The Compressive and Shear Characteristics of Miura-ori Forms as Core Materials of Sandwich Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The mechanical properties of Miura-ori foldcore metamaterials were studied using finite element simulations. The responses of foldcores with various topological parameters to quasi-static out-of-plane compression and shear loading were analyzed using the relative density as a governing parameter. The non-unique relationships between the core density and the materials’ strength in the examined loading directions were revealed, pointing out the strong influence of the Miura-ori topology. Linear relationships were established between the elastic moduli and relative densities of the Miura-ori metamaterials while power-law functions of the relative density with different exponent constants were established for the strength in different loading directions. It was shown that the Miura-ori materials possess the highest strength under shear in the $${X}1-{X}3$$ plane and it increases with the increase in the relative density. However, this characteristic is strongly influenced by the sector angle $$\alpha $$. In general, the difference between the two shear strengths increases when increasing the relative density by using thicker cell walls. It is noted that the strength of the Miura-ori materials as a function of the relative density is nearly constant with respect to the cell dimensions if the values of folding angle $${\gamma }0$$ and sector angle $$\alpha $$ are given. The mechanical characteristics of the Miura-ori material with equal relative density, which exhibits the highest strength among the analyzed origami models, are compared with the out-of-plane compression and shear responses of prismatic hexagonal honeycomb. It is observed that compression and shear responses of the honeycomb outperform the Miura-ori foldcore in all loading directions when considering large deformations.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhu F, Lu G, Ruan D, Wang Z. Plastic deformation, failure and energy absorption of sandwich structures with metallic cellular cores. Int J Prot Struct. 2010;1(4):507–41. https://doi.org/10.1260/2041-4196.1.4.507.10.1260/2041-4196.1.4.507 ↗
2. Ha NS, Lu G. Thin-walled corrugated structures: a review of crashworthiness designs and energy absorption characteristics. Thin-Walled Struc. 2020;157:106995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106995.10.1016/j.tws.2020.106995 ↗
3. Schenk M, Guest SD. Geometry of Miura-folded metamaterials. PNAS. 2013;110(9):3276–81. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217998110.10.1073/pnas.1217998110 ↗
4. Miura K. Zeta-core Sandwich - its concept and realization. Institute of Space and Aeronautical Science, University of Tokyo; 1972. https://repository.exst.jaxa.jp/dspace/handle/a-is/3351.
5. Miura K. New structural form of sandwich core. J Aircraft. 1975;12(5):437–41. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44468.10.2514/3.44468 ↗
6. Gattas JM, Wu W, You Z. Miura-base rigid origami: parameterizations of first-level derivative and piecewise geometries. ASME J Mech Des. 2013; 135(11): 111011-111011-11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025380.10.1115/1.4025380 ↗
7. Filipov ET, Tachi T, Paulino GH. Origami tubes assembled into stiff, yet reconfigurable structures and metamaterials. PNAS. 2015;112(40):12321–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509465112.10.1073/pnas.1509465112 ↗
8. Wei ZY, Guo ZV, Dudte L, Liang HY, Mahadevan L. Geometric mechanics of periodic pleated origami. Phys Rev Lett 2013; 110(21): 215501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.215501.10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.215501 ↗
9. Silverberg JL, Evans AA, McLeod L, Hayward RC, Hull T, Santangelo CD, Cohen I. Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials. Science. 2014;345(6197):647–50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252876.10.1126/science.1252876 ↗
10. Fischer S, Drechsler K, Kilchert S, Johnson A. Mechanical tests for foldcore base material properties. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2009;40:1941–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.005.10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.005 ↗
11. Gattas JM, You Z. Quasi-static impact response of alternative origami-core sandwich panels. ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference; 2013. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.10.1115/DETC2013-12681 ↗
12. Gattas JM, You Z. Quasi-static impact of indented foldcores. Int J Impact Eng. 2014;73:15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.06.001.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.06.001 ↗
13. Lv Y, Zhang Y, Gong N, Li ZX, Lu G, Xiang X. On the out-of-plane compression of a Miura-ori patterned sheet. Int J Mech Sci. 2019; 161-162, 105022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105022.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105022 ↗
14. Xiang X, Qiang W, Hou B, Tran P, Lu G. Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical properties of Miura-ori metamaterials. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020; 157: 106993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106993.10.1016/j.tws.2020.106993 ↗
15. Ma J, Song J, Chen Y. An origami-inspired structure with graded stiffness. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;136:134–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.026.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.026 ↗
16. Xiang X, You Z, Lu L. Rectangular sandwich plates with Miura-ori folded core under quasi-static loadings. Compos Struct. 2018;195:359–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.084.10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.084 ↗
17. Qiang W, Zhang J, Karagiozova D, Tran P, Lu G. Quasi-static energy absorption of Miura-Ori metamaterials. JOM. 2021;73:4177–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-04939-w.10.1007/s11837-021-04939-w ↗
18. Heimbs S, Middendorf P, Kilchert S, Johnson AF, Maier M. Experimental and numerical analysis of composite folded sandwich core structures under compression. Appl Compos Mater. 2007;14:363–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-008-9051-9.10.1007/s10443-008-9051-9 ↗
19. Heimbs S, Cichosz J, Klaus M, Kilchert S, Johnson AF. Sandwich structures with textile-reinforced composite foldcores under impact loads. Compos Struct. 2010;92:1485–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.001.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.001 ↗
20. Côte F, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA, Evans AG. The compressive and shear responses of corrugated and diamond lattice materials. Int J Solids Struct. 2006;43:6220–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.07.045.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.07.045 ↗
21. Zhou X, Wang H, You Z. Mechanical properties of Miura-based folded cores under quasi-static loads. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014;82:296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.05.001.10.1016/j.tws.2014.05.001 ↗
22. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids: structure and properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
23. Zhang J, Karagiozova D, You Z, Chen Y, Lu L. Quasi-static large deformation compressive behaviour of origami-based metamaterials. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;153:194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.044.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.044 ↗
24. Gheitasi A, Alinia MM. Slenderness classification of unstiffened metal plates under shear loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2010;48:508–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2010.02.004.10.1016/j.tws.2010.02.004 ↗