Design and Experimental Validation of a Passive Following System for a Mecanum-Wheel Mobile Platform Based on Gimbal Posture Perception and Orthogonal Odometry Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Indoor companion, rehabilitation, logistics, laboratory transport, and service robot scenarios require mobile platforms that can follow a human operator safely and flexibly under lighting changes, occlusion, texture-poor corridors, and dynamic pedestrian environments. Vision-, LiDAR-, and UWB-based following systems can provide high perception capability, but their deployment cost, environmental dependence, and sensing complexity remain limiting factors for low-perception-dependence applications. This paper presents a passive following system for a Mecanum-wheel mobile platform based on gimbal posture perception and orthogonal odometry fusion. A rope-tensioned two-axis gimbal is mounted above a 300 mm × 300 mm × 150 mm omnidirectional chassis, and a six-axis inertial sensor installed at the top of the gimbal detects pitch and roll changes induced by user traction. A piecewise posture-to-velocity mapping model with a dead zone, saturation, low-pass filtering, and acceleration limiting converts the user’s traction intention into planar velocity commands in the vehicle coordinate frame. To reduce pose errors caused by Mecanum-wheel slip and discontinuous roller-ground contact, two orthogonal passive odometry wheels and inertial attitude estimation are fused to provide planar position feedback for closed-loop following. A prototype was implemented using an Infineon TRAVEO CYT4BB77 controller, TI DRV8701E motor drivers, six-axis IMUs, magnetic encoders, and an embedded display interface. Experiments evaluated attitude estimation accuracy, planar localization accuracy, passive following performance, gyroscope compensation, and open-loop/closed-loop following. The compensated attitude module achieved a static yaw drift of 0.45 deg/h and a dynamic attitude RMSE below 0.56 deg. Orthogonal odometry fusion produced an average positioning error of 3.8 mm over a 3000 mm linear displacement, reducing error by approximately 84.6% compared with pure Mecanum-wheel drive odometry. In a 5000 mm forward traction task, closed-loop following reduced the average distance error from 38.6 mm to 11.5 mm compared with open-loop attitude mapping. The results indicate that the proposed gimbal-orthogonal odometry architecture provides a compact, intuitive, and environment-robust solution for passive following on omnidirectional mobile platforms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Inertial Sensor and Navigation · Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
School of Artificial Intelligence, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Wheeled Mobile Robots: State of the Art Overview and Kinematic Comparison among Three Omnidirectional Locomotion Strategies10.1007/s10846-022-01745-7 ↗
2. Burkacki, M., Lysy, I., Suchon, S., Chrzan, M., and Kowolik, R. (2025). Systematic Review of Mecanum and Omni Wheel Technologies for Motor Impairments. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15094773 ↗
3. Immediate Effect of an Over-Ground Walking Assistance Robot with Mecanum Wheels on Lower Limb Muscle Activity and Gait Ability in Stroke: A Single-Session Study10.1177/10538135251413669 ↗
4. Ferland, F., Aumont, A., Letourneau, D., and Michaud, F. (2013, January 3–6). Taking Your Robot for a Walk: Force-Guiding a Mobile Robot Using Compliant Arms. Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2013), Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/HRI.2013.6483604 ↗
5. Admittance Control for Physical Human-Robot Interaction10.1177/0278364918768950 ↗
6. Tata, D., Chamorro, W., Maldonado, D., and Pillajo, R. (2025). Extended Kalman Filter-Based 2D Pose Estimation for Omnidirectional Mecanum Robots via Sensor Fusion: A SO(2) Lie Group Formulation. Eng. Proc., 115.10.3390/engproc2025115003 ↗
7. Robust Unknown Input Estimation for a Mecanum-Wheels Omnidirectional Mobile Robot Modeled as a Convex qLPV System10.1016/j.ejcon.2026.101466 ↗
8. Li, C., and Li, Z. (2025). Dynamic Modeling and Disturbance-Observer-Enhanced Control for Mecanum-Wheeled Vehicles under Load and Noise Disturbance. Mathematics, 13.10.3390/math13050789 ↗
9. Nakagawa, Y., Igo, N., and Hoshino, K. (2025). Controlling a Mecanum-Wheeled Robot with Multiple Swivel Axes Controlled by Three Commands. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25030709 ↗
10. Real-Time Path Planning for Mecanum-Wheeled Robots with Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controller10.1177/17298806251356720 ↗
11. Lu, Z., He, G., Wang, R., Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Chen, D., and Hou, T. (2021). An Orthogonal Wheel Odometer for Positioning in a Relative Coordinate System on a Floating Ground. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311340 ↗
12. Wang, H. (2018). Design and Implementation of Planar Positioning System Based on Inertial Sensor and Orthogonal Odometer. [Master’s Thesis, Northeastern University].
13. Han, X. (2021). Design and Development of Indoor Planar Robot Positioning System. [Master’s Thesis, Northeastern University].
14. Multi-Sensor Fusion Based ADRC Control of Multiple Robots Formation
15. Lei, Y. (2016). Design of Micro Inertial Measurement System Based on STM32 and MEMS Devices. [Master’s Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology].
16. Application of the Adaptive Kalman Filter in the MEMS Gyro Signal Processing
17. Study on Calibration Method of MEMS Gyroscope Based on Total Least-Squares
18. Person-Following by Autonomous Robots: A Categorical Overview10.1177/0278364919881683 ↗
19. Kobilarov, M., Sukhatme, G., Hyams, J., and Batavia, P. (2006, January 15–19). People Tracking and Following with Mobile Robot Using an Omnidirectional Camera and a Laser. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Orlando, FL, USA.
20. Leigh, A., Pineau, J., Olmedo, N., and Zhang, H. (2015, January 26–30). Person Tracking and Following with 2D Laser Scanners. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139259 ↗
21. Algabri, R., and Choi, M.-T. (2020). Deep-Learning-Based Indoor Human Following of Mobile Robot Using Color Feature. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20092699 ↗
22. Kwon, J.-W., Lee, H., Lee, J., Lee, N.-H., Kim, J.C., Uhm, T., and Choi, Y.-H. (2024). UWB-Based Human-Following System with Obstacle and Crevasse Avoidance for Polar-Exploration Robots. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14166918 ↗
23. A Robust Tracking Algorithm for a Human-Following Mobile Robot10.1049/ipr2.12062 ↗
24. A Review on Challenges of Autonomous Mobile Robot and Sensor Fusion Methods10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975643 ↗
25. A Multiple Sensor Fusion Based Drift Compensation Algorithm for Mecanum Wheeled Mobile Robots10.3906/elk-2003-12 ↗