Model of Underground Ant Nest Structure Using Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper focuses on the structural characteristics of ant nests, which are complex structures. Natural underground ant nests generally have good air circulation, pressure resistance, waterproof properties, thermal insulation and a favorable temperature and relative humidity. Additionally, ant nests are often surrounded by trees and other natural barriers. In this study, the natural underground ant nests of Iridomyrmex anceps were gathered from different collection sites. Manual cutting and frozen computer numerical control milling were performed on the ant nests in a laboratory. The internal structure of each nest was measured and recorded, and then, the 2D and 3D numerical structure models of the Iridomyrmex anceps nest were created. The static and dynamic simulation analysis of an underground ant nest structure was performed by using finite element analysis software (ABAQUS), and the mechanical properties of the ant nest were discussed. The underground ant nest structure effectively resisted the additional stress due to external static and live loads, and the ant nest was not completely destroyed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics · Tree Root and Stability Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhigao Z, Dazhi Z, Yuying A, et al. China ant resource research progress. J Agric Sci. 2007;03:63–7.
2. Tschinkel WR. Subterranean ant nests: trace fossils past and future? Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2003;192(1–4):321–33.10.1016/S0031-0182(02)00690-9 ↗
3. Wei Z, Wenjun Q, Zhi Z. The preliminary exploration of underground ant nests materials and structure. In: Canadian society for civil engineering annual conference 2015: building on our growth opportunities, May 27–30, 2015:947–954
4. Zhuang Z, You X, et al. Based on Abaqus’s finite element analysis and application. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press; 2009.
5. Shi Y, Zhou Y, et al. Based on Abaqus’s finite element analysis example explanation. Beijing: China Machine Press; 2012.
6. Li Y, Zhang J. Research on T-Splines modeling method taking NURBS as input surface. J Mach Des. 2014;31(1):105–8.
7. Peng P, Han J. The characteristics and design applications of NURBS curve knots in Rhino. J Mach Des. 2016;33(10):125–8.
8. Lai Y, Zhang YJ, Liu L, et al. Integrating CAD with Abaqus: a practical isogeometric analysis software platform for industrial applications. Comput Math Appl. 2017;74(7):1648–60.10.1016/j.camwa.2017.03.032 ↗
9. Tiwari R, Chakraborty T, Matsagar V. Dynamic analysis of a twin tunnel in soil subjected to internal blast loading. Indian Geotech J. 2016;46(4):369–80.10.1007/s40098-016-0179-5 ↗
10. Zhang ZX, Liu C, Huang X, et al. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis on ground responses during twin-tunnel construction using the URUP method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. 2016;58:133–46.10.1016/j.tust.2016.05.001 ↗
11. Abbo AJ, Sloan SW. A smooth hyperbolic approximation to the Mohr–Coulomb yield criterion. Comput Struct. 1995;54(3):427–41.10.1016/0045-7949(94)00339-5 ↗
12. Jia SP, Chen WZ, Yang JP, et al. An elastoplastic constitutive model based on modified Mohr–Coulomb criterion and its numerical implementation. Rock Soil Mech. 2010;07:2051–8.
13. Yu B. Structural vertical vibration analysis and control under walking load effect. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology; 2014.
14. Allen DE, Murray TM. Design criterion for vibrations due to walking. Eng J. 1993;30(4):117–29.10.62913/engj.v30i4.1281 ↗
15. Willford MR, Young P. Improved methodologies for the prediction of footfall-induced vibration. Buildings Nanoscale Res Beyond. 2005;5933:206–17.
16. Alves NKC, Roitman N, Magluta C. Dynamic response under human movements. Mater Struct. 1999;32(215):31–7.10.1007/BF02480409 ↗
17. Shi DY, Zhuang Z, Gao S, et al. Comparison and validation of modal analysis method based on Abaqus. Comput Aided Eng. 2013;S2:432–5.
18. Ma BJ, Feng HH, Liao RD, et al. Modal analysis of engine structure based on the modal correlation and model modification. Veh Power Technol. 2006;02. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-BGTK200602010.htm .
19. Du L. Vibration comfort study on some super highrise steel-concrete composite floor. Beijing: Tsinghua University; 2015.
20. Fu ZF, Hua HX. Modal analysis theory and application. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press; 2000.
21. Ni ZH. Vibration mechanics. Xian: Xian Jiaotong University Press; 2009.