Effect of Aging on the Mechanical Properties of UV Curable Optical Fiber Coatings
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A dual-layer urethane acrylate UV-cured coating is widely used to protect optical fibers because of its well-balanced mechanical properties, weathering resistance and rapid curing. The long-term mechanical behavior of fiber coatings is important for the reliability of optical fibers. Long-term exposure of UV-cured polyether urethane acrylate films was carried out in dry air and in water at elevated temperatures. Tensile testing was performed to reveal changes in mechanical properties and dynamic mechanical analysis to determine both the glass transition temperature and the crosslink density. The equilibrium swelling allowed assessment of the crosslink density. Tensile testing and strip force measurements were performed on virgin and aged optical fibers. Initially the fracture strengths of the secondary coatings increased under all aging conditions indicating post-curing reactions and the possible loss of uncrosslinked species. Aging under wet conditions led at a later stage to hydrolytic degradation of the network and to a decrease in the fracture stress. The equilibrium swelling and equilibrium modulus measurements showed good correlation with the changes in strength. The primary coatings showed a decrease in mechanical strength after only 2–4 weeks under all conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
a Department of Polymer Technology , Royal Institute of Technology , S-100 44 , Stockholm , Sweden
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Blyler L. L. · Chemtech. · 1987 · 17 · 680
2. Yuce , H. H. and Hasse , A. D. 37th Intern. Wire Cable Symp Proc. pp.732
3. Yuce , H. H. Plitz , I. M. Frantz , R. A. and Andrejco , M. 39th Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.715
4. 10.1002/pen.76034050610.1002/pen.760340506 ↗
5. 10.1002/pen.76029170410.1002/pen.760291704 ↗
6. Frantz , R. A. Plitz , I. M. Yuce , H. H. and Gebizlioglu , O. S. 41st Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.279
7. Komiya , Z. Takasugi , Y. Ukachi , T. and Paternack , G. 42nd Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.531
8. Takase , H. Hashiguchi , Y. Takasugi , Y. Saito , N. and Ukachi , T. 43rd Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.72
9. Högström , P.A. Karlsson , S. and Gedde , U. W. 45th Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.464
10. 10.1002/pen.76029170710.1002/pen.760291707 ↗
11. Szum , D. S. Chawla , C. P. Bishop , T. E. Murray , K. P. and Zimmerman , J. M. 39th Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.703
12. Hsiao , J. M. Wang , S. L. Chen , K. Y. Chang , T. C. Fann , D. M. and Lin , Y. C. 41st Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.435
13. Murata , A. Oohashi , K. and Araki , S. 45th Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.322
14. 10.1002/app.1983.07028081010.1002/app.1983.070280810 ↗
15. Szum , D. M. 43rd Int. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.59
16. Gedde U. W. · 1995
17. Yuce , H. H. 41st Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.605
18. Griffioen , W. 41st Intern. Wire Cable Symp. Proc. pp.622