journal article·2026-06-30Open access

Fully Digital Guided Single-Stage Maxillectomy and Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation After Recurrent Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report

Giada Anna Beltramini, Francesco Zingari, Francesco Montan, Margherita Tumedei, Massimo Del Fabbro, Alessandro Remigio Bolzoni

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 13

Abstract

Background: The rehabilitation of patients who have undergone extensive maxillectomy for neoplastic lesions is a significant clinical challenge. The resulting anatomical and functional defects severely impact quality of life, and traditional removable prostheses often lack stability. Zygomatic implants offer a viable solution by providing stable anchorage in the zygomatic bone, bypassing the need for bone reconstruction. Methods: This case report details the rehabilitation of a 62-year-old female patient with a history of recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma. A fully digital workflow, including CBCT and CAD/CAM technology, was used for meticulous surgical and prosthetic planning. The surgical procedure involved a guided maxillectomy, a free forearm flap reconstruction, and the simultaneous placement of two zygomatic implants and one conventional implant. The procedure was done with EZGOMA guided surgery, which, starting from the EZPLAN software design of zygomatic and traditional implants, allowed us to determine the implant’s position in the three-dimensional axes and also the position of the internal hexagon. This allowed us to design the implant beneath the diagnostic wax-up in the three axes, and also to calculate the degrees of inclination of the multi-unit abutment. Results: All implants achieved primary stability with a torque exceeding 45 Ncm. The patient received an immediate provisional prosthesis, which allowed for the rapid restoration of phonetic and esthetic function. The post-operative course was uneventful, with no complications. Follow-up imaging confirmed the successful integration of the implants and the absence of any prosthetic or surgical issues at 24-month successful follow-up. Conclusions: This case suggests that implant-supported rehabilitation with zygomatic implants can be a highly effective treatment for patients with severe maxillary defects following cancer surgery. By using an integrated surgical and prosthetic strategy, along with advanced digital technology, we can achieve fast, safe, and predictable results. This approach successfully restores both function and esthetics, even in challenging anatomical situations. The auxilium of guided plates is a helpful aid for both implant placement and managing bone resection during cancer surgery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Dental Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milano, Italy

Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via della Commenda 10, 20122 Milan, Italy

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Galeazzi Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. An Alternative Prosthetic Approach for Rehabilitation of Two Edentulous Maxillectomy Patients: Clinical Report10.1111/jopr.12617 ↗
2. A Practical Approach to Orofacial Rehabilitation in a Patient after Inferior Maxillectomy and Rhinectomy with Mono Framework Construction Supported on a Zygomatic Implant Placed in the Glabella: A Case Report10.1186/s40902-021-00312-8 ↗
3. Maxillary Resection for Cancer, Zygomatic Implants Insertion, and Palatal Repair as Single-Stage Procedure: Report of Three Cases10.1186/s40902-017-0112-6 ↗
4. Short Dental Implants: A Scoping Review of the Literature for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.003 ↗
5. A Protocol for Maxillary Reconstruction Following Oncology Resection Using Zygomatic Implants
6. Functional and Aesthetic Rehabilitation with Maxillary Prosthesis Supported by Two Zygomatic Implants for Maxillary Defect Resulting from Cancer Ablative Surgery: A Case Report/Technique Article10.1007/s10266-015-0222-5 ↗
7. Pterygoid Implants for Maxillofacial Rehabilitation of a Patient with a Bilateral Maxillectomy Defect10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00181 ↗
8. Reconstruction of High Maxillectomy Defects with the Fibula Osteomyocutaneous Flap in Combination with Titanium Mesh or a Zygomatic Implant10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fad2d3 ↗
9. Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Zygomatic Implants after Maxillectomy: A Systematic Review
10. The Use of Zygomatic Implants for Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Severely Resorbed Maxilla
11. Lorusso, F., Conte, R., Inchingolo, F., Festa, F., and Scarano, A. (2021). Survival Rate of Zygomatic Implants for Fixed Oral Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes between Zygomatic and Regular Implants. Dent. J., 9.10.3390/dj9040038 ↗
12. Frequency and Type of Digital Procedures Used for the Intraoral Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.025 ↗
13. CAD-CAM Surgically-Guided Oral Implant Site Expansion and Implant Placement in Severely Atrophic Maxilla
14. A Novel Guided Zygomatic Implant Surgery System Compared to Free Hand: A Human Cadaver Study on Accuracy10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103942 ↗
15. Antonelli, A., Bennardo, F., Brancaccio, Y., Barone, S., Femiano, F., Nucci, L., Minervini, G., Fortunato, L., Attanasio, F., and Giudice, A. (2020). Can Bone Compaction Improve Primary Implant Stability? An In Vitro Comparative Study with Osseodensification Technique. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10238623 ↗
16. Can the Bone Density Estimated by CBCT Predict the Primary Stability of Dental Implants? A New Measurement Protocol10.1097/SCS.0000000000006991 ↗
17. Clinical Methodologies for Achieving Primary Dental Implant Stability: The Effects of Alveolar Bone Density10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0071 ↗
18. Zygomatic Implants in Avulsive and Ablative Defects10.1016/j.cxom.2021.05.001 ↗
19. The Long-Term Use of Zygomatic Implants: A 10-Year Clinical and Radiographic Report10.1111/cid.12007 ↗
20. Dental Implants in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Radiotherapy on Implant Survival10.1111/clr.13976 ↗
21. Radiotherapy and the Survival of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.09.006 ↗
22. ITI Consensus Report on Zygomatic Implants: Indications, Evaluation of Surgical Techniques and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9 ↗
23. Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Patients with Maxillary Oncology Defects Using Zygomatic Implants10.1186/s40729-024-00545-y ↗
24. Mavriqi, L., Lorusso, F., Conte, R., Rapone, B., and Scarano, A. (2021). Zygomatic Implant Penetration to the Central Portion of Orbit: A Case Report. BMC Ophthalmol., 21.10.1186/s12886-021-01846-1 ↗
25. Survival and Complications of Zygomatic Implants: A Systematic Review10.1007/s10006-012-0331-z ↗
26. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation with Zygomatic Implants in an Oncologic Patient: A Case Report10.1016/j.joms.2019.10.006 ↗
27. Zygomatic Implant-Based Rehabilitation for Patients with Maxillary and Mid-Facial Oncology Defects: A Review10.1111/odi.13305 ↗
28. Position of Digitally Guided Implants in Completely Edentulous Maxillae by Using a Modified Double-Scan and Overlap of Three Digital Surface Protocol
29. Satisfaction Grade Assessment of Patients Treated with Zygomatic Implants with Self-Tapping Apex and Machined Body10.23812/19-9239-L ↗
30. Guided Placement of Zygomatic Implants in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Implant Survival and Patient Outcomes at 1–3 Years of Follow-Up10.1016/j.ijom.2024.03.001 ↗