Publicly Auditable Zero-Trust Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Intrusion Detection in Implantable Medical Device Ecosystems
Source abstract
Abstract
Implantable medical device (IMD) and Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) environments need intrusion detection systems that learn across distributed hospitals without centralizing sensitive data, while controlling admission, protecting shared model artifacts, filtering unreliable contributors, and supporting post-run auditability. However, many secure federated learning designs treat identity, privacy, robustness, and evidence verification as separate layers, leaving a gap between privacy-preserving execution and public accountability. This paper presents an implemented zero-trust hierarchical federated learning-based intrusion detection system (FL-IDS) framework for IMD/IoMT security analytics. Hospital clients train eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) detectors; self-sovereign identity gates participation; contribution-level differential privacy (DP) perturbs exported booster leaf weights; country aggregators apply adaptive Krum-inspired selection; and the global server performs trust-weighted prediction-level fusion. The evidence layer binds artifacts using Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm signatures, canonical hashes, Merkle roots, decentralized publication, Ethereum Sepolia anchoring, and standalone auditor verification. The framework is evaluated on WUSTL-EHMS-2020, ECU-IoHT, and CICIoMT2024 under paired DP-disabled and DP-enabled modes. Under DP-enabled execution, CICIoMT2024 achieved an F1-score of 0.998789 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.999814, ECU-IoHT achieved an AUROC of 0.999337, and WUSTL-EHMS-2020 remained DP-sensitive with an F1-score of 0.422880 and AUROC of 0.776685. All paired evidence runs passed standalone auditor verification, demonstrating that privacy-preserving learning and public accountability can be integrated within a single experimental FL-IDS pipeline.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wireless Body Area Networks · Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Network Security and Intrusion Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Türkiye
College of Law, University of Babylon, Hillah 51002, Babylon, Iraq
Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul 34403, Türkiye
Funding
Istanbul Atlas University
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. A Comprehensive Survey on Impact of Applying Various Technologies on the Internet of Medical Things10.1007/s10462-024-11063-z ↗
2. A Secured Remote Patient Monitoring Framework for IoMT Ecosystems10.1038/s41598-025-04774-y ↗
3. Villegas-Ch, W., García-Ortiz, J., and Urbina-Camacho, I. (2023). Framework for a Secure and Sustainable Internet of Medical Things, Requirements, Design Challenges, and Future Trends. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13116634 ↗
4. Enhancing Remote Patient Monitoring with AI-Driven IoMT and Cloud Computing Technologies10.1038/s41598-025-09727-z ↗
5. Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Disease Management
6. Tomer, V., and Sharma, S. (2024). Resilience in the Internet of Medical Things: A Review and Case Study. Future Internet, 16.10.3390/fi16110430 ↗
7. ENISA (2026, May 25). ENISA Threat Landscape: Health Sector. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity Report. Available online: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/health-threat-landscape.
8. Catuogno, L., and Galdi, C. (2024). Implantable Medical Device Security. Cryptography, 8.10.3390/cryptography8040053 ↗
9. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) (2026, May 25). Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Web Page, Available online: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html.
10. European Union (2026, May 25). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016, General Data Protection Regulation. EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng.
11. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026, May 25). Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality Management System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cybersecurity-medical-devices-quality-management-system-considerations-and-content-premarket.
12. Enhancing Internet of Medical Things Security with Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108036 ↗
13. Intrusion Detection System for Healthcare Systems Using Medical and Network Data: A Comparison Study10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000421 ↗
14. Ulloa-Zamora, M., Barría-Huidobro, C., Sánchez-Rubio, M., and Galeazzi, L. (2025). Integral Security Pillars for Medical Devices: A Comprehensive Analysis. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15126634 ↗
15. Federated Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Clinical Applications and Technical Architecture10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101419 ↗
16. Begum, K., Mozumder, M.A.I., Joo, M.I., and Kim, H.C. (2024). BFLIDS: Blockchain-Driven Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in IoMT Networks. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24144591 ↗
17. Privacy Preserving Verifiable Federated Learning Scheme Using Blockchain and Homomorphic Encryption10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112405 ↗
18. Secure and Verifiable Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attacks in IoMT10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109900 ↗
19. Securing IoMT Healthcare Systems with Federated Learning and BigchainDB10.1016/j.future.2024.107609 ↗
20. An Effective Federated Learning Approach for Secure and Private Scalable Intrusion Detection on the Internet of Vehicles10.1002/cpe.70160 ↗
21. Utilising Blockchain Technology and Federated Learning on the Internet of Vehicles for the Preservation of Security and Privacy: Systematic Review10.1504/IJWGS.2024.143173 ↗
22. Zhu, X., and Li, H. (2025). Privacy-Preserving Poisoning-Resistant Blockchain-Based Federated Learning for Data Sharing in the Internet of Medical Things. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15105472 ↗
23. Benabderrahmane, F., Kerkouche, E., and Bouchemal, N. (2026). Risk-Aware Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for Remote Patient Monitoring: A Multi-Layer Adaptive Security Framework. Appl. Sci., 16.10.3390/app16010029 ↗
24. Alharthi, H.S., Alshehri, S., and Kalkatawi, M. (2025). Blockchain-Enabled Hierarchical Federated Learning Framework for Anomaly Detection in IoT Systems. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152413037 ↗
25. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2026, June 21). Zero Trust Architecture, Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-207.pdf.
