AI-Assisted Creep Time Prediction Using Creep Strain Curves of AISI 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel: Effects of Data Transformation and Hyperparameter Optimisation
Source abstract
Abstract
High-temperature structural components are susceptible to creep deformation, which can ultimately lead to failure. In this work, an AI-based framework was developed capable of predicting the creep time of 316 austenitic stainless steel. Here, creep time refers to both the time to reach specific strain levels and the time to rupture. However, the scope of the present work is limited to rupture-time prediction, while the application of the framework to strain-level prediction will be reported in future work. The dataset consisted of creep strain curves from four heats, including both rupture and non-rupture curves. Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Gaussian Process Regressor (GPR), and Neural Network (NN) were employed. The effects of square-root and cube-root transformations on data distribution and model learning behaviour were analysed using model learning curves. An Optuna (version 4.3.0)-based hyperparameter tuning strategy was employed. The cube-root transformation improved the learning performance of SVR, GPR, and NN, whereas RF, GB, and XGB remained unaffected. Learning curves revealed mild overfitting for RF, GB, and XGB, and very minimal overfitting for SVR, GPR, and NN. NN achieved the best predictive performance (R2=0.92,RMSE=0.195, deviation factor of 1.57). The findings demonstrated that the combined useof creep strain curves, data transformation, learning curve guided model selection, and rigorous hyperparameter tuning can improve the prediction accuracy under a limited dataset.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy
Istituto Nazionale per l’Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavor, 00143 Rome, Italy
Funding
Istituto Nazionale per l’Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. A unified creep and fatigue life prediction approach for 316 austenitic stainless steel using machine and deep learning10.1111/ffe.14379 ↗
2. Machine Learning-Based Improved Creep Life Prediction of 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel with Add-on Chemical and Microstructural Features10.1007/s11665-025-11330-2 ↗
3. Effect of grain size on creep properties of type 316LN stainless steel10.1007/BF03026948 ↗
4. Machine learning assisted prediction of creep data of India specific reduced activation ferritic martensitic steel10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106165 ↗
5. Holdsworth, S. (2019). Creep-ductility of high temperature steels: A review. Metals, 9.10.3390/met9030342 ↗
6. Baraldi, D., Holmström, S., Nilsson, K.-F., Bruchhausen, M., and Simonovski, I. (2021). 316L(N) Creep Modeling with Phenomenological Approach and Artificial Intelligence Based Methods. Metals, 11.10.3390/met11050698 ↗
7. A Time-Temperature Relationship for Rupture and Creep Stresses
8. Manson, S.S., and Haferd, A.M. (1953). A Linear Time-Temperature Relation for Extrapolation of Creep and Stress-Rupture Data, NACA.
9. Orr, R.L., Sherby, J.E., and Dorn, O.D. (1953). Correlations of Rupture Data for Metals at Elevated Temperatures, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).10.2172/4425999 ↗
10. An Empirical Relationship Between Rupture Life and Minimum Creep Rate in Creep-Rupture Tests
11. Evans, R.W., and Wilshire, B. (1985). Creep of Metals and Alloys, The Institute of Metals.
12. Renewal creep theory10.1007/BF02649080 ↗
13. A deep learning-aided prediction approach for creep rupture time of Fe–Cr–Ni heat-resistant alloys by integrating textual and visual features10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.099 ↗
14. Creep rupture life predictions for Ni-based single crystal superalloys with automated machine learning10.1007/s12598-023-02559-8 ↗
15. Chai, M., He, Y., Li, Y., Song, Y., Zhang, Z., and Duan, Q. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Framework for Predicting Creep Rupture Life of Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13084972 ↗
16. Wei, L., Wang, S., Hao, W., Huang, J., Qu, N., Liu, Y., and Zhu, J. (2023). Prediction of High-Temperature Creep Life of Austenitic Heat-Resistant Steels Based on Data Fusion. Metals, 13.10.3390/met13091630 ↗
17. Physics-informed neural network for creep-fatigue life prediction of Inconel 617 and interpretation of influencing factors10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113267 ↗
18. Prediction of creep properties of Co–10Al–9W superalloys with machine learning10.1007/s10853-024-09507-6 ↗
19. Zhang, X., Yao, J., Wu, Y., Liu, X., Wang, C., and Liu, H. (2023). A Method for Predicting the Creep Rupture Life of Small-Sample Materials Based on Parametric Models and Machine Learning Models. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16206804 ↗
20. Creep Life Predictions by Machine Learning Methods for Ferritic Heat Resistant Steels10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2023-266 ↗
21. Machine learning approaches for creep rupture life prediction of metallic materials: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.ijpvp.2025.105690 ↗
22. Prediction of creep rupture life of ODS steels based on machine learning10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108117 ↗
