journal article·2026-06-23Open access

Redundancy-Aware Analysis of Functional Complementarity in Seismic Attributes for Deep Facies Segmentation

Roberto Carlos Moreno-Hernández, Juan A. Moreno-Hernández, Margarita De la Portilla-Reynoso, Claudia del C. Gutiérrez-Torres, Juan G. Barbosa-Saldaña, Didier Samayoa, José A. Jiménez-Bernal

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 13

Abstract

Seismic attribute selection remains a critical yet often heuristic component in deep learning-based segmentation workflows. In this work, we propose a redundancy-aware framework to systematically analyse the contribution of seismic attributes by combining input-space statistics, representational similarity (CKA), and error-based evaluation. Our results suggest that statistical redundancy in the input space does not directly translate to functional redundancy within the network. In particular, attributes such as amplitude and instantaneous phase may exhibit high similarity in the input space while producing distinct error patterns and meaningful performance gains. We further observe that complementary attributes do not necessarily yield additive improvements. While some combinations introduce conflicting interactions that limit global performance, others provide stable and consistent improvements across classes. Notably, the combination of amplitude, phase, and local variance forms a minimal informative subset that improves segmentation performance in a balanced manner, particularly in challenging facies. These findings suggest that attribute selection should be guided by functional complementarity and interaction stability rather than by input diversity alone. The proposed framework provides a principled approach for identifying effective attribute subsets, contributing to more efficient and interpretable seismic segmentation workflows.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Seismic Waves and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

División de Geociencias Aplicadas, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica A.C., San Luis Potosí 78216, Mexico

Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico

Escuela Superior en Economía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11350, Mexico

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. What makes an expert effective at interpreting seismic images?10.1130/G32375.1 ↗
2. Uncertainty in structural interpretation: Lessons to be learnt10.1016/j.jsg.2015.03.003 ↗
3. Increasing the quality of seismic interpretation10.1190/INT-2015-0218.1 ↗
4. Payton, C.E. (1977). Application of amplitude, frequency, and other attributes to stratigraphic and hydrocarbon determination. Seismic Stratigraphy—Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration, American Association of Petroleum Geologists. AAPG Memoir 26.10.1306/M26490 ↗
5. Chopra, S., and Marfurt, K.J. (2007). Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification and Reservoir Characterization, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers.10.1190/1.9781560801900 ↗
6. Barnes, A.E. (2016). Handbook of Poststack Seismic Attributes, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.9781560803324 ↗
7. Machine learning for subsurface geological feature identification from seismic data: Methods, datasets, challenges, and opportunities10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104887 ↗
8. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
9. Alaudah, Y., Michalowicz, P.J., Alfarraj, M., and AlRegib, G. (2019). A multidimensional convolutional neural network for automatic facies identification from seismic data. arXiv.
10. Silva, R.M., Baroni, L., Ferreira, R.S., Civitarese, D., Szwarcman, D., and Brazil, E.V. (2019). Netherlands dataset: A new public dataset for machine learning in seismic interpretation. arXiv.
11. Seismic facies analysis using machine learning10.1190/geo2017-0595.1 ↗
12. Seismic attribute selection for machine-learning-based facies analysis10.1190/geo2019-0223.1 ↗
13. Literature review on deep learning for the segmentation of seismic images10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104955 ↗
14. ADDCNN: An attention-based deep dilated convolutional neural network for seismic facies analysis with interpretable spatial–spectral maps10.1109/TGRS.2020.2999365 ↗
15. An improved deep dilated convolutional neural network for seismic facies interpretation10.1016/j.petsci.2023.11.027 ↗
16. Automated seismic semantic segmentation using attention U-Net10.1190/geo2023-0149.1 ↗
17. Enhancing machine learning-based seismic facies classification through attribute selection: Application to 3D seismic data from the Malay and Sabah Basins, offshore Malaysia10.1007/s40948-024-00846-x ↗
18. Quantifying the sensitivity of seismic facies classification to seismic attribute selection: An explainable machine-learning study10.1190/INT-2021-0173.1 ↗
19. Attribute selection in seismic facies classification: Application to a Gulf of Mexico 3D seismic survey and the Barnett Shale10.1190/INT-2018-0246.1 ↗
20. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
21. Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. I. Fundamentals10.1109/5.135376 ↗
22. Estimating mutual information
23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2nd ed.].
24. Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., Lee, H., and Hinton, G. (2019). Similarity of neural network representations revisited. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), PMLR. Available online: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/kornblith19a.html.
25. SVCCA: Singular vector canonical correlation analysis for deep learning dynamics and interpretability