journal article·2017-04-13

3D printing of porous alginate/gelatin hydrogel scaffolds and their mechanical property characterization

Fu You, Xia Wu, Xiongbiao Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

Hydrogel scaffolds with well-defined internal structure and interconnected porosity are important for tissue engineering. A three-dimensional bioplotting technique supplemented with thermal/submerged ionic crosslinking process was used to fabricate hydrogel scaffolds. Six scaffold geometries were fabricated and their influence on mechanical performance was investigated. The 0/90–0.8 group with the lowest porosity showed the highest Young’s modulus while the Shift group showed the lowest Young’s modulus. Same trend has also been observed for the dynamic modulus of each group. Results demonstrated that the mechanical performance of hydrogel scaffolds can be tuned by changing the internal structure parameters including strands orientation and spacing between strands.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support of China National Research Scholarship Council (CSC) and the Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation (SHRF).

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.044 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20080210610.1002/adma.200802106 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.04510.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.045 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.12.00110.1016/j.tibtech.2003.12.001 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat142110.1038/nmat1421 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050 ↗
8. 10.1002/1439-2054(20001001)282:1<17::AID-MAME17>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/1439-2054(20001001)282:1<17::AID-MAME17>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
9. 10.1039/c3ra23341c10.1039/c3ra23341c ↗
10. 10.1039/c3sm27560d10.1039/c3sm27560d ↗
11. 10.1039/c3tb20552e10.1039/c3tb20552e ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.02310.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.023 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.07810.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.07.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2013.07.008 ↗
15. 10.1080/09205063.2015.101638310.1080/09205063.2015.1016383 ↗
16. 10.1021/bm301135210.1021/bm3011352 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.00910.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.00310.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003 ↗
19. 10.2106/00004623-197961050-0001610.2106/00004623-197961050-00016 ↗
20. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.019810.1089/ten.tea.2009.0198 ↗
21. 10.1039/c3tb21509a10.1039/c3tb21509a ↗
22. 10.1371/journal.pone.010825210.1371/journal.pone.0108252 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00337-810.1016/S0378-5173(98)00337-8 ↗
24. 10.1039/C5RA04308E10.1039/C5RA04308E ↗
25. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b0019910.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00199 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.joca.2003.08.00510.1016/j.joca.2003.08.005 ↗