A Cloud-Native Blockchain-Integrated Architecture for Digital Credential Management in Learning Management Systems: Empirical Performance Evaluation and Deployment Trade-Offs
Source abstract
Abstract
Trustworthy digital credential management is increasingly important in LMS-connected higher-education information systems, yet institutions still lack controlled implementation-oriented evidence on how cloud-native service decomposition and blockchain-backed trust services influence deployment performance. This study develops and evaluates a cloud-native architecture that combines containerized microservices with Hyperledger Fabric-based permissioned ledger services and a Polygon-linked public-chain anchoring path for credential issuance, learning-record verification, and record validation. Unlike largely conceptual prior work, it benchmarks four functionally aligned deployment paths in a unified Kubernetes-managed testbed: a monolithic baseline, a microservices-only baseline, a Hyperledger Fabric-integrated variant, and a Polygon-linked anchoring path. The credential-service paths were evaluated under stepped workloads from 1000 to 20,000 scheduled virtual users. Evaluation focused on service-path latency, throughput, tamper-detection accuracy, and resource utilization. The microservices-only architecture achieved the lowest baseline latency (182 ms), Hyperledger Fabric maintained stable response times for trusted institutional workflows (352 ms at baseline and 485 ms at 20,000 virtual users), and the Polygon-linked anchoring path reached the highest observed service-path throughput (228 TPS) in the tested prototype. Both blockchain-integrated variants detected tampered credentials in all successfully processed tamper cases. Overall, the results show that cloud-native decomposition and ledger-backed trust and anchoring can support scalable and trustworthy credential services when platform choice aligns with institutional governance scope, verification audience, and deployment constraints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cloud Computing and Resource Management · Software System Performance and Reliability · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Cyber Security, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Malaysia
School of Artificial Intelligence, Dongguan City University, Dongguan 523419, China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Cloud-native applications10.1109/MCC.2017.4250939 ↗
2. A sketch of migrating learning management systems towards microservice architecture
3. Microservices architecture enables DevOps: Migration to a cloud-native architecture10.1109/MS.2016.64 ↗
4. Blockchain-driven decentralized identity management: An interdisciplinary review and research agenda10.1016/j.im.2024.104026 ↗
5. Grech, A., and Camilleri, A.F. (2017). Blockchain in Education. Joint Research Centre Technical Report, European Commission.
6. Alammary, A.S. (2025). Building a sustainable digital infrastructure for higher education: A blockchain-based solution for cross-institutional enrollment. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17010194 ↗
7. Alammary, A., Alhazmi, S., Almasri, M., and Gillani, S. (2019). Blockchain-based applications in education: A systematic review. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9122400 ↗
8. EduCTX: A blockchain-based higher education credit platform10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2789929 ↗
9. Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De Caro, A., Enyeart, D., Ferris, C., Laventman, G., and Manevich, Y. (2018, January 23–26). Hyperledger Fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. Proceedings of the 13th EuroSys Conference, Porto, Portugal.10.1145/3190508.3190538 ↗
10. Polygon Labs (2026, May 08). Polygon PoS Overview. Available online: https://docs.polygon.technology/pos/overview.
11. Blockchain-based micro-credentialing system in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110238 ↗
12. Silaghi, D.L., and Popescu, D.E. (2025). A systematic review of blockchain-based initiatives in comparison to best practices used in higher education institutions. Computers, 14.10.3390/computers14040141 ↗
13. W3C (2026, May 08). Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0. W3C Recommendation, 19 July 2022. Available online: https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/.
14. W3C (2026, May 08). Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0. W3C Recommendation, 15 May 2025. Available online: https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/.
15. MedBlock: Efficient and secure medical data sharing via blockchain10.1007/s10916-018-0993-7 ↗
16. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006 ↗
17. Tonelli, R., Lunesu, M.I., Pinna, A., Taibi, D., and Marchesi, M. (2019, January 24). Implementing a microservices system with blockchain smart contracts. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE), Hangzhou, China.10.1109/IWBOSE.2019.8666520 ↗
18. Schuhknecht, F.M., Sharma, A., Dittrich, J., and Agrawal, D. (2019). ChainifyDB: How to blockchainify any data management system. arXiv.
19. Hybrid blockchain database systems: Design and performance10.14778/3510397.3510406 ↗
20. Blockchain-based identity management systems: A review10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102731 ↗
21. Xu, X., Weber, I., and Staples, M. (2019). Architecture for Blockchain Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-03035-3 ↗
22. Kontzinos, C., Karakolis, E., Kokkinakos, P., Skalidakis, S., Askounis, D., and Psarras, J. (2024). Application and evaluation of a blockchain-centric platform for smart badge accreditation in higher education institutions. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14125191 ↗
23. Chan, W., Gai, K., Yu, J., and Zhu, L. (2025). Blockchain-assisted self-sovereign identities on education: A survey. Blockchains, 3.10.3390/blockchains3010003 ↗
24. Bochnia, R., and Anke, J. (August, January 30). Long-lived verifiable credentials: Ensuring durability beyond the issuer’s lifetime. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2024), Vienna, Austria.10.1145/3664476.3669933 ↗
25. Gomez Vieites, A., Delgado-von-Eitzen, C., and Estevez Garcia, D. (2025). GDPR-compliant academic certification via blockchain: Legal and technical validation of the GAVIN Project. Appl. Sci., 15.10.20944/preprints202507.0926.v1 ↗
26. Hsieh, Y.-H., Yan, J.-Y., Liao, C.-H., and Yuan, S.-M. (2024). Self-sovereign identity-based e-portfolio ecosystem. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210361 ↗
27. Amazon Web Services (2026, May 08). Amazon EC2 On-Demand Pricing. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/on-demand/.
28. Amazon Web Services (2026, May 08). Amazon EKS Pricing. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/eks/pricing/.
29. Polygon Labs (2026, May 08). Estimate Gas Fees—Polygon Gas Station. Available online: https://docs.polygon.technology/tools/gas/polygon-gas-station.