23. Brownlee, J. (2020). Data Preprocessing with Machine Learning, Machine Learning Mastery.
24. Multi-objective optimization based on reduced order model for VHTR design10.1016/j.anucene.2026.112460 ↗
25. A digital twin guided physical-virtual denoising method for early fault detection of rolling element bearings10.1016/j.ymssp.2026.114108 ↗
26. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., and Koyama, M. (2019, January 4–8). Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. Proceedings of the KDD’19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
27. Factors influencing creep model equation selection10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.06.009 ↗
28. A machine-learning approach to predict creep properties of Cr–Mo steel with time-temperature parameters10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.079 ↗
29. Géron, A. (2019). Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras & TensorFlow, O’Reilly Media. [2nd ed.].
30. From creep-life prediction to ultra-creep-resistant steel design: An uncertainty-informed machine learning approach10.1016/j.actamat.2025.121073 ↗
31. Machine learning-based predictions and analyses of the creep rupture life of the Ni-based single crystal superalloy
32. Shekhar, S., Bansode, A., and Salim, A. (2021, January 8–10). A Comparative study of Hyper-Parameter Optimization Tools. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE), Brisbane, Australia.10.1109/CSDE53843.2021.9718485 ↗
33. Machine learning assisted interpretation of creep and fatigue life in titanium alloys10.1063/5.0129037 ↗
34. Mapping the creep life of nickel-based SX superalloys in a large compositional space by a two-model linkage machine learning method10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111229 ↗
35. Agrawal, T. (2021). Hyperparameter Optimization in Machine Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4842-6579-6 ↗
36. Bartz, E., Bartz-Beielstein, T., Zaefferer, M., and Mersmann, O. (2023). Hyperparameter Tuning for Machine and Deep Learning with R: A Practical Guide, Springer.10.1007/978-981-19-5170-1 ↗
37. Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms
38. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization
39. Normality Testing Methods and the Importance of Skewness and Kurtosis in Statistical Analysis10.54729/KTPE9512 ↗
40. Learning curves for decision making in supervised machine learning: A survey10.1007/s10994-024-06619-7 ↗
41. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C.K.I. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
42. Support vector regression machines
43. Augmentation of scarce data—A new approach for deep-learning modeling of composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110491 ↗
44. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2019). Deep Learning, The MIT Press. Available online: www.deeplearningbook.org.
45. Evaluation of Gaussian process regression kernel functions for improving groundwater prediction10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126960 ↗
46. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
47. A Survey of Decision Trees: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3416838 ↗
48. Automated Prediction of Good Dictionary EXamples (GDEX): A Comprehensive Experiment with Distant Supervision, Machine Learning, and Word Embedding-Based Deep Learning Techniques10.1155/2021/2553199 ↗
49. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
50. Baharvand, S., and Ahmari, H. (2024). Application of Machine Learning Approaches in Particle Tracking Model to Estimate Sediment Transport in Natural Streams, Springer.10.21203/rs.3.rs-3060825/v1 ↗
51. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’16), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
52. Kleynhans, T., Montanaro, M., Gerace, A., and Kanan, C. (2017). Predicting top-of-atmosphere thermal radiance using MERRA-2 atmospheric data with deep learning. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9111133 ↗
53. Gaussian Processes for Regression
54. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity10.1007/BF02478259 ↗
55. The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in the Brain10.1037/h0042519 ↗
56. Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
57. Bond strength prediction of concrete-encased steel structures using hybrid machine learning method10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.018 ↗