extrusion-based additive manufacturing. However, most of the existing models in the literature either significantly underestimate these parameters or fail to quantify or address their variation along the deposition path and build direction. Hence, in this paper, a hybrid physics-based and data-driven approach is proposed to quantify the extent of filament bonding, porosity, and their distribution within a geometry of interest by characterizing the temperature profile of filaments and their deformation. The proposed models for inter-layer and intra-layer bonding have an average accuracy of 95% and 94%, respectively. In addition, it is observed that the porosity variation model performs better for top layers compared to bottom layers with an average of 51% higher accuracy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendations10.1115/1.4028725 ↗
2. Anisotropic properties of directed energy deposition (DED)-processed Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.020 ↗
3. Study of the relationship between dimensional performance and manufacturing cost in fused deposition modeling10.1108/RPJ-11-2016-0177 ↗
4. Theoretical modeling and prediction of surface roughness for hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing processes10.1080/24725854.2018.1458268 ↗
5. Joint asymmetric tolerance design and manufacturing decision making for additive manufacturing processes10.1109/TASE.2018.2879719 ↗
6. ASTM · 2015
7. Composite modeling and analysis for fabrication of FDM prototypes with locally controlled properties10.1016/S1526-6125(02)70139-4 ↗
8. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
9. Process–structure–properties in polymer additive manufacturing via material extrusion: a review
10. Influence of printing parameters on the stability of deposited beads in fused filament fabrication of poly(lactic) acid
11. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS10.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
12. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
13. Characterization of process–deformation/damage property relationship of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D-printed specimens
14. Process-structure-property effects on ABS bond strength in fused filament fabrication
15. Deposition strategies and resulting part stiffnesses in fused deposition modeling10.1115/1.2830582 ↗
16. Characterization of the mesostructure of fused-deposition acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene materials10.1108/13552540010337056 ↗
17. Investigation of 3D non-random porous structures by fused deposition modelling10.1007/s001700200016 ↗
18. Mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene fused deposition materials modeling10.1108/13552540310489604 ↗
19. Development of controlled porosity polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling10.1016/S0928-4931(03)00052-3 ↗
20. Investigation of the mechanical properties and porosity relationships in fused deposition modelling-fabricated porous structures10.1108/13552540610652447 ↗
21. Development of a combined analytical and experimental approach for the determination of the cohesive strength between material extrusion layers using the true area of contact
22. Improving the filament weld-strength of fused filament fabrication products through improved interdiffusion
23. Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments10.1108/13552540810862028 ↗
24. Influence of inter-layer cooling time on the quasi-static properties of ABS components produced via fused deposition modelling10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.313 ↗
25. Modeling of bond formation between polymer filaments in the fused deposition modeling process10.1016/S1526-6125(04)70071-7 ↗
26. Modification of Frenkel’s model for sintering10.1002/aic.690431213 ↗
27. Numerical investigation of the influence of process conditions on the temperature variation in fused deposition modeling10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.040 ↗
28. An adaptable FEA simulation of material extrusion additive manufacturing heat transfer in 3D
29. Estimation of filament temperature and adhesion development in fused deposition techniques10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.02.026 ↗
30. A numerical study of the effect of viscoelastic stresses in fused filament fabrication10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.031 ↗
31. Nano-CT characterization of structural voids and air bubbles in fused deposition modeling for additive manufacturing
32. Influence of printing conditions on structure in FDM prototypes
33. Thermography based in-process monitoring of Fused Filament Fabrication of polymeric parts10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.123 ↗
34. Thermal conditions affecting heat transfer in FDM/FFE: a contribution towards the numerical modelling of the process10.1080/17452759.2014.984042 ↗
35. Viscous flow of crystalline bodies under the action of surface tension
36. Toward improvement of the properties of parts manufactured by FFF (fused filament fabrication) through understanding the influence of temperature and rheological behaviour on the coalescence phenomenon10.1063/1.5008034 ↗
37. Surface tension prediction for pure fluids10.1002/aic.690420523 ↗
38. Neural network modeling for prediction of weld bead geometry in laser microwelding10.1155/2013/415837 ↗
39. Eberly · 2010
40. “matterhackers.” [Online]. Available: https://www.matterhackers.com/.
41. Study of the thermal properties of filaments for 3D printing10.1063/1.4955258 ↗
42. Goel · 2006
43. A literature review of poly(lactic acid)10.1023/A:1020200822435 ↗
44. Poly (Lactic Acid)-Based Nanobiocomposites with Modulated Degradation Rates10.3390/ma11101943 ↗
45. Thermal expansion coefficient determination of polylactic acid using digital image correlation10.1051/e3sconf/20183201007 ↗
46. Heat capacity of poly (lactic acid)10.1016/j.jct.2004.05.003 ↗
47. Thermal conductivity testing apparatus for 3D printed materials10.1115/HT2017-4856 ↗
48. Poly‐Lactic Acid: production, applications, nanocomposites, and release studies10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00126.x ↗
49. Influence of parameters controlling the extrusion step in fused filament fabrication (FFF) process applied to polymers using numerical simulation10.1063/1.5034995 ↗
50. Correlations between influencing parameters and quality properties of components produced by fused deposition modeling10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.048 ↗