journal article·2021-05-25

Nanohydroxyapatite/graphene oxide nanocomposites modified with synthetic polymers: promising materials for bone tissue engineering applications

Felora Heshmatpour, Saeedeh Haghbin

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, nano hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide (nHA/GO) composites were successfully modified by polyethyleneglycol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and chitosan. In vitro cell viability was studied using the MTT assay and ALP activity of the MG-63 osteoblastic cell line. Biocompatibility results revealed that nHA/GO composites modified with synthetic polymers showed enhanced cell viability in comparison to the control and composites with natural polymers. It was found that the viability, cell growth and proliferation of the MG-63 cells improved after 14 days of incubation. The nHA/GO composites modified by synthetic polymers exhibited efficient bioactivity, which was comparable with the conventional composites made from natural polymers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Chemistry, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.16210.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.162 ↗
2. 10.1002/app.4675610.1002/app.46756 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.24810.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.248 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.02610.1016/j.msec.2018.04.026 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.017 ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.b.3395010.1002/jbm.b.33950 ↗
7. 10.1080/00914037.2018.146613810.1080/00914037.2018.1466138 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.10000510.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100005 ↗
9. 10.1088/1758-5090/aaf44a10.1088/1758-5090/aaf44a ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.044 ↗
11. 10.1371/journal.pone.010406110.1371/journal.pone.0104061 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.07810.1016/j.msec.2019.03.078 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0472310.1021/acsnano.9b04723 ↗
14. 10.3390/ijms2012293810.3390/ijms20122938 ↗
15. 10.1080/09205063.2019.162059210.1080/09205063.2019.1620592 ↗
16. 10.1080/00914037.2016.115779310.1080/00914037.2016.1157793 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.01710.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.017 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.21010.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.210 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.07810.1016/j.msec.2015.05.078 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.01610.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.016 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msec.2010.03.01110.1016/j.msec.2010.03.011 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.16210.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.162 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.09.02710.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.09.027 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.04010.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.040 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.08.02010.1016/j.carbon.2014.08.020 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.12310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.123 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10973-018-7498-y10.1007/s10973-018-7498-y ↗
28. 10.3109/21691401.2015.103699810.3109/21691401.2015.1036998 ↗