journal article·2026-06-27Open access

MTL-Frame: An End-to-End Multi-Task Learning Framework for Student Profiling and Composite-Score Estimation

Guifen Jiang, Muhua Tan, Zhaohui Yuan

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 13

Abstract

Composite-score estimation (or assessment auditing) and student profiling are two fundamental tasks in Educational Data Mining (EDM). However, existing studies often treat them as separate problems, typically adopting a sequential pipeline in which clustering is first performed and then used for downstream estimation. Such a fragmented paradigm limits the interaction between latent student-group structures and supervised outcome signals, particularly in low-data educational scenarios. To address this limitation, this study proposes “MTL-Frame”, an end-to-end multi-task learning framework that jointly optimizes student profiling and composite-score estimation. MTL-Frame integrates prototype-based contrastive clustering with context-aware regression to directly inject student profile priors into grade estimation. A dispersion regularization and dynamic loss weighting ensure training stability. Experiments conducted on a real-world blended English-course dataset involving 429 university students show that MTL-Frame outperforms representative single-task regression baselines, including XGBoost, Random Forest, SVR, and LSTM, achieving an RMSE of 1.7532, an MAE of 0.8168, and R2 = 0.9812. While this high R2 partly reflects the model’s ability to learn the deterministic scoring aggregation, the performance remains strong even when the final exam score is excluded from the inputs (R2 = 0.9681), confirming genuine estimation capability. Compared to the strongest single-task baseline (XGBoost), MTL-Frame reduces RMSE by 38.2%. The model also obtains a Silhouette Score of 0.3562, indicating its ability to generate meaningful student profiles while maintaining strong estimation accuracy. These results demonstrate that integrating unsupervised profiling priors into supervised estimation can improve model robustness and provide actionable insights for differentiated instructional intervention.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Online Learning and Analytics · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Student Assessment and Feedback

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Foreign Language, East China Jiaotong University, 808 East Shuanggang Rd., Nanchang 330013, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Education Department of Jiangxi Province

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Sosa-Díaz, M.J., Garrido-Arroyo, M.d.C., and González Delgado, M.Y. (2025). Transformation of Educational Models in Higher Education During and After “Emergency Remote Teaching”. Educ. Sci., 15.10.3390/educsci15091249 ↗
2. Data mining in education10.1002/widm.1075 ↗
3. Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline10.1177/0002764213498851 ↗
4. Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 201710.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599 ↗
5. A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments10.1007/s11257-011-9106-8 ↗
6. Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey10.1002/widm.1355 ↗
7. Deep clustering: A comprehensive survey10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3403155 ↗
8. A survey on multi-task learning10.1109/TKDE.2021.3070203 ↗
9. A systematic review of deep learning approaches to educational data mining10.1155/2019/1306039 ↗
10. Molnar, C. (2020). Interpretable Machine Learning, Lulu Press.
11. Zhao, S., and Sahebi, S. (2024). Multi-task modeling of student knowledge and behavior. 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM Digital Library.10.1145/3627673.3679823 ↗
12. Ruder, S. (2017). An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. arXiv.
13. From signals to knowledge: A conceptual model for multimodal learning analytics10.1111/jcal.12288 ↗
14. Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x ↗
15. Explainable artificial intelligence in education10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074 ↗
16. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv.
17. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x ↗
18. Enhancing student performance prediction via educational data mining on academic data
19. Shawareb, N., Ewais, A., and Dalipi, F. (2024). Utilizing Data Mining Techniques to Predict Students Performance Using Data Log from MOODLE, Arab American University.
20. Lai, X., Hao, W., Zhang, Z., and Bai, X. (2024). Predicting student performance with graph structure density-based graph neural networks. Machine Learning and Intelligent Computing, PMLR.
21. Predicting academic success in higher education: Literature review and best practices10.1186/s41239-020-0177-7 ↗
22. A hybrid machine learning approach for predicting student performance using multi-class educational datasets10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.108 ↗
23. Application of learning analytics using clustering data Mining for Students’ disposition analysis10.1007/s10639-017-9645-7 ↗
24. A machine learning based method for constructing group profiles of university students10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29181 ↗
25. Salles, I., Mejia-Domenzain, P., Swamy, V., Blackwell, J., and Käser, T. (2024). Interpret3C: Interpretable student clustering through individualized feature selection. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-64315-6_35 ↗
26. Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., and Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, ACM Digital Library.10.1145/2460296.2460330 ↗
27. Tiukhova, E., Vemuri, P., Óskarsdóttir, M., Poelmans, S., Baesens, B., and Snoeck, M. (2024). Discovering Unusual Study Patterns Using Anomaly Detection and XAI, University of Hawaii System.10.24251/HICSS.2024.178 ↗
28. Response speed enhanced fine-grained knowledge tracing: A multi-task learning perspective10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122107 ↗
29. Predictive student modeling in educational games with multi-task learning10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5406 ↗
30. Predicting student performance from LMS data: A comparison of 17 blended courses using Moodle LMS10.1109/TLT.2016.2616312 ↗
31. Student modeling approaches: A literature review for the last decade10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.007 ↗
32. Baashar, Y., Alkawsi, G., Mustafa, A., Alkahtani, A.A., Alsariera, Y.A., Ali, A.Q., Hashim, W., and Tiong, S.K. (2022). Toward predicting student’s academic performance using artificial neural networks (ANNs). Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031289 ↗
33. Multi-task learning for dense prediction tasks: A survey
34. Contrastive clustering10.1609/aaai.v35i10.17037 ↗
35. Li, J., Zhou, P., Xiong, C., and Hoi, S.C. (2020). Prototypical contrastive learning of unsupervised representations. arXiv.
36. Multimodal learning analytics and education data mining: Using computational technologies to measure complex learning tasks10.18608/jla.2016.32.11 ↗
37. Snell, J., Swersky, K., and Zemel, R. (2017). Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. arXiv.
38. Go4align: Group optimization for multi-task alignment10.52202/079017-3537 ↗
39. Kendall, A., Gal, Y., and Cipolla, R. (2018). Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE.
40. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM Digital Library.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
41. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
42. A tutorial on support vector regression10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
43. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
44. Arik, S.O., and Pfister, T. (2020). TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning. arXiv.10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 ↗
45. Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Data
46. McQueen, J.B. (1967). Some methods of classification and analysis of multivariate observations. 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California, Berkeley.
47. McLachlan, G.J., and Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471721182 ↗
48. A tutorial on spectral clustering10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z ↗
49. Xie, J., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016). Unsupervised deep embedding for clustering analysis. International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR.