journal article·2026-06-19Open access

Knowledge Graph-Driven Graph Neural Networks for Equipment Fault Prediction in Maglev Train Systems

Chunlong Yu, Yi Peng, Kunyan Li, Jianyu Guo, Yi Wang, JingJing Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 12

Abstract

Equipment fault prediction in maglev train systems poses substantial challenges: fault events are inherently rare, class distributions are severely imbalanced, and individual equipment units are subject to complex spatial and functional couplings that single-device statistical approaches fundamentally cannot capture. To address these challenges, this study proposes a Knowledge Graph-driven Graph Neural Network (KG-GNN) framework. A fault knowledge graph encompassing equipment, fault, temporal, and environmental entities is constructed to unify multi-source maintenance data. Graph connectivity is established via three spatial relation types (co-location, co-zone, and co-level), with edge weights derived from Laplacian-smoothed Lift scores quantifying fault co-occurrence strength. A two-layer GATv2Conv-based graph attention network is designed: the first layer employs four-head attention with explicit edge-weight integration to capture heterogeneous neighborhood influences, while the second layer produces compact node embeddings via single-head attention. A Top-20 sparsification strategy suppresses weak-association noise, and training under severe class imbalance is stabilized through Focal Loss and F2-Score-guided early stopping. On the test set, the proposed method achieves an F2-Score of 0.5703, Recall of 0.6825, and AUC-ROC of 0.9329 (single-run evaluation); multi-seed evaluation (5 seeds) yields F2 = 0.5645 ± 0.0035, Recall = 0.6789 ± 0.0095, and AUC-ROC = 0.9298 ± 0.0026, outperforming the MLP baseline by 18.3% in F2-Score and substantially exceeding GCN (F2 = 0.1476 ± 0.0176) and GATConv (F2 = 0.4284 ± 0.0097). Ablation studies confirm the individual contributions of authentic graph topology, precise edge weighting, and graph sparsification to overall performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency · Railway Engineering and Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shanghai Shentong Metro Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201103, China

College of Urban Transportation and Logistics, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China

Funding

the National 14th Five-Year Science Key Research and Development Program of China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Applications of Machine Learning to Machine Fault Diagnosis: A Review and Roadmap10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587 ↗
2. Spatio-Temporal Fusion Attention: A Novel Approach for Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on Graph Neural Network10.1109/TIM.2022.3184352 ↗
3. Review on Graph Neural Networks for Process Soft Sensor Development, Fault Diagnosis, and Process Monitoring10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00283 ↗
4. Multi-Connected Temporal Encoding Graph Neural Network for Complex Industrial Fault Diagnosis
5. Lian, P., Zhang, J., Song, J., Zou, J., and Fan, S. (2025, January 10). Knowledge Graph-Driven Graph Neural Network with Multi-Source Knowledge for Industrial Fault Diagnosis. Proceedings of the 2025 Global Reliability and Prognostics and Health Management Conference (PHM-Xian), Xi’an, China.10.1109/PHM-Xian66756.2025.11427706 ↗
6. Anomaly Detection via Semantically Conjugate View Learning on Industrial Temporal Data10.1109/JIOT.2025.3527694 ↗
7. Zhou, A., Xu, X., Raghunathan, R., Lal, A., Guan, X., Yu, B., and Li, B. (2024, January 14–18). KnowGraph: Knowledge-Enabled Anomaly Detection via Logical Reasoning on Graph Data. Proceedings of the 2024 on ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1145/3658644.3690354 ↗
8. Temporal Knowledge Graph Informer Network for Remaining Useful Life Prediction
9. Davari, N., Veloso, B., Costa, G.D.A., Pereira, P.M., Ribeiro, R.P., and Gama, J. (2021). A Survey on Data-Driven Predictive Maintenance for the Railway Industry. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21175739 ↗
10. Qiu, S., Cui, X., Ping, Z., Shan, N., Li, Z., Bao, X., and Xu, X. (2023). Deep Learning Techniques in Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Industrial Systems: A Review. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23031305 ↗
11. LSTM-Based Failure Prediction for Railway Rolling Stock Equipment10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119767 ↗
12. An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Railway Predictive Maintenance Using Data Streams from the Metro Operator of Portugal10.1038/s41598-025-08084-1 ↗
13. Xiong, J., Sun, Y., Sun, J., Wan, Y., and Yu, G. (2024). Sparse Temporal Data-Driven SSA-CNN-LSTM-Based Fault Prediction of Electromechanical Equipment in Rail Transit Stations. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14188156 ↗
14. A Rare Failure Detection Model for Aircraft Predictive Maintenance Using a Deep Hybrid Learning Approach10.1007/s00521-022-07167-8 ↗
15. Liu, D., Wu, D., Xu, J., Li, Y., Gul, M.Z., and Ni, F. (2025). Machine Learning in Maglev Transportation Systems: Review and Prospects. Actuators, 14.10.3390/act14120576 ↗
16. The Emerging Graph Neural Networks for Intelligent Fault Diagnostics and Prognostics: A Guideline and a Benchmark Study10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108653 ↗
17. Improved Fault Detection and Diagnosis Using Graph Auto Encoder and Attention-Based Graph Convolution Networks10.1016/j.dche.2024.100158 ↗
18. Causal Intervention Graph Neural Network for Fault Diagnosis of Complex Industrial Processes10.1016/j.ress.2024.110328 ↗
19. A Graph Convolutional Network for Optimal Intelligent Predictive Maintenance of Railway Tracks10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100542 ↗
20. Wu, Y., Su, J., Zhang, S., and Li, Z. (2025, January 9). Explainable Dynamic Graph Neural Networks for Predictive Maintenance in Vehicle Chassis Systems. Proceedings of the 17th Asian Conference on Machine Learning, Taipei, China. Available online: https://openreview.net/forum?id=dlSeVW1LLt.
21. Yao, J., Bai, W., Yang, G., Meng, Z., and Su, K. (2022). Assessment and Prediction of Railway Station Equipment Health Status Based on Graph Neural Network. Front. Phys., 10.10.3389/fphy.2022.1080972 ↗
22. Duan, H., Chen, G., Yu, Y., Du, C., Bao, Z., and Ma, D. (2025). DyGAT-FTNet: A Dynamic Graph Attention Network for Multi-Sensor Fault Diagnosis and Time–Frequency Data Fusion. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25030810 ↗
23. Explainable Neural Network Meets Graph Neural Network: Recent Advances in Process Fault Detection and Diagnosis10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109528 ↗
24. Lu, W., Wang, W., Qin, X., and Cai, Z. (2024). Enhancing Fault Diagnosis in Mechanical Systems with Graph Neural Networks Addressing Class Imbalance. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12132064 ↗
25. Xie, X., Wang, J., Han, Y., and Li, W. (2024). Knowledge Graph-Based In-Context Learning for Advanced Fault Diagnosis in Sensor Networks. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24248086 ↗
26. Time-Aware Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Machinery Fault Prediction10.1016/j.cie.2025.111582 ↗
27. Enhancing Temporal Knowledge Graph for Future Event Prediction with Long-Term Dense Graph10.26599/TST.2024.9010119 ↗
28. Brody, S., Alon, U., and Yahav, E. (2021). How Attentive Are Graph Attention Networks?. arXiv.
29. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Elevator Door Systems Using Variational Mode Decomposition and Multi-Scale Convolutional Networks10.1007/s40430-025-05816-2 ↗