journal article·2026-07-13Open access

Predicting 28-Day Cement Compressive Strength for Delayed Quality Control Using Early-Age Strength and a Weighted CatBoost–XGBoost Ensemble

Mustafa Taha Topaloğlu, Cevher Kürşat Macit, Burak Tanyeri, Ukbe Usame Uçar

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 14

Abstract

A data-driven and industrially applicable framework was developed to predict the 28-day compressive strength of cement using routine quality control data from the SEZA Cement Plant. Since 28-day strength is obtained only after a substantial delay, the proposed framework was designed to support earlier decision-making during production. To improve predictive capability, 7-day compressive strength was incorporated as an explanatory variable together with plant quality control parameters, thereby linking early-age mechanical response to later-age performance. Before modeling, the dataset was systematically preprocessed through column standardization, numeric type conversion, removal of incomplete observations, and elimination of age-related strength variables other than the target to avoid information leakage. For comparative evaluation, CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, and Extra Trees were implemented. In addition, a hybrid model, termed the ‘Early-Age-Strength-Supported Weighted Dual-Boosting Ensemble’ (EYD-AIBE), was proposed by combining the optimized predictions of CatBoost and XGBoost using fixed weights. Model performance was assessed under both random split and time split schemes in order to evaluate not only overall pattern-learning capacity but also temporal generalizability. Hyperparameter optimization was performed for CatBoost and XGBoost using Optuna. The results showed that EYD-AIBE achieved the best performance in both evaluation settings. Under random split, it yielded R2 = 0.535, RMSE = 0.988 MPa, and MAE = 0.785 MPa, whereas under time split, the model achieved R2 = 0.405, RMSE = 1.148 MPa, and MAE = 0.900 MPa. These findings indicate that the proposed hybrid framework provides a feasible, reliable, and methodologically robust tool for cement quality control, production monitoring, process optimization, and early decision support.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

SYCS Construction Cement Industry and Trade Incorporated Company, 06000 Ankara, Turkey

School of Aviation, Aircraft Airframe-Engine Maintenance, Fırat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey

Funding

SYCS Construction Cement Industry · Trade Incorporated Company

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Machine learning in concrete science: Applications, challenges, and best practices10.1038/s41524-022-00810-x ↗
2. Gamil, Y. (2023). Machine learning in concrete technology: A review of current researches, trends, and applications. Front. Built Environ., 9.10.3389/fbuil.2023.1145591 ↗
3. Comparative analysis of gradient-boosting ensembles for estimation of compressive strength of quaternary blend concrete10.1186/s40069-023-00653-w ↗
4. Fu, H., Zhou, X., Xu, P., and Sun, D. (2025). Prediction of Compressive Strength of Concrete Using Explainable Machine Learning Models. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18215009 ↗
5. Predicting the compressive strength of high-performance concrete using an interpretable machine learning model10.1038/s41598-024-79502-z ↗
6. Investigating the effectiveness of hybrid gradient boosting models and optimization algorithms for concrete strength prediction10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110568 ↗
7. Bayesian optimization of stacking ensemble learning model for HPC compressive strength prediction10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128281 ↗
8. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
9. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree
10. CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features
11. Industrial-scale prediction of cement clinker phases using machine learning10.1038/s44172-025-00432-3 ↗
12. Prediction of f-CaO content in cement clinker: A novel prediction method based on LightGBM and Bayesian optimization10.1016/j.chemolab.2021.104461 ↗
13. Hybrid model of a cement rotary kiln using an improved attention-based recurrent neural network10.1016/j.isatra.2022.02.018 ↗
14. Modeling of energy consumption factors for an industrial cement vertical roller mill by SHAP-XGBoost: A “conscious lab” approach10.1038/s41598-022-11429-9 ↗
15. Methodological development for the optimisation of electricity cost in cement factories: The use of artificial intelligence in process variables10.1007/s00202-021-01409-z ↗
16. SA-LSTMs: A new advance prediction method of energy consumption in cement raw materials grinding system10.1016/j.energy.2021.122768 ↗
17. A survey on concept drift adaptation10.1145/2523813 ↗
18. Hinder, F., Vaquet, V., and Hammer, B. (2024). One or two things we know about concept drift—A survey on monitoring in evolving environments. Part A: Detecting concept drift. Front. Artif. Intell., 7.10.3389/frai.2024.1330257 ↗
19. Optimizing LightGBM and XGBoost algorithms for estimating compressive strength in High-Performance concrete
20. Machine learning and interactive GUI for concrete compressive strength prediction10.1038/s41598-024-66957-3 ↗
21. Mechanisms of cement hydration10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.011 ↗
22. Cement hydration mechanisms through time—A review10.1007/s10853-023-08651-9 ↗
23. Small data machine learning in materials science10.1038/s41524-023-01000-z ↗
24. Ensemble learning: A survey10.1002/widm.1249 ↗
25. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
26. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
27. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
28. TPE-xgboost for explainable predictions of concrete compressive strength considering compositions, and mechanical and microstructure properties of testing samples10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139398 ↗
29. Predicting the compressive strength of high-performance concrete via the DR-CatBoost model
30. Optimized hybrid XGBoost-CatBoost model for enhanced prediction of concrete strength and reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulations10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112490 ↗
31. Taking the human out of the loop: A review of Bayesian optimization10.1109/JPROC.2015.2494218 ↗
32. A survey on multi-objective hyperparameter optimization algorithms for machine learning10.1007/s10462-022-10359-2 ↗
33. On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028 ↗
34. A survey on concept drift in process mining10.1145/3472752 ↗
35. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
36. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 ↗
37. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., and Koyama, M. (2019, January 4–8). Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
38. Machine learning for predicting compressive strength of sustainable cement paste incorporating copper mine tailings as supplementary cementitious materials
39. Comparative analysis of cement grade and cement strength as input features for machine learning-based concrete strength prediction
40. Hybrid data-driven approaches to predicting the compressive strength of ultra-high-performance concrete using SHAP and PDP analyses
41. Efficient machine learning models for estimation of compressive strengths of zeolite and diatomite substituting concrete in sodium chloride solution10.1007/s13369-024-09042-1 ↗
42. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
43. An enhanced weighted ensemble approach for predicting concrete compressive strength10.1007/s41939-025-00920-1 ↗
44. Prediction and deployment of compressive strength of high-performance concrete using ensemble learning techniques10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138808 ↗
45. Predicting concrete compressive strength using hybrid ensembling of surrogate machine learning models10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106449 ↗
46. High-performance concrete strength prediction based on ensemble learning10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126694 ↗
47. Ensemble XGBoost schemes for improved compressive strength prediction of UHPC10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105062 ↗
48. Eid, M.M., Alhussan, A.A., Mattar, E.A., Khodadadi, N., and El-Kenawy, E.S.M. (2026). Concrete Strength Prediction Using Machine Learning and Somersaulting Spider Optimizer. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 146.10.32604/cmes.2025.073555 ↗
49. A novel approach to explain the black-box nature of machine learning in compressive strength predictions of concrete using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)
50. An improved prediction of high-performance concrete compressive strength using ensemble models and neural networks10.1007/s43503-024-00040-8 ↗
51. Online cement clinker quality monitoring: A soft sensor model based on multivariate time series analysis and CNN10.1016/j.isatra.2021.01.058 ↗
52. Soft sensor for real-time cement fineness estimation10.1016/j.isatra.2014.09.019 ↗
53. From concept drift to model degradation: An overview on performance-aware drift detectors10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108632 ↗
54. A note on the validity of cross-validation for evaluating autoregressive time series prediction10.1016/j.csda.2017.11.003 ↗