journal article·2026-06-23Open access

Quantifying Impact Damage Severity in Conventional, Hybrid and Natural-Based Composite Structures: An Acousto–Ultrasonics Approach

Kumar Shantanu Prasad, Gbanaibolou Jombo, Sikiru O. Ismail, Yong K. Chen, Hom Nath Dhakal

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 13

Abstract

This study presents an approach to quantifying impact-induced damage severity in composites, focusing on synthetic carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP), natural flax fibre-reinforced polymer (FFRP) and hybrid fibre reinforced polymer (HFRP) composite of carbon and flax. The investigation aims to quantitatively characterise impact damage under energies ranging from 10 to 70 J through acousto–ultrasonics (AU) testing, proposing an efficient technique for evaluating the integrity of various FRP composites under in-service conditions. AU testing was performed at azimuthal angles of 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°, utilising acousto–ultrasonic waveform indices (AUWIs), such as wave velocity, peak amplitude, energy content, centroid frequency and skewness factor. The damage severity index is correlated with the damage mode. The findings establish that wave velocity is a reliable parameter for quantifying damage severity across all composite material types considered, with high adjusted R2 values of 0.92 for CFRP, 0.89 for FFRP and 0.90 for HFRP. Peak amplitude also shows considerable sensitivity. Finally, this research highlights the limitations of traditional non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques and demonstrates the potential of combining multi-damage metrics with advanced imaging methods, such as X-ray micro-computed tomography (X-ray µCT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), to provide a comprehensive assessment of damage in various composite materials. The proposed methodology offers a promising approach for quantifying the impact damage severity in composite structures, as applicable to wind turbine blades, amongst other structural components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Engineering Research, School of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK

Portsmouth Centre for Advanced Materials and Manufacturing (PCAMM), School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK

Funding

University Alliance

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Vijayan, D.S., Sivasuriyan, A., Devarajan, P., Stefańska, A., Wodzyński, Ł., and Koda, E. (2023). Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composites in Civil Engineering Application—A Comprehensive Review. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13061509 ↗
2. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Machine-Induced Vibrations in Industrial Building Floors10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122627 ↗
3. Darmon, M. (2024). Special Issue on Ultrasonic Modeling for Non-Destructive Testing. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14052008 ↗
4. Robust Quantitative X-Ray Phase Diagnostic for Carbon Composite Characterisation in the Context of Lightning Induced Risk10.1038/s41598-024-72087-7 ↗
5. A Review of Applications of CT Imaging on Fiber Reinforced Composites10.1177/00219983211050705 ↗
6. X-Ray Computed Tomography of Polymer Composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.023 ↗
7. Azad, M.M., Shah, A.U.R., Prabhakar, M.N., and Kim, H.S. (2024). Deep Learning-Based Microscopic Damage Assessment of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17215265 ↗
8. Vary, A. (1988). The Acousto-Ultrasonic Approach. Acousto-Ultrasonics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-1965-9_1 ↗
9. An Ultrasonic-Acoustic Technique for Nondestructive Evaluation of Fiber Composite Quality10.1002/pen.760190509 ↗
10. Quantitative Damage Detection in Cross-Ply Laminates Using Lamb Wave Method10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00163-5 ↗
11. Lamb Wave Method for Quick Inspection of Impact-Induced Delamination in Composite Laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.011 ↗
12. Guided Lamb Waves for Identification of Damage in Composite Structures: A Review10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020 ↗
13. Health Monitoring of Carbon/Carbon, Woven Reinforced Composites: Damage Assessment by Using Advanced Signal Processing Techniques. Part II: Acousto–Ultrasonics Monitoring of Damage Development10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.042 ↗
14. Damage Characterization of Composite Plates under Low Velocity Impact Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.042 ↗
15. Guided Wave Scattering at a Delamination in a Quasi-Isotropic Composite Laminate: Experiment and Simulation10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114406 ↗
16. Mechanical Behaviour of Glass and Carbon Fibre Reinforced Composites at Varying Strain Rates and Temperatures10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.120 ↗
17. Correlation of Fiber Composite Tensile Strength with the Ultrasonic Stress Wave Factor10.1520/JTE11379J ↗
18. (2022). Standard Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials and Their Laminates (Standard No. ASTM D2344/D2344M-22).
19. Guided Waves for Structural Health Monitoring in Composites: A Review and Implementation Strategies10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100790 ↗
20. Tanveer, M., Elahi, M.U., Jung, J., Azad, M.M., Khalid, S., and Kim, H.S. (2024). Recent Advancements in Guided Ultrasonic Waves for Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Structures. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142311091 ↗
21. Modeling of a Realistic Barely Visible Impact Damage in Composite Structures Based on NDT Techniques and Numerical Simulations10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113889 ↗
22. Barely Visible Impact Damage Detection in Composite Structures Using Deep Learning Networks with Varying Complexities10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110907 ↗
23. Anisotropy Influence on Guided Wave Scattering for Composite Structure Monitoring10.1177/14759217221133284 ↗
24. Azad, M.M., Munyaneza, O., Jung, J., Sohn, J.W., Han, J.W., and Kim, H.S. (2024). Damage Localization and Severity Assessment in Composite Structures Using Deep Learning Based on Lamb Waves. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24248057 ↗
25. Andersen, K.G., Jombo, G., Ismail, S.O., Chen, Y.K., Dhakal, N., Zhang, Y., Andersen, K.G., Jombo, G., Ismail, S.O., and Chen, Y.K. (2021). Damage Characterisation in Composite Laminates Using Vibro-Acoustic Technique. Energy and Sustainable Futures: Proceedings of 2nd ICESF 2020, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-63916-7_34 ↗
26. Kiernan, M.T. (1989). A Physical Model for the Acousto-Ultrasonic Method, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
27. and Duke, P.C. (2022, July 20). Analysis of an Acousto-Ultrasonic Signal|Semantic Scholar. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/PC-analysis-of-an-acousto-ultrasonic-signal-Kiernan-Duke/77a349f8e0a823ef45cf747e89c961e583ddf223.
28. Acousto-Ultrasonics Approach
29. Talreja, R. (1987). Fatigue of Composite Materials, Technomic Publishing.
30. Draper, N.R., and Smith, H. (2014). Applied Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons.
31. Montgomery, D.C., Peck, E.A., and Vining, G.G. (2012). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, Wiley. [5th ed.]. Available online: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2191029.
32. A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 ↗
33. Estimating the Dimension of a Model10.1214/aos/1176344136 ↗
34. Numerical Analysis on the Interaction of Guided Lamb Waves with a Local Elastic Stiffness Reduction in Quasi-Isotropic Composite Plate Structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.025 ↗
35. Low-Velocity Impact Response of Non-Woven Hemp Fibre Reinforced Unsaturated Polyester Composites: Influence of Impactor Geometry and Impact Velocity10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.004 ↗
36. Fiber Contribution to Modal Damping of Polymer Matrix Composite Panels10.2514/3.26691 ↗
37. Numerical and Experimental Characterization of the Dynamic Properties of Flax Fiber Reinforced Composites10.1142/S175882511650068X ↗