journal article·2026-06-26Open access

Validation of a Low-Cost Accelerometry Device for Cycle-Based Biomechanical Analysis of Deep-Water Running

Caroline C. B. Souza, Franciele Parolini, Márcio Fagundes Goethel, Johan Robalino, Gisela Rocha de Siqueira, Alysson L. P. C. Silva, Marcus Vinícius B. Rodrigues, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, Miguel Velhote Correia, Marco Aurélio Benedetti Rodrigues, Ana Paula de Lima Ferreira

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 13

Abstract

Hydrotherapy is widely used in rehabilitation because it reduces mechanical loading while preserving neuromuscular and cardiovascular stimulation. However, the biomechanical characterization of deep-water running remains limited, particularly when using accessible wearable systems for cycle-based movement analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the concurrent validity and agreement of a low-cost accelerometry device for cycle-based analysis of deep-water running, using a commercial accelerometry system as the reference measurement system. Twenty-one healthy participants performed a 25 m deep-water running task with simultaneous data acquisition from mechanically coupled sensors to ensure alignment. A total of 75 synchronized cycles were processed using a standardized pipeline that included filtering, synchronization, cycle detection, and parameter extraction. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient, Spearman’s correlation, Bland–Altman analysis, and error metrics. The results showed good agreement for temporal and volumetric variables, including cycle duration (ICC = 0.84), cumulative acceleration (ICC = 0.82), and area under the curve (ICC = 0.68). However, lower agreement and systematic bias were observed for intensity-related variables, particularly RMS and peak acceleration, despite more than 92% of cycles falling within the 95% limits of agreement (LoA). These findings suggest that the proposed device provides acceptable agreement for temporal and volumetric variables during deep-water running and may represent a low-cost alternative for movement monitoring in aquatic environments. However, intensity-related variables should be interpreted with caution due to the systematic differences observed between systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Sports Performance and Training

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physical Therapy, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Avenida Jornalista Aníbal Fernandes, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife 50740-560, Brazil

Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal

Department of Physiotherapy, Northern School of Health Portuguese Red Cross, 3720-126 Oliveira de Azeméis, Portugal

Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

Center of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

Department of Electronics and Systems, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil

Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal

Funding

Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel · Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. The Properties of Water and their Applications for Training10.2478/hukin-2014-0129 ↗
2. Dai, S., Yuan, H., Wang, J., Yang, Y., and Wen, S. (2023). Effects of aquatic exercise on the improvement of lower-extremity motor function and quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis. Front. Physiol., 14.10.3389/fphys.2023.1066718 ↗
3. Effect of aquatic versus land motor dual task training on balance and gait of patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial10.3233/NRE-182636 ↗
4. The influence of the aquatic environment on the control of postural sway
5. Effectiveness of aquatic therapy on pain relief and functional mobility in knee osteoarthritis: A narrative review
6. The physiology of deep-water running10.1080/02640410310001641368 ↗
7. Kwok, M., So, B., Heywood, S., Lai, M., and Ng, S. (2022). Effectiveness of Deep Water Running on Improving Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Physical Function and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19159434 ↗
8. Biomechanics of human locomotion in water: An electomyographic analysis10.1097/JES.0b013e31817bfe73 ↗
9. Deep-Water Running: A Practical Review of the Literature with an Emphasis on Biomechanics10.3810/psm.2012.02.1958 ↗
10. Biomechanical characteristics of adults walking in shallow water and on land10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.013 ↗
11. Wearable technologies for monitoring aquatic exercises: A systematic review10.1177/02692155221141039 ↗
12. Monoli, C., Galli, M., and Tuhtan, J.A. (2024). Improving the reliability of underwater gait analysis using wearable pressure and inertial sensors. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0300100 ↗
13. Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units on Lower Extremity Kinematics During Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1186/s40798-022-00477-0 ↗
14. Feasibility Testing of Wearable Device for Musculoskeletal Monitoring during Aquatic Therapy and Rehabilitation
15. Validity and reliability of accelerations and orientations measured using wearable sensors during functional activities10.1038/s41598-022-18845-x ↗
16. Marinho, D., Neiva, H., and Morais, J. (2019). The Use of Wearable Sensors in Human Movement Analysis in Non-Swimming Aquatic Activities: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16245067 ↗
17. Wearable Biofeedback Suit to Promote and Monitor Aquatic Exercises: A Feasibility Study10.1109/TIM.2019.2911756 ↗
18. Motor Patterns in Human Walking and Running10.1152/jn.00081.2006 ↗
19. Matúš, I., Vadašová, B., Eliaš, T., Rydzik, Ł., Ambroży, T., and Czarny, W. (2025). Validity and Reliability of 2D Video Analysis for Swimming Kick Start Kinematics. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol., 10.10.3390/jfmk10020184 ↗
20. Using inertial sensors for position and orientation estimation10.1561/2000000094 ↗
21. Bias in Bland-Altman but not Regression Validity Analyses
22. Understanding Bland Altman analysis10.11613/BM.2015.015 ↗
23. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 ↗
24. Evaluating the Consistency of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Health Monitoring: A Comparison Under Free-Living Conditions10.2196/jmir.6874 ↗
25. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM
26. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 ↗
27. Human isometric force production and electromyogram activity of knee extensor muscles in water and on dry land10.1007/s004210050557 ↗
28. Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1186/s12984-020-00685-3 ↗
29. Kinematic analysis of gait in an underwater treadmill using land-based Vicon T 40s motion capture cameras arranged externally10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110553 ↗
30. Aquatic therapy: Scientific foundations and clinical rehabilitation applications10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.05.017 ↗
31. Variability in measurement of swimming forces: A meta-analysis of passive and active drag10.1080/02701367.2007.10599401 ↗
32. Efficacy of Aquatic Therapy in Improving Balance in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
33. Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: Is there a connection?10.1016/j.humov.2011.06.002 ↗