journal article·2026-07-10Open access

Prediction and Generalization Capability of Machine Learning Models for Shield TBM-Induced Settlement

Ji-Seok Yun, Wan-Kyu Yoo, Gi-Jun Lee, Je-Kyum Lee, Young-Suk Song, Chang-Yong Kim, Han-Eol Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 14

Abstract

Ground settlement induced by shield tunnel boring machine (TBM) excavation is a major geotechnical concern in urban tunneling because it may affect the safety of adjacent structures and underground infrastructure. In this study, machine learning models were developed to predict the maximum settlement induced by shield TBM excavation using a three-dimensional numerical analysis database comprising 320 simulation cases generated from combinations of tunnel diameter (D), ground elastic modulus (E), face pressure (FP), and backfill pressure (BP). Random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were developed and compared with an existing regression-based settlement prediction equation. Predictive performance and generalization capability were evaluated using random split and GroupKFold validation techniques. Under random split validation, RF achieved the highest predictive performance, with a coefficient of determination of 0.997 and a root mean square error of 0.438 mm, followed by XGBoost. Both machine learning models outperformed the existing settlement prediction equation. However, model performance decreased substantially under GroupKFold validation, indicating limited generalization capability under unseen D–E grouped conditions. The results demonstrate that the developed machine learning models provide accurate predictions within the range of tunnel–ground conditions represented by the adopted numerical analysis database. The findings highlight the importance of evaluating both predictive performance and generalization capability, particularly when machine learning models developed from numerical analysis databases are applied beyond the conditions represented in the training database.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geotechnical Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea

Geological Safety Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon 34132, Republic of Korea

Underground Safety Assessment Center, Korea Expressway Corporation Research Institute, Hwaseong-si 18489, Republic of Korea

Funding

KICT Strategic Research Progra · Ministry of Science and ICT

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Environmental effects of tunnel excavation in soft and shallow ground with EPBM: The case of Istanbul10.1007/s12665-009-0032-6 ↗
2. Shield-driven induced ground surface and Ming Dynasty City Wall settlement of Xi’an Metro10.1016/j.tust.2019.103220 ↗
3. Analysis of face stability at the launch stage of shield or TBM tunnelling using a concrete box in complex urban environments10.1016/j.tust.2023.105067 ↗
4. Centrifuge testing and numerical modeling of tunnel face stability considering longitudinal slope angle and steady-state seepage in soft clay10.1016/j.tust.2020.103406 ↗
5. Shield tunneling and environment protection in Shanghai soft ground10.1016/j.tust.2008.12.005 ↗
6. Analysis and design of partial ground improvement in deep excavations10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.09.005 ↗
7. Yun, J.S., Kim, H.E., and Yoo, H.K. (2024). Three-dimensional modeling and analysis of ground settlement due to twin tunneling using GIS. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16145891 ↗
8. Peck, R.B. (1969, January 25–29). Deep Excavations and Tunnelling in Soft Ground. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (ICSMFE), Mexico City, Mexico.
9. Predicting the dynamics of ground settlement and its derivitives caused by tunnelling in soil
10. O’Reilly, M.P., and New, B.M. (1982). Settlements Above Tunnels in the United Kingdom—Their Magnitude and Prediction. Proceedings of Tunnelling ’82 Symposium, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy.
11. Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays10.1680/geot.1993.43.2.315 ↗
12. An estimation of subsurface settlement due to shield tunneling10.1016/j.tust.2014.07.015 ↗
13. Analysis of undrained soil deformation due to ground loss10.1680/geot.1987.37.3.301 ↗
14. Surface settlements due to deformation of a tunnel in an elastic half plane10.1680/geot.1996.46.4.753 ↗
15. Analytical prediction for tunneling-induced ground movements in clays10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:9(846) ↗
16. Three-dimensional centrifuge and numerical modeling of the interaction between perpendicularly crossing tunnels10.1139/cgj-2012-0445 ↗
17. Centrifuge investigation into the effect of new shield tunnelling on an existing underlying large-diameter tunnel10.1016/j.tust.2014.02.004 ↗
18. Three-dimensional centrifuge modeling of ground and pipeline response to tunnel excavation10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001529 ↗
19. A new method based on centrifuge model test for evaluating ground settlement induced by tunneling10.1007/s12205-019-0780-0 ↗
20. Numerical assessment of subsidence and adjacent building movements induced by TBM-EPB tunneling10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001166 ↗
21. Investigation of sloped surface subsidence during inclined seam extraction in a jointed rock mass using discontinuous deformation analysis10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000894 ↗
22. Three-dimensional numerical investigation of ground settlement caused by side-by-side twin tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2025.106509 ↗
23. Numerical analysis of underground displacements stirred by compaction grouting during tunnel construction10.1016/j.tust.2024.105931 ↗
24. Yun, J.S., Yoo, H.K., Hwang, S.P., Kim, W.S., and Kim, H.E. (2025). Prediction of settlement due to shield TBM tunneling based on three-dimensional numerical analysis. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15132235 ↗
25. Application of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103991 ↗
26. Effectiveness of predicting tunneling-induced ground settlements using machine learning methods with small datasets10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.08.018 ↗
27. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
28. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
29. Comprehensive review of machine learning in geotechnical reliability analysis: Algorithms, applications and further challenges10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110066 ↗
30. Machine learning-based prediction model for disc cutter life in TBM excavation through hard rock formations10.1016/j.tust.2024.105826 ↗
31. Effects of important factors on surface settlement prediction for metro tunnel excavated by EPB10.1016/j.tust.2013.02.002 ↗
32. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
33. Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure10.1111/ecog.02881 ↗
34. Assessing transferability of ecological models: An underappreciated aspect of statistical validation10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00170.x ↗
35. Numerical evaluation of surface settlement induced by ground loss from the face and annular gap of EPB shield tunneling
36. Critical face pressure and backfill pressure in shield TBM tunneling on soft ground