Evaluation of Sequential Hybrid Inversion in the MASW Method: A Case Study in Santa Fe, Granada, Spain
Source abstract
Abstract
The MASW (Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves) method oriented toward seismic microzoning has been evolving consistently and steadily for several decades, providing increasingly reliable solutions that are consistent with field and laboratory data typical of classical geotechnics. This study evaluates the improvement achieved when using a sequence of inversion algorithms on MASW test results: first with a global algorithm—specifically Differential Evolution (DE)—and subsequently, using the best model obtained from the global search, a second local algorithm—Trust Region Reflective (TRF). This second stage refines the previous model, further adjusting it to the borehole model used as the starting point of the sequence. The procedure has been automated using a Python script that incorporates two innovations compared to traditional inversion approaches. These consist of parameterising two variables: (i) an adaptive expansion factor for the Vs limits establisheda priori in the borehole model, and (ii) a subdivision into thinner layers for borehole models with excessively thick strata. This provides the algorithms with greater flexibility, particularly in scenarios with complex stratification. Additionally, to better define the deeper layers, the passive ESAC method in an “L-shape” configuration was also employed. The parameterised sequential hybrid inversion process was validated using synthetic data from two curves (Curve #1 and Curve #2), obtained by adding 5% Gaussian noise to the forward modelling results of the same initial synthetic model. The TRF refinement stage in the sequential hybrid inversion succeeded in reducing the error obtained by the global algorithm by percentages ranging from 59.7% to 5.8% across all conducted tests, confirming the stability of the methodology used.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Waves and Analysis · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Andalusian Institute of Geophysics and Prevention of Seismic Disasters, University of Granada, Avda. Severo Ochoa, s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain
Department of Physics and Chemistry, University of Almería, Carretera Sacramento, s/n, 04120 Almería, Spain
Department of Mining and Civil Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (Member of European University of Technology EUT+), P- Alfonso XIII, 52, 30203 Cartagena, Spain
Funding
Spanish Research Agency (AEI) from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MCIN) and FEDER
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Multichannel analysis of surface waves to map bedrock10.1190/1.1438226 ↗
2. Multichannel analysis of surface waves10.1190/1.1444590 ↗
3. Park, C.B., Miller, R.D., and Xia, J. (1997). Multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW)—A summary report of technical aspects, experimental results, and perspective. Kansas Geological Survey Open-File Report, Kansas Geological Survey. 97-10.
4. Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves10.1190/1.1444578 ↗
5. Foti, S., Lai, C., Rix, G.J., and Strobbia, C. (2014). Surface Wave Methods for Near-Surface Site Characterization, CRC Press.
6. Surface-wave inversion using a direct search algorithm and its application to ambient vibration measurements10.3997/1873-0604.2004018 ↗
7. Surface-wave method for near-surface characterisation: A tutorial10.3997/1873-0604.2004015 ↗
8. Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves, with special reference to microtremors
9. Ling, S., and Okada, H. (1993). An extended use of the spatial autocorrelation method for the estimation of geological structure using microtremors. Proceedings of the 89th SEGJ Conference, Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan.
10. Inversion of multi-channel surface wave data using a sequential hybrid approach10.1088/1742-2132/9/1/003 ↗
11. Rayleigh wave dispersion curve inversion via genetic algorithms and marginal posterior probability density estimation10.1016/j.jappgeo.2006.04.002 ↗
12. Differential evolution algorithm for nonlinear inversion of high-frequency Rayleigh wave dispersion curves10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.07.014 ↗
13. Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces10.1023/A:1008202821328 ↗
14. Aster, R.C., Borchers, B., and Thurber, C.H. (2018). Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-804651-7.00015-8 ↗
15. Luu, K. (2021). disba: A Python library for the computation of surface wave dispersion. GitHub Repos.
16. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
17. Dal Moro, G. (2015). Surface Wave Analysis for Near Surface Applications, Elsevier.
18. InterPACIFIC project: Comparison of invasive and non-invasive methods for seismic site characterization. Part II10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.009 ↗