journal article·2026-07-09Open access

Analysis and Design of a Mechanical Cam-Screw Press with an Optimized Lower-Drive Configuration for the Production of High-Quality Steel Products

Tanat Sharatbekov, Bakhyt Absadykov, Erlan Askarov, Assylbek Kassenov, Anna Kawalek, Yadgor Ruzmetov, Oleg Ablyalimov

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 14

Abstract

This study presents the design and numerical evaluation of a mechanical cam-screw press with an optimized lower-drive configuration for high-quality steel product manufacturing. The proposed design relocates the drive mechanism from the upper part to the lower part of the press frame in order to reduce the structural height, lower the center of gravity, improve load transfer, and reduce deformation of the working zone. Analytical calculations were performed for a nominal pressing force of 630 kN, corresponding approximately to a 63 ton-force mechanical press. The static torque transmitted to the main shaft was 283.5 kNm, while the dynamic torque, calculated using a dynamic coefficient of 1.10, reached 311.85 kNm. Three-dimensional upper- and lower-drive configurations were developed in SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2024 (Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corp., Waltham, MA, USA), and finite element analysis was used to evaluate von Mises stress, total displacement, safety factor, and modal behavior. No-penetration contact was applied in the cam-screw and shaft-support regions, with a friction coefficient of 0.15 for lubricated steel-to-steel contact. The lower-drive configuration reduced the maximum static von Mises stress from 688.4 MPa to 642.7 MPa and the dynamic stress from 748.6 MPa to 701.5 MPa. The maximum static and dynamic displacements were reduced by 12.50% and 10.29%, respectively. Modal analysis showed that relocating the drive changes the dynamic characteristics of the structure; therefore, operating frequencies must be selected with sufficient separation from the natural frequencies. The results confirm that the optimized lower-drive configuration improves stiffness, reduces stress concentration, and provides a promising basis for compact and stable medium-capacity forming equipment. The limitations related to simplified contact modeling, belt-drive representation, thermo-mechanical effects, lubrication, and prototype validation are also discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan

Department of Transport Engineering and Technologies, International Transport and Humanitarian University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan

Department of Transport and Mechanical Engineering, Kazakh National University of Water Management and Irrigation, Taraz 080000, Kazakhstan

Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland

Department of Wagons and Wagon Engineering, Tashkent State Transport University, Tashkent 010000, Uzbekistan

Department of Locomotives and Locomotive Engineering, Tashkent State Transport University, Tashkent 010000, Uzbekistan

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Budynas, R.G., and Nisbett, J.K. (2020). Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill Education. [11th ed.].
2. Norton, R.L. (2020). Machine Design: An Integrated Approach, Pearson. [6th ed.].
3. Kalpakjian, S., and Schmid, S.R. (2020). Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, Pearson. [8th ed.].
4. Mechanical press based on a cam mechanism with an enlarged contact spot
5. Design features of a cam-screw press with a large effort
6. Behera, R., Chan, T.-C., and Yang, J.-S. (2024). Innovative structural optimization and dynamic performance enhancement of high-precision five-axis machine tools. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 8.10.3390/jmmp8040181 ↗
7. Finite element analysis and structure optimization of a gantry-type high-precision machine tool10.1038/s41598-023-40214-5 ↗
8. Childs, P.R.N. (2019). Mechanical Design Engineering Handbook, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-08-102367-9.00001-9 ↗
9. Dassault Systèmes (2026, June 12). SOLIDWORKS Simulation Documentation. Available online: https://help.solidworks.com/.
10. Zienkiewicz, O.C., Taylor, R.L., and Zhu, J.Z. (2013). The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, Elsevier. [7th ed.].
11. Bathe, K.J. (1996). Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall.
12. Reddy, J.N. (2019). An Introduction to the Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill Education. [4th ed.].
13. Logan, D.L. (2017). A First Course in the Finite Element Method, Cengage Learning. [6th ed.].
14. Timoshenko, S.P., and Goodier, J.N. (1970). Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill. [3rd ed.].10.1115/1.3408648 ↗
15. Harris, T.A., and Kotzalas, M.N. (2006). Rolling Bearing Analysis, CRC Press. [5th ed.].10.1201/9781482275148 ↗
16. SKF Group (2023). Rolling Bearings Catalogue, SKF Group.
17. Gates Corporation (2022). V-Belt Drive Design Manual, Gates Corporation.
18. Altan, T., and Tekkaya, A.E. (2012). Sheet Metal Forming: Fundamentals, ASM International.10.31399/asm.tb.smff.9781627083164 ↗
19. Groover, M.P. (2020). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, Wiley. [7th ed.].
20. Satonkar, N., Venkatachalam, G., and Pitchumani, S.V. (2024). Finite element analysis of electromagnetic forming process and optimization of process parameters using RSM. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12111622 ↗
21. Graça, A., and Vincze, G. (2021). A short review on the finite element method for asymmetric rolling processes. Metals, 11.10.3390/met11050762 ↗
22. Formability investigation of perforated austenitic SS 304L sheets using single-point incremental forming10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.08.052 ↗
23. Deformation behavior and formability of solid solution state Al–Li alloy in electromagnetic forming10.1016/j.msea.2022.143858 ↗
24. Rao, S.S. (2018). Mechanical Vibrations, Pearson. [6th ed.].
25. Inman, D.J. (2023). Engineering Vibration, Pearson. [5th ed.].
26. Den Hartog, J.P. (1985). Mechanical Vibrations, Dover Publications.
27. Zhang, L., and Wang, Z. (2024). Application of the finite element method for analyzing the vibration characteristics of a spindle system and fault diagnosis. Symmetry, 16.10.3390/sym16111468 ↗
28. Modal analysis of CNC milling machine bed made of different alloys using finite element modeling
29. (2017). Machine Tools Safety-Presses-Part 1: General Safety Requirements (Standard No. ISO 16092-1:2017).
30. (2019). Machine Tools Safety-Presses-Part 2: Safety Requirements for Mechanical Presses (Standard No. ISO 16092-2:2019).
31. (2007). Rolling Bearings-Dynamic Load Ratings and Rating Life (Standard No. ISO 281:2007).