journal article·2026-06-17Open access

Multi-Organ Anatomical Context Improves Ureter Segmentation in Arterial-Phase CT: A Systematic Evaluation of nnU-Net Configurations

Matthew Choi, Sangpil Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 12

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of the ureter on abdominal computed tomography (CT) remains challenging due to its thin tubular structure and limited expert-annotated training data. While recent deep learning approaches have shown promise on non-contrast CT, arterial-phase imaging remains under-researched. We systematically compared nnU-Net-based configurations for ureter segmentation on arterial-phase CT using 25 radiologist-annotated cases from Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. Seven training strategies were evaluated with five-fold cross-validation: binary ureter-only segmentation, multi-organ training with anatomical context from eight structures, alternative encoder architectures (ResEncM), specialized loss functions (Tversky, clDice), and a multi-phase fusion architecture. Multi-organ training with Tversky-Focal loss (Config 6) achieved the highest mean Dice of 0.743 ± 0.021 with the best clDice connectivity score (0.800 ± 0.046) and lowest fragmentation (6.56 connected components). Multi-phase fusion yielded a mean Dice of 0.713 on the 12-case subset; a controlled arterial-phase single-channel ablation on the identical 12-case subset achieved 0.721, marginally exceeding the two-channel fusion result (0.713). These findings are scoped to a single-institution exploratory cohort and should be interpreted as internally comparative benchmarking results; they may not generalize to other centres, scanners, or patient populations, and do not constitute clinical validation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments · Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies · Renal and Vascular Pathologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Artificial Intelligence, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of SMEs and Startups

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. State-of-the-art CT urography10.1148/rg.242035104 ↗
2. Quantitative assessment of renal obstruction in multi-phase CTU using automatic 3D segmentation of the renal parenchyma and renal pelvis: A proof of concept
3. Imaging and staging of transitional cell carcinoma: Part 1, lower urinary tract10.2214/AJR.08.1318 ↗
4. Measurement of ureteral length: Comparison of deep learning-based method and other estimation methods on CT and KUB10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109374 ↗
5. Kidney, ureter, and urinary bladder segmentation based on non-contrast enhanced computed tomography images using modified U-Net10.1038/s41598-024-66045-6 ↗
6. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Munich, Germany, 5–9 October 2015, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
7. Segmentation of multiple organs in non-contrast 3D abdominal CT images10.1007/s11548-007-0135-z ↗
8. nnU-Net: A self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z ↗
9. Ulrich, C., Isensee, F., Wald, T., Zenk, M., Baumgartner, M., and Maier-Hein, K.H. (2023). MultiTalent: A multi-dataset approach to medical image segmentation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–12 October 2023, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-43898-1_62 ↗
10. The Medical Segmentation Decathlon10.1038/s41467-022-30695-9 ↗
11. Heller, N., Sathianathen, N., Kalapara, A., Walczak, E., Moore, K., Kaluzniak, H., Freymann, J., Ball, J., McSweeney, S., and Fowler, J. (2019). The KiTS19 challenge data: 300 kidney tumor cases with clinical context, CT semantic segmentations, and surgical outcomes. arXiv.
12. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
13. Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networks
14. Shit, S., Paetzold, J.C., Sekuboyina, A., Ezhov, I., Unger, A., Zhylka, A., Pluim, J.P.W., Bauer, U., and Menze, B.H. (2021, January 20–25). clDice—A novel topology-preserving loss function for tubular structure segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01629 ↗
15. Topology-Preserving Deep Image Segmentation
16. Dental panoramic X-ray image segmentation for multi-feature coordinate position learning10.1177/20552076241277154 ↗
17. Feature-guided multilayer encoding–decoding network for segmentation for 3D intraoral scan data10.1038/s41598-025-16360-3 ↗
18. TotalSegmentator: Robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in CT images10.1148/ryai.230024 ↗
19. Isensee, F., Wald, T., Ulrich, C., Baumgartner, M., Roy, S., Maier-Hein, K., and Jaeger, P.F. (2024). nnU-Net revisited: A call for rigorous validation in 3D medical image segmentation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Marrakesh, Morocco, 6–10 October 2024, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-72114-4_47 ↗
20. Abraham, N., and Khan, N.M. (2019, January 8–11). A novel focal Tversky loss function with improved Attention U-Net for lesion segmentation. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759329 ↗
21. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 ↗
22. Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Automated Abdominal Organ Segmentation—Performance of TotalSegmentator Compared to Human Readers and an Independent nnU-Net Model10.1007/s10278-024-01265-w ↗
23. Lowekamp, B.C., Chen, D.T., Ibáñez, L., and Blezek, D. (2013). The design of SimpleITK. Front. Neuroinform., 7.10.3389/fninf.2013.00045 ↗