26. In Search of Self-Sovereign Identity Leveraging Blockchain Technology10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2931173 ↗
27. The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy10.1561/0400000042 ↗
28. Blanchard, P., El Mhamdi, E.M., Guerraoui, R., and Stainer, J. (2017, January 4–9). Machine Learning with Adversaries: Byzantine Tolerant Gradient Descent. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA. Available online: https://papers.nips.cc/paper/6617-machine-learning-with-adversaries-byzantine-tolerant-gradient-descent.
29. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2026, May 22). Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard, Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.204.pdf.
30. Benet, J. (2014). IPFS: Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System. arXiv.
31. Buterin, V. (2026, May 25). Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. White Paper. Available online: https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/.
32. Ethereum Foundation (2026, May 25). Ethereum Developer Documentation: Networks and Testnets. Online Documentation. Available online: https://ethereum.org/developers/docs/networks/.
33. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
34. Beutel, D.J., Topal, T., Mathur, A., Qiu, X., Fernandez-Marques, J., Gao, Y., Sani, L., Li, K.H., Parcollet, T., and de Gusmão, P.P.B. (2026, May 25). Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Framework. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.14390.
35. W3C (2026, May 25). Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0. W3C Recommendation. Available online: https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/.
36. W3C (2026, May 25). Verifiable Credentials Data Model 2.0. W3C Recommendation. Available online: https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/.
37. Rundgren, A., Jordan, B., and Erdtman, S. (2026, May 25). RFC 8785: JSON Canonicalization Scheme (JCS). Available online: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8785.
38. Merkle, R.C. (1988). A Digital Signature Based on a Conventional Encryption Function. Proceedings of the Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO ’87, Springer.10.1007/3-540-48184-2_32 ↗
39. (2026, May 25). NoKnow Python Library: ZKSignature and ZKData. GitHub Repository. Available online: https://github.com/GoodiesHQ/noknow-python.
40. (2026, May 25). Pinata API Reference: Pin JSON to IPFS. Online Documentation. Available online: https://docs.pinata.cloud/api-reference/endpoint/ipfs/pin-json-to-ipfs.
41. ECU-IoHT: A Dataset for Analyzing Cyberattacks in Internet of Health Things10.1016/j.adhoc.2021.102621 ↗
42. CICIoMT2024: A Benchmark Dataset for Multi-Protocol Security Assessment in IoMT10.1016/j.iot.2024.101351 ↗
43. Blockchain Framework with IoT Device Using Federated Learning for Sustainable Healthcare Systems10.1038/s41598-025-06539-z ↗
44. Enhanced Federated Learning for Secure Medical Data Collaboration10.1186/s40543-025-00484-2 ↗
45. Secure Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Based on ECMQV-MAC Authentication Protocol and EKMC-SCP Blockchain Networking10.1016/j.ins.2023.119783 ↗
46. A Lightweight Scalable Hybrid Authentication Framework for Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Using Blockchain Hyperledger Consortium Network with Edge Computing10.1038/s41598-025-05130-w ↗
47. Advanced Federated Ensemble Internet of Learning Approach for Cloud Based Medical Healthcare Monitoring System10.1038/s41598-024-77196-x ↗
48. Feng, S., Gao, L., and Shi, L. (2025). CGFL: A Robust Federated Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Data Generation. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15052416 ↗
49. Youm, S., and Kim, T. (2025). Enhancing Federated Intrusion Detection with Class-Specific Dynamic Sampling. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15095067 ↗
50. Quantum Secure Authentication Scheme for Internet of Medical Things Using Blockchain10.1109/JIOT.2024.3448212 ↗
51. Roosan, D., Khan, R., Nirzhor, S., and Hai, F. (2025). Post-Quantum Cryptography Resilience in Telehealth Using Quantum Key Distribution. Blockchain Healthc. Today Platf. Approaches J., 8.10.30953/bhty.v8.379 ↗
52. QB-IMD: A Secure Medical Data Processing System with Privacy Protection Based on Quantum Blockchain for IoMT10.1109/JIOT.2023.3285388 ↗
53. Fusion of Machine Learning and Blockchain-Based Privacy-Preserving Approach for Healthcare Data in the Internet of Things10.1007/s11227-024-06392-3 ↗
54. Reis, M.J.C.S. (2025). Edge-FLGuard: A Federated Learning Framework for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in 5G-Enabled IoT Ecosystems. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15126452 ↗
55. Enhancing Physical Security in IIoMT Environments10.1016/j.iot.2025.101653 ↗
56. Leveraging Blockchain and IoMT for Secure and Interoperable Electronic Health Records10.1038/s41598-025-95531-8 ↗
57. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique10.1613/jair.953 ↗
58. Imbalanced-learn: A Python Toolbox to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning
59. Last, F., Douzas, G., and Bacao, F. (2017). Oversampling for Imbalanced Learning Based on K-Means and SMOTE. arXiv.
60. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2026, May 22). Secure Hash Standard, Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.180-4.pdf.
61. An Introduction to ROC Analysis10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 ↗
62. Saito, T., and Rehmsmeier, M. (2015). The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0118432 ↗
63. Verification of Forecasts Expressed in Terms of Probability10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2 ↗
64. On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks