Is AI Catching Up to Human Expression? Exploring Emotion, Personality, Authorship, and Linguistic Style in English and Arabic with Six Large Language Models
Source abstract
Abstract
The advancing fluency of large language models (LLMs) raises important questions about their ability to emulate complex human traits, including emotional expression and personality, across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. This study investigates whether state-of-the-art LLMs can convincingly mimic emotional nuance in English and personality markers in Arabic, a critical under-resourced language with unique linguistic and cultural characteristics. We conduct two tasks across six models: Jais, Mistral, LLaMA, GPT-4o, Gemini, and DeepSeek. First, we evaluate whether machine classifiers can reliably distinguish between human-authored and AI-generated texts. Second, we assess the extent to which LLM-generated texts exhibit emotional or personality traits comparable to those of humans. Our results demonstrate that AI-generated texts are distinguishable from human-authored ones (F1 > 0.95), though classification performance deteriorates on paraphrased samples, indicating reliance on superficial stylistic cues. Emotion and personality classification experiments reveal significant generalization gaps: classifiers trained on human data perform poorly on AI-generated texts and vice versa, suggesting LLMs encode affective signals differently from humans. Importantly, augmenting training with AI-generated data enhances performance in the Arabic personality classification task, highlighting the potential of synthetic data to address challenges in under-resourced languages. Model-specific analyses show that GPT-4o and Gemini exhibit superior affective coherence, while LLaMA performs worse. Linguistic and psycholinguistic analyses reveal measurable divergences in tone, authenticity, and textual complexity between human and AI texts. These findings have significant implications for affective computing, authorship attribution, and responsible AI deployment, particularly within under-resourced language contexts where generative AI detection and alignment pose unique challenges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Authorship Attribution and Profiling · Mental Health via Writing · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11574, Saudi Arabia
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Large language models: A comprehensive survey of its applications, challenges, limitations, and prospects
2. Pearson, J. (2026, June 15). Integration of Large Language Models in Marketing and Business Processes. Available online: https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/865770.
3. Krook, J., Schneiders, E., Seabrooke, T., Leesakul, N., and Clos, J. (2026, June 15). Large Language Models (LLMs) for Legal Advice: A Scoping Review. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4976189.
4. Comparative Efficacy of AI LLMs in Clinical Social Work: ChatGPT-4, Gemini, Copilot10.1177/10497315241313071 ↗
5. Large Language Models as AI-Powered Educational Assistants: Comparing GPT-4 and Gemini for Writing Teaching Cases
6. Exploring dimensions of human likeness in conversational AI: Implications for human identity threat and dehumanization10.1177/10711813251358801 ↗
7. Alsadhan, N., and Skillicorn, D. (2020, January 17–20). Sentiment is an Attitude not a Feeling. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), Sorrento, Italy.10.1109/ICDMW51313.2020.00010 ↗
8. Paech, S.J. (2023). EQ-Bench: An emotional intelligence benchmark for large language models. arXiv.
9. Abbasian, M., Azimi, I., Feli, M., Rahmani, A.M., and Jain, R. (2024). Empathy through multimodality in conversational interfaces. arXiv.
10. Roy, B.N., Maity, S., Singh, K.R., Chowdhury, P., Das, A., and Saha, D. (2024, January 23–25). ECGText: Crafting Emotional Texts through GenAI. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Emerging Communication Technologies (ICEC), Guntur, India.10.1109/ICEC59683.2024.10837153 ↗
11. Advancing sentiment analysis through emotionally-agnostic text mining in large language models
12. Gallifant, J., Fiske, A., Strekalova, Y.A.L., Osorio-Valencia, J.S., Parke, R., Mwavu, R., Martinez, N., Gichoya, J.W., Ghassemi, M., and Demner-Fushman, D. (2024). Peer review of GPT-4 technical report and systems card. PLoS Digit. Health, 3.10.1371/journal.pdig.0000417 ↗
13. Team, G., Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., Alayrac, J.B., Yu, J., Soricut, R., Schalkwyk, J., Dai, A.M., Hauth, A., and Millican, K. (2023). Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv.
14. Jiang, A.Q., Sablayrolles, A., Mensch, A., Bamford, C., Chaplot, D.S., de las Casas, D., Hanna, E.B., Bressand, F., Lengyel, G., and Bour, G. (2023). Mistral 7B. arXiv.
15. Sengupta, N., Sahu, S.K., Jia, B., Katipomu, S., Li, H., Koto, F., Marshall, W., Gosal, G., Liu, C., and Chen, Z. (2023). Jais and Jais-chat: Arabic-centric foundation and instruction-tuned open generative large language models. arXiv.
16. Grattafiori, A., Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., and Vaughan, A. (2024). The LLaMA 3 herd of models. arXiv.
17. Liu, A., Feng, B., Xue, B., Wang, B., Wu, B., Lu, C., Zhao, C., Deng, C., Zhang, C., and Ruan, C. (2024). DeepSeek-V3 technical report. arXiv.
18. Alshammari, H., El-Sayed, A., and Elleithy, K. (2024). AI-generated text detector for arabic language using encoder-based transformer architecture. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 8.10.3390/bdcc8030032 ↗
19. Ensemble learning approach for distinguishing human and computer-generated Arabic reviews10.7717/peerj-cs.2345 ↗
20. A Novel Dialect-Aware Framework for the Classification of Arabic Dialects and Emotions10.3844/jcssp.2025.88.95 ↗
21. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2001)
22. Beyond the surface: Stylometric analysis of GPT-4o’s capacity for literary style imitation
23. Dubey, A. (2024). Capturing Style Through Large Language Models—An Authorship Perspective. [Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University].
24. Opara, C. (2024). StyloAI: Distinguishing AI-generated content with stylometric analysis. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-64312-5_13 ↗
25. Lee, S., Lim, S., Han, S., Oh, G., Chae, H., Chung, J., Kim, M., Kwak, B.-W., Lee, Y., and Lee, D. (2025). Do llms have distinct and consistent personality? Trait: Personality testset designed for llms with psychometrics. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.469 ↗
26. Li, Z., Li, S., Zhu, D., Ma, Q., and Xiong, W. (2025). Eerpd: Leveraging emotion and emotion regulation for improving personality detection. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. Authorship attribution in the era of LLMs: Problems, methodologies, and challenges10.1145/3715073.3715076 ↗
28. Personality analysis for social media users using Arabic language and its effect on sentiment analysis10.1007/s13278-025-01413-2 ↗
29. Personality analysis of students’ writing in social media-based learning environments10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3491934 ↗
30. How do arab tweeters perceive the COVID-19 pandemic?10.1007/s10936-020-09715-6 ↗
31. Evaluating Arabic Emotion Recognition Task Using ChatGPT Models10.3390/jtaer19020058 ↗
32. Stylometry recognizes human and LLM-generated texts in short samples10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129001 ↗
33. Evaluating the efficacy of LLMs to emulate realistic human personalities
34. Enhancing empathic reasoning of large language models based on psychotherapy models for AI-assisted social support10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e23 ↗
35. The role of humanization and robustness of LLMs in conversational AI for individuals with depression10.2196/56569 ↗
36. Huang, B., Chen, C., and Shu, K. (2024). Can large language models identify authorship?. Findings of the Association for computational linguistics: EMNLP 2024, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.26 ↗
37. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Association for Computational Linguistics.
38. Antoun, W., Baly, F., and Hajj, H. (2020). AraBERT: Transformer-based Model for Arabic Language Understanding. Proceedings of the Workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora, European Language Resources Association.
39. Wallace, B.C., Kertz, L., and Charniak, E. (2014). Humans Require Context to Infer Ironic Intent, ACL.10.3115/v1/P14-2084 ↗
40. Tanyel, T. (2022). Dataset for NLP, Kaggle.
41. Cheela, S. (2023). Text Emotion Recognition Dataset, Kaggle.
42. Elgiriyewithana, N. (2024). Emotions Dataset, Kaggle.
43. MSAPersonality: A modern standard Arabic dataset for personality recognition10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4498-4507 ↗
44. The Big Five personality factors and personal values10.1177/0146167202289008 ↗
45. QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing
46. A new readability yardstick10.1037/h0057532 ↗
47. Gunning, R. (1952). The Technique of Clear Writing, McGraw-Hill.
48. Smith, E.A., and Senter, R.J. (1967). Automated Readability Index, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories, Aerospace Medical Division, Air Force Systems Command.
49. A formula for predicting readability
50. Alyammi, S. (2025). Empathy-Driven Arabic Conversational Chatbot Using Pre-Trained Transformer Model. [Master’s Thesis, King Saud University].