Dynamic Social Risk Assessment for Inland Waterway Lock Reservation Scheduling: A Stakeholder-Informed Dynamic Weighting and Two-Dimensional Cloud Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Inland waterway locks are critical navigation infrastructures in waterborne transport systems, and their operational reliability is closely associated with the resilience and service capacity of regional inland waterway networks. As lockage demand continues to increase, reservation scheduling has emerged as an important institutional and operational instrument for improving traffic organization, alleviating congestion, and enhancing the adaptive capacity of lock operations. However, the implementation of reservation-based rules may reshape lockage resource allocation, priority mechanisms, vessel arrival patterns, and stakeholder benefit structures, thereby generating social risks that cannot be adequately captured by conventional engineering safety assessment methods. To address this issue, this study develops a stakeholder-informed dynamic social risk assessment framework for inland waterway lock reservation scheduling. First, a hybrid scheduling mode combining priority reservation and declaration-based queuing is conceptualized, and its operational process is characterized through lockage resource allocation, vessel reservation/declaration, coordinated water-area control, anchorage and safety inspection, and sequenced vessel lockage. Second, drawing on the social amplification of risk framework, a social risk assessment indicator system is constructed from four dimensions: legality, rationality, feasibility, and controllability. Third, a Dynamic Weighting Model is introduced to adaptively update indicator weights according to changes in scheduling rules and operational states, while a Two-Dimensional Cloud Model is developed to jointly represent risk probability and risk consequence under uncertainty. The proposed approach is validated using the reservation scheduling scenario of the Three Gorges locks. The results indicate that the overall social risk is classified as level 2, corresponding to a moderately low risk level, suggesting that the reservation scheduling mode is generally compatible with lock operation and navigation management requirements. Among the four dimensions, controllability exhibits the highest relative risk, indicating that greater attention should be paid to safety management, reservation compliance, public opinion guidance, and emergency response. The proposed framework provides a systematic and visual decision-support tool for risk identification, risk grading, and scheme optimization in inland waterway lock reservation scheduling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Navigation and Safety · Risk and Safety Analysis · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
Office of Scientific Research, Zhejiang Institute of Communications, Hangzhou 311100, China
State Key Laboratory of Maritime Technology and Safety, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430062, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Zhejiang Education Department · Zhejiang Institute of Communications · Department of Transport of Yunnan Province
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. On the Applicability of Queueing Theory to Lock Capacity Analysis10.1016/0041-1647(78)90121-1 ↗
2. Orthogonal Design-Based NSGA-III for the Optimal Lockage Co-Scheduling Problem10.1109/TITS.2016.2630718 ↗
3. Control Alternatives at a Waterway Lock10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2001)127:2(89) ↗
4. Managing Ship Lock Congestion in an Inland Waterway: A Bottleneck Model with a Service Time Window10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.017 ↗
5. Li, R., Liu, Q., and Wang, L. (2024). An Index Model for the Evaluation of the Performance of Lock Navigation Scheduling Rules Considering the Perspective of Stakeholders. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16052054 ↗
6. A Framework for Combining Social Impact Assessment and Risk Assessment10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.003 ↗
7. Adapting Social Impact Assessment to Address a Project’s Human Rights Impacts and Risks10.1016/j.eiar.2017.07.001 ↗
8. The Generalized Lock Scheduling Problem: An Exact Approach10.1016/j.tre.2013.12.010 ↗
9. An Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search for Solving Generalized Lock Scheduling Problem: Comparative Study with Exact Methods10.1109/TITS.2019.2926405 ↗
10. An Exact Approach to the Generalized Serial-Lock Scheduling Problem from a Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Perspective10.1016/j.cor.2020.105164 ↗
11. Wu, Z., Ji, B., and Yu, S.S. (2024). Modeling and Solution Algorithm for Green Lock Scheduling Problem on Inland Waterways. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12081192 ↗
12. The Generalized Serial-Lock Scheduling Problem on Inland Waterway: A Novel Decomposition-Based Solution Framework and Efficient Heuristic Approach10.1016/j.tre.2022.102935 ↗
13. Co-Scheduling of Lock and Water–Land Transshipment for Ships Passing the Dam10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.019 ↗
14. Discrete Multi-Objective Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Green Co-Scheduling Problem of Ship Lift and Ship Lock10.1016/j.aei.2023.101897 ↗
15. Groundwater Environmental Effects Risk Evaluation in Mountain Tunnel Construction: A Dynamic Decision Support System Based on Fuzzy Two-Dimensional Cloud Probability Model10.1016/j.tust.2024.106276 ↗
16. A Framework for Evaluating Societal Safety Interventions10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105393 ↗
17. A Semi-Probabilistic Procedure for Developing Societal Risk Function10.1007/s11069-018-3233-z ↗
18. Coordinated Development Evaluation and Diagnosis of Regional Water Resources-Social Economy-Ecological Environment System Based on Mechanical Model and Risk Matrix10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131013 ↗
19. Evaluating the Societal Impact of Disaster-Driven Infrastructure Disruptions: A Water Analysis Perspective10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101988 ↗
20. Özdemir, A., Erdem, M., Kosunalp, S., and Iliev, T. (2025). Evaluation of Sustainable and Intelligent Transportation Processes Considering Environmental, Social, and Risk Assessment Pillars Employing an Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy-Embedded Decision-Making Methodology. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17072945 ↗
21. Societal Risk Acceptance Criteria of the Global General Cargo Ships10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112162 ↗
22. Systemic Risks: A Homomorphic Approach on the Basis of Complexity Science10.1007/s13753-018-0185-6 ↗
23. A Modified Social Force Model for Pedestrian-Bicycle Mixed Flows and Its Application on Evaluating the Conflict Risk in Shared Roads10.1016/j.physa.2024.129788 ↗
24. A Rapid Analysis Method for Regional Population Distribution Safety Based on Societal Risk Assessment10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105447 ↗
25. A Universal Approach for Evaluating Earthquake Safety Level Based on Societal Fatality Risk10.1007/s10518-019-00727-9 ↗
26. Risk Evaluation of Submarine Pipelines Using Improved FMEA Model Based on Social Network Analysis and Extended GLDS Method under a Linguistic Z-Number Preference Relation Environment10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105611 ↗
27. Risk Management of Green Supply Chains for Agricultural Products Based on Social Network Evaluation Framework10.1002/bse.3731 ↗
28. Societal Risk Evaluation for Landslides: Historical Synthesis and Proposed Tools10.1007/s10346-020-01547-8 ↗
29. Urban Flood Risk Evaluation Using Social Media Data and Bayesian Network Approach: A Spatial-Temporal Dynamic Analysis in Wuhan City, China10.1016/j.scs.2025.106388 ↗
30. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 ↗
31. Stakeholder Judgments of Value10.1017/beq.2016.28 ↗
32. Perceived Risk, Real Risk: Social Science and the Art of Probabilistic Risk Assessment10.1126/science.3175635 ↗
33. Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance for Risk Communication10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00219.x ↗
34. The Social Amplification of Risk Framework: New Perspectives10.1111/risa.13926 ↗
35. Construction Risk Probability Assessment of Shield Tunneling Projects in Karst Areas Based on Improved Two-Dimensional Cloud Model10.1016/j.tust.2024.106086 ↗