AI-Driven Threat Detection and Automated Incident Response for Securing Cloud Workloads
Source abstract
Abstract
The increasing adoption of cloud computing has expanded organizational attack surfaces and created additional opportunities for identity abuse, ransomware operations, data exposure, and configuration-related security incidents. Conventional monitoring environments based primarily on static rules, fragmented telemetry, and manual triage often struggle to prioritize high-severity incidents in real time. This study evaluates the operational impact of an integrated AI-augmented cloud-native SIEM/XDR/SOAR architecture for cloud threat detection and automated incident response. A sequential mixed-methods comparative case study was conducted across two enterprise-style security environments: an AI-augmented architecture combining cloud-native SIEM, XDR telemetry unification, behavioral analytics, AI-assisted correlation, generative-AI analyst support, and SOAR automation, and a conventional baseline environment based on manual triage and signature-based controls. Three attack scenarios were analyzed: phishing-led account takeover, multi-stage ransomware, and shadow-IT data exfiltration. The AI-augmented architecture reduced mean time to triage from 17.4 h in the conventional baseline to 10.7 min and enabled ransomware containment in under five minutes through pre-configured automated response playbooks. The results also showed improved prioritization of high-severity incidents, reduced analyst review burden, and a high automated closure rate. The findings provide operational evidence for the evaluated security architecture. Limitations include single-vendor dependency, non-equivalent false-positive classification mechanisms, proprietary model internals, calibration requirements, and detection gaps involving legitimate third-party services and password-protected content.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Information and Cyber Security · Cloud Data Security Solutions · Network Security and Intrusion Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science, Varna Free University “Chernorizets Hrabar”, 84 Yanko Slavchev Street, Chaika Resort, 9007 Varna, Bulgaria
Department of Communication and Computer Engineering, South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, 66 Ivan Mihailov Street, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
Department of Informational and Communication Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy, 73 Vasil Drumev, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria
Funding
South-West University “Neofit Rilski”
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Gartner (2026, May 10). Gartner Forecasts Worldwide Public Cloud End-User Spending to Total $723 Billion in 2025. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-19-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-public-cloud-end-user-spending-to-total-723-billion-dollars-in-2025.
2. SentinelOne (2026, May 10). Cloud Security Statistics 2024. Available online: https://www.sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/cloud-security/cloud-security-statistics/.
3. Alert Fatigue in Security Operations Centres: Research Challenges and Opportunities10.1145/3723158 ↗
4. Advancing Cyber Threat Detection through SIEM-Based Automation and MITRE ATT&CK Aligned Analytics: A Systematic Review10.9734/ajrcos/2026/v19i1816 ↗
5. A Systematic Literature Review on Intrusion Detection Techniques in Cloud Computing10.1007/s10791-025-09641-y ↗
6. A Comprehensive Review of AI Based Intrusion Detection System10.1016/j.measen.2023.100827 ↗
7. ENISA (2023). ENISA Threat Landscape 2023, European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. Available online: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2023.
8. (2026, May 10). New Study Finds 84% of Security Professionals Experienced an API Security Incident. Available online: https://www.akamai.com/newsroom/press-release/new-study-finds-84-of-security-professionals-experienced-an-api-security-incident-in-the-past-year.
9. ISC2 (2026, May 10). ISC2 2024 Cybersecurity Workforce Study. Available online: https://www.isc2.org/Insights/2024/10/ISC2-2024-Cybersecurity-Workforce-Study.
10. Ban, T., Takahashi, T., Ndichu, S., and Inoue, D. (2023). Breaking Alert Fatigue: AI-Assisted SIEM Framework for Effective Incident Response. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13116610 ↗
11. González-Granadillo, G., González-Zarzosa, S., and Diaz, R. (2021). Security Information and Event Management (SIEM): Analysis, Trends, and Usage in Critical Infrastructures. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21144759 ↗
12. (2026, May 10). AI SIEM: Next-Gen SIEM Powered by AI. Available online: https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/cybersecurity-101/next-gen-siem/aisiem/.
13. Federated Security Control Data Fabric: Scalable Telemetry Normalization and Orchestration in Multi-Cloud Environments
14. Palo Alto Networks (2026, May 10). What is Extended Detection and Response (XDR)?. Available online: https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-extended-detection-response-XDR.
15. (2026, May 10). Market Guide: Extended Detection and Response. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/extended-detection-and-response.
16. Advanced AI and ML Techniques in Cybersecurity: Supervised and Unsupervised Learning, Reinforcement Learning and Neural Networks in Threat Detection and Response10.54254/2755-2721/82/2024GLG0054 ↗
17. Diogenes, Y., DiCola, N., and Turpijn, T. (2022). Microsoft Azure Sentinel: Planning and Implementing Microsoft’s Cloud-Native SIEM Solution, Microsoft Press.
18. Pitkar, H. (2025). Cloud Security Automation Through Symmetry: Threat Detection and Response. Symmetry, 17.10.3390/sym17060859 ↗
19. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in SOC Operations: Adoption, Perception, and Workforce Impact
20. Proactive Threat Detection in Enterprise Systems Using Wazuh: A MITRE ATT&CK Evaluation10.1016/j.cose.2025.104702 ↗
21. Farzaan, M.A.M., Ghanem, M.C., El-Hajjar, A., and Ratnayake, D.N. (2024). AI-Enabled System for Efficient and Effective Cyber Incident Detection and Response in Cloud Environments. arXiv.10.1109/TMLCN.2025.3564912 ↗
22. NIST (2018). Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (NIST CSF v1.1), National Institute of Standards and Technology.
23. Zero trust architecture
24. SmartTrust: A Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Real-Time Threat Detection in Cloud Environments Using Zero-Trust Architecture10.1186/s13677-025-00764-7 ↗
25. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance10.1002/smj.640 ↗
26. Creswell, J.W., and Plano Clark, V.L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, SAGE Publications. [3rd ed.].