journal article·2026-07-06Open access

A Translational Predictive Analytics Framework for Explainable Risk Assessment: Transforming High-Dimensional Surgical Data into Clinical Decision Support Tiers (S-CRI)

Ioanna Michou, Ioannis Maroulis, Ioannis Hatzilygeroudis, Constantinos Koutsojannis

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 13

Abstract

Clinical prediction rules often suffer from a translation gap, balancing high-dimensional statistical accuracy against practical bedside interpretability. This study presents the Surgical Complication Risk Index (S-CRI), an explainable, data-decoupled risk-stratification framework designed to predict post-operative complications using multi-center electronic health registry records (N = 19,965). To ensure strict validation integrity, data partitioning (70% development, n = 13,975; 30% independent holdout testing, n = 5990) was executed before any engineering or risk-tier group isolation. A parsimonious multivariate logistic regression model was fitted within the development cohort, utilizing five predictors: length of stay (LOS) accrued up to the morning of assessment, two institutional categorical groupings, and two historical entry-diagnosis empirical risk tiers. To bridge the translational gap, all fractional regression coefficients were scaled by the baseline anchor and rounded to the nearest whole integer, yielding a simple bedside scorecard where 1 point = 1 inpatient day. On the completely blinded independent holdout cohort, the whole-integer S-CRI demonstrated robust discriminative performance with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8741 (95% CI: 0.864–0.884) and a Precision–Recall AUC of 0.5785. Setting a baseline operational threshold ≥ 0 yielded an accuracy of 88.18%, a specificity of 96.43%, and a sensitivity of 35.43%, while an optimized integer screening cutoff score of ≥−4 maximized screening capacity (sensitivity: 63.95%; specificity: 91.68%). By enforcing strict temporal landmark constraints to eliminate reverse causality and removing all out-of-sample data leakage, the S-CRI provides an objective, transparent, and interpretable clinical decision support mechanism for early inpatient risk stratification, designed as a supplementary clinical decision-support aid, rather than as a definitive diagnostic replacement for independent clinical judgment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physiotherapy Department, School of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece

Department of Surgery, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece

Computer Engineering & Informatics Department, School of Engineering, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece

Health Physics & Computational Intelligence Laboratory, Physiotherapy Department, School of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X ↗
2. World Health Organization (2026, January 25). WHO Calls for Urgent Action to Reduce Patient Harm in Healthcare. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/13-09-2019-who-calls-for-urgent-action-to-reduce-patient-harm-in-healthcare.
3. Michou, I., Maroulis, I., Chatzilygeroudis, I., and Koutsojannis, C. (2026). Machine Learning for Predicting Medical Error Risks in Greek Surgery Departments. Appl. Sci., 16.10.20944/preprints202505.1658.v2 ↗
4. Applications of artificial intelligence-based conversational agents in healthcare: A systematic umbrella review10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106204 ↗
5. Preoperative prediction of intraoperative complications in cataract surgery: A machine learning approach10.1007/s10792-025-03837-3 ↗
6. Artificial intelligence–driven patient selection for preoperative portal vein embolization for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases10.1016/j.jvir.2024.11.025 ↗
7. Patient safety at ten: Unmistakable progress, troubling gaps10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0785 ↗
8. Essential surgery: Key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60091-5 ↗
9. Medical error—The third leading cause of death in the US10.1136/bmj.i2139 ↗
10. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: Lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems10.1136/bmj.320.7237.759 ↗
11. Errors in surgery10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.04.003 ↗
12. Institute of Medicine (2000). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System, National Academies Press.
13. Flin, R., and O’Connor, P. (2017). Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].10.1201/9781315607467 ↗
14. Defining and Studying Errors in Surgical Care: A Systematic Review10.1097/SLA.0000000000005351 ↗
15. Henriksen, K., Battles, J.B., Marks, E.S., and Lewin, D.I. (2025, January 20). Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20545/.
16. Safety of inpatient care in surgical settings: Cohort study10.1136/bmj-2024-080480 ↗
17. Rates of serious surgical errors in California and plans to prevent recurrence10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7058 ↗
18. Machine Learning and Surgical Outcomes Prediction: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.045 ↗
19. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations10.1126/science.aax2342 ↗
20. Natural language processing in medicine: A review
21. Machine learning for medical error prevention in departments of surgery: A review of challenges and biases
22. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfdab3 ↗
23. Surgeon burnout and its association with patient safety outcomes
24. The surgeon as a risk factor
25. “Global trigger tool” shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190 ↗
26. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: A decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons
27. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: A systematic review10.1136/qshc.2007.023622 ↗
28. A novel interpretable machine learning system to generate clinical risk scores: An application for predicting early mortality or unplanned readmission in a retrospective cohort study