journal article·2026-07-03Open access

Clinical Evaluation of Torque Protocols on the Stability of 3D-Printed Anatomical Healing Abutments

Ioannis Vergoullis, LeRoy Horton, Panagiotis Lampropoulos, Nikolaos Soldatos

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 13

Abstract

(1) Background: Customized 3D-printed anatomical healing abutments (AHAs) are increasingly incorporated into digital implant workflows to optimize emergence profile development. However, the influence of tightening torque on their mechanical stability remains poorly understood. This prospective pilot clinical study evaluated the effect of different torque protocols on the stability of 3D-printed AHA placed on intermediate abutments. (2) Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients (52.4 ± 12.3 years) receiving 60 Paltop implants (Paltop Advanced Dental Solutions Ltd., Ashkelon, Israel) were included. Following implant uncovering, all implants received titanium intermediate abutments fabricated from a photopolymerized acrylate-based resin (MAZIC D TEMP; Vericom Co., Ltd., Chuncheon, Republic of Korea), torqued to 35 Ncm, and were allocated to four AHA tightening protocols. Clinical mobility, torque maintenance, and mechanical complications were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Group comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test. (3) Results: At 12 weeks, mobility occurred in 5/15 AHA (33.3%) in the hand-tightened group and 1/15 AHA (6.7%) in the 20 Ncm group, whereas no mobility was observed in 15/15 AHA (100%) in both the 25 Ncm and 30 Ncm groups. Mechanical complications differed significantly among groups (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.047). (4) Conclusions: Tightening torques ≥ 25 Ncm provided superior early mechanical stability of 3D-printed AHA.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Periodontics, Louisiana State University (LSU) School of Dentistry, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA

Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, WA 98901, USA

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece

Division of Periodontology, Department of Regenerative and Reconstructive Sciences, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 2730 SW Moody Ave., Portland, OR 97201, USA

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Structure, biology, and function of peri-implant soft tissues in health and disease: A comprehensive review of the literature10.5051/jpis.2402080104 ↗
2. Peri-implant tissue management after immediate implant placement using a customized healing abutment10.1111/jerd.12512 ↗
3. Chokaree, P., Poovarodom, P., Chaijareenont, P., and Rungsiyakull, P. (2024). Effect of customized and prefabricated healing abutments on peri-implant soft tissue and bone in immediate implant sites: A randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13030886 ↗
4. Beretta, M., Poli, P.P., Pieriboni, S., Tansella, S., Manfredini, M., Cicciù, M., and Maiorana, C. (2019). Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning by means of customized healing abutment: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12183041 ↗
5. Systematic review of peri-implant conditions and aesthetic outcomes of customized versus conventional healing abutments10.1186/s40729-024-00581-8 ↗
6. Elgendi, M.M., Hamdy, I.S.E., and Sallam, H.I. (2025). Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning of immediate posterior implants by CAD-CAM socket sealing abutments: A randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health, 25.10.1186/s12903-024-05417-w ↗
7. Peri-implant tissue definition and registration with a 3D-printed emergence profile former on titanium stock healing abutment: A dental technique and clinical report
8. Clinical advances in implant transmucosal contouring for single implant sites: Prosthetic and biologic considerations
9. Abutment Disconnection/Reconnection Affects Peri-implant Marginal Bone Levels: A Meta-Analysis10.11607/jomi.5367 ↗
10. The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: A short-term randomized controlled clinical trial10.11607/jomi.3022 ↗
11. One abutment one time vs. repeatable abutment disconnections in implants, restored with cemented/screw retained fixed partial dentures: Marginal bone level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis
12. Effect of customized healing abutments on the peri-implant linear and volumetric tissue changes at maxillary immediate implant sites: A 1-year prospective randomized clinical trial10.1111/cid.13044 ↗
13. Lertwongpaisan, T., Amornsettachai, P., Panyayong, W., and Suphangul, S. (2023). Soft tissue dimensional change using customized titanium healing abutment in immediate implant placement in posterior teeth. BMC Oral Health, 23.10.1186/s12903-023-03060-5 ↗
14. In vitro evaluation of manual torque values applied to implant-abutment complex by different clinicians and abutment screw loosening
15. Vinhas, A.S., Aroso, C., Salazar, F., Relvas, M., Braga, A.C., Ríos-Carrasco, B., Gil, J., Rios-Santos, J.V., Fernández-Palacín, A., and Herrero-Climent, M. (2022). In vitro study of preload loss in different implant abutment connection designs. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15041392 ↗
16. Influence of abutment screw-tightening methods on the screw joint: Immediate and long-term stability10.1155/2024/5768318 ↗
17. Microleakage along the implant-abutment interface: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies10.1186/s40729-023-00494-y ↗
18. Micro-CT evaluation of microgaps at implant-abutment connection10.3390/ma16124491 ↗
19. D’Ercole, S., Dotta, T.C., Farani, M.R., Etemadi, N., Iezzi, G., Comuzzi, L., Piattelli, A., and Petrini, M. (2022). Bacterial microleakage at the implant-abutment interface: An in vitro study. Bioengineering, 9.10.3390/bioengineering9070277 ↗
20. Correlation between microleakage and screw loosening at implant-abutment connection10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.35 ↗
21. Effect of implant abutment connection designs and implant diameters on screw loosening before and after cyclic loading: An in vitro study10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.026 ↗
22. Microleakage at the implant-abutment interface with different tightening torques in vitro10.1590/S1678-77572012000500015 ↗
23. Management of abutment screw loosening: Review of literature and report of a case10.1007/s13191-013-0330-2 ↗
24. Tightening of healing abutments: Influence of torque on bacterial proliferation risk, an in vitro investigation10.1515/bmt-2013-0142 ↗
25. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0067:TRBIPA>2.3.CO;2 ↗
26. Review of the mechanical behavior of different implant-abutment connections10.3390/ijerph17228685 ↗
27. Microleakage of the prosthetic abutment/implant interface with internal and external connection: An in vitro study10.1111/clr.12217 ↗
28. Screw loosening and changes in removal torque relative to abutment screw length in a dental implant with external abutment connection after oblique cyclic loading10.4047/jap.2018.10.6.415 ↗
29. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface10.1067/mpr.2001.112796 ↗
30. World Medical Association (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA, 310, 2191–2194.
31. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) (2016). Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2), International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.
32. Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: Overview10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0242:ISMATS>2.3.CO;2 ↗
33. Fisher, R.A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver and Boyd.
34. On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P10.2307/2340521 ↗
35. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 ↗
36. Torque generated by handheld screwdrivers and mechanical torquing devices for osseointegrated implants
37. Implant–abutment connection as contributing factor to peri-implant diseases10.1111/prd.12289 ↗
38. Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: An in vitro study10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02165.x ↗
39. Effects of tightening torque on screw stress and formation of implant-abutment microgaps: A finite element analysis10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.026 ↗
40. Effect of dental implant macrogeometry on the probability of survival and strain distribution of an implant–abutment set10.17219/dmp/174298 ↗
41. Letter to the editor regarding “Digital workflow for low-cost 3D-printed custom healing abutment based on emergence profile CBCT segmentation”10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.034 ↗
42. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: A cost/time analysis10.1111/clr.12476 ↗
43. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: A randomized crossover trial10.1111/clr.12600 ↗