A Stepwise Calibration Method for Microscopic Traffic Simulation in Continuous-Flow Tunnel Scenarios Based on Macro- and Mesoscopic Indicators
Source abstract
Abstract
Microscopic traffic simulation is widely used to evaluate traffic operations in continuous-flow tunnel scenarios. However, conventional calibration methods mainly rely on aggregate indicators such as average speed or traffic flow. Under constrained geometric conditions, stable lane-use patterns, and mixed passenger car and truck operations, different parameter combinations may reproduce similar macroscopic traffic states while generating different car-following behaviors. Therefore, aggregate-indicator-based calibration alone cannot ensure behavioral realism. The principal contribution of this study is a stepwise macro- and mesoscopic calibration framework that first constrains car-following behavior using the Speed Gap Function (SGF) and then refines the macroscopic traffic state using the Speed Distribution Function (SDF). The SGF characterizes the relationship between vehicle speed and net spacing, thereby capturing longitudinal interactions often overlooked in conventional calibration, whereas SDF describes the cumulative speed distribution. Latin Hypercube Sampling and VISSIM batch simulations are used to generate a dataset for 19 driving behavior parameters, and multilayer perceptron surrogate models are trained to improve optimization efficiency. Single-objective, simultaneous multi-objective, and stepwise calibration schemes are compared. The SGF-priority stepwise scheme achieves the most balanced performance, with SGF and SDF MAPE values of 12.00% and 11.53%, respectively, corresponding to average relative discrepancies of approximately 12% in reproducing the two calibration curves. An independent capacity pressure test used for external validation yields a deviation of only −1.84%, indicating that the simulated capacity is within 2% of the reference value. Overall, the proposed framework improves behavioral consistency and engineering applicability under high-demand tunnel conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Transportation Planning and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Traffic Safety Research Center, Research Institute of Highway, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China
Funding
Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Barceló, J. (2010). Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation, Springer.
2. PTV Group (2024). PTV Vissim User Manual, PTV Planung Transport Verkehr GmbH.
3. Dowling, R., Skabardonis, A., and Alexiadis, V. (2004). Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software, Federal Highway Administration.
4. Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic simulation tools: Stockholm case study10.3141/1831-08 ↗
5. Calibration of microscopic traffic simulation models with aggregate data10.3141/1876-02 ↗
6. Yang, L., Wang, C., and Li, Z. (2022). Tunnel traffic evolution during capacity drop based on high-resolution vehicle trajectory data. Algorithms, 15.10.3390/a15070240 ↗
7. Understanding the traffic flow in different types of freeway tunnels based on car-following behaviors analysis10.1016/j.tust.2023.105494 ↗
8. A calibration procedure for increasing the accuracy of microscopic traffic simulation models10.1177/0037549716673723 ↗
9. Online calibration for microscopic traffic simulation and dynamic multi-step prediction of traffic speed10.1016/j.trc.2016.04.006 ↗
10. Calibration of microscopic traffic flow simulation models considering subsets of links and parameters10.1155/2020/8897141 ↗
11. Enhancing parameter calibration for micro-simulation models: Investigating improvement methods10.1016/j.simpat.2024.102950 ↗
12. Afshari, A., Lee, J., Besenski, D., Dimitrijevic, B., and Spasovic, L. (2025). Calibrating microscopic traffic simulation model using connected vehicle data and genetic algorithm. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15031496 ↗
13. Calibration of microscopic traffic simulation models: Methods and application10.3141/1999-21 ↗
14. Vehicle trajectory-based calibration procedure for microsimulation10.1177/03611981221124597 ↗
15. Capitalizing on drone videos to calibrate simulation models for signalized intersections and roundabouts10.1177/03611981221096120 ↗
16. Calibration method for microscopic traffic simulation considering lane difference10.1177/00375497241268740 ↗
17. Medina, J.C., Malekloo, A., Kersavage, K., Porter, R.J., and Liu, X.C. (2024). Verification and Calibration of Microscopic Traffic Simulation Using Driver Behavior and Car-Following Metrics for Freeway Segments, Federal Highway Administration. Report No. FHWA-HRT-24-103.
18. Calibration of a microscopic simulation model for emission calculation10.1016/j.trc.2012.04.008 ↗
19. Microscopic calibration and validation of car-following models: A systematic approach10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.050 ↗
20. A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation10.1016/0191-2615(81)90037-0 ↗
21. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805 ↗
22. Jiang, R., Hu, M.B., Zhang, H.M., Gao, Z.Y., Jia, B., Wu, Q.S., Wang, B., and Yang, M. (2014). Traffic experiment reveals the nature of car-following. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0094351 ↗
23. Calibration of a micro-traffic simulation model with respect to the spatial-temporal evolution of expressway on-ramp bottlenecks10.1177/0037549716645197 ↗
24. Bayesian calibration of the intelligent driver model10.1109/TITS.2024.3354102 ↗
25. Determining desired speeds from vehicle trajectory data10.1177/03611981241236793 ↗
26. Integrated self-consistent macro–micro traffic flow modeling and calibration framework based on trajectory data10.1016/j.trc.2023.104439 ↗
27. A multi-objective approach for the calibration of microscopic traffic flow simulation models10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999081 ↗
28. A simulation-based optimization framework for urban transportation problems10.1287/opre.2013.1226 ↗
29. Calibrating microscopic car-following models for adaptive cruise control vehicles: Multiobjective approach10.1061/JTEPBS.0000475 ↗
30. Daguano, R.F., Yoshioka, L.R., Netto, M.L., Marte, C.L., Isler, C.A., Santos, M.M.D., and Justo, J.F. (2023). Automatic calibration of microscopic traffic simulation models using artificial neural networks. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23218798 ↗
31. Parallel-computing-based calibration for microscopic traffic simulation model10.1177/03611981231184244 ↗
32. Two-stage calibration and optimization method for microscopic traffic simulation model parameters based on neural network surrogate models