journal article·2026-06-17Open access

Optimized Quantum Classifiers for the Prevention of Anxiety Disorders Using Wearable Data

Spyridon Papamentzelopoulos, Sotirios Nikoletseas

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 12

Abstract

Quantum machine learning (QML) provides a framework for benchmarking wearable biosignal classification relevant to stress detection. Motivated by the burden of stress-related conditions, this study compares three quantum classifiers with seven classical baselines using heart rate and respiration rate features as inputs under noise-free and noisy conditions. Uncertainty was quantified using Nadeau–Bengio-corrected confidence intervals and percentile bootstrap (B=1000). The variational quantum classifier (VQC) achieved an accuracy of 99.47%/97.30% (noise-free/noisy), the quantum support vector classifier (QSVC) achieved 99.90%/99.37%, and PegasosQSVC achieved 99.80%/99.70%. Additionally, under the assessed proof-of-concept conditions, statistical equivalence between the QSVC and the best-performing classical model was established at Δ=1 pp; PegasosQSVC under noise achieved equivalence at Δ=2 pp with accuracy degradation of less than 0.10 pp. The time feature was identified as the primary separability driver in a post hoc classical ablation. Tree-based models were robust on physiological features alone. The surveyed methods provide a reproducible, noise-aware benchmark for wearable physiological signal classification; however, the reported high accuracies are based on a deliberately separable proof-of-concept benchmark and do not demonstrate clinical utility or a quantum advantage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computer Engineering and Informatics Department, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. Global, regional and national burden of anxiety disorders from 1990 to 2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 201910.1017/S2045796021000275 ↗
2. Treatment gap for anxiety disorders is global: Results of the World Mental Health Surveys in 21 countries10.1002/da.22711 ↗
3. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (2023, September 05). GBD Results Tool, Global Health Data Exchange. Available online: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results.
4. World Health Organization (2021, June 11). Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds).
5. Masri, D., Jaber, L., Mashal, R., Albourini, F., Alsaoud, M.A., and Al-Tarawneh, A.M.A. (2024). The Role of Wearables & Technology in Mental Health: Review. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Cyber Resilience (ICCR), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 26–28 February 2024, IEEE.10.1109/ICCR61006.2024.10532880 ↗
6. Recent Advances in Contactless Sensing Technologies for Mental Health Monitoring10.1109/JIOT.2021.3097801 ↗
7. Quantum computing enhanced distance-minimizing data-driven computational mechanics10.1016/j.cma.2023.116675 ↗
8. A systematic review of quantum machine learning for digital health10.1038/s41746-025-01597-z ↗
9. MAQML: A Meta-Approach to Quantum Machine Learning with Accentuated Sample Variations for Unobtrusive Mental Health Monitoring10.1007/s42484-023-00108-1 ↗
10. Imran, M., Aftab, U., Noreen, A., Ahmed, M.J., and Asghar, M. (2023). Quantum Computing for Healthcare: A Review. Future Internet, 15.10.3390/fi15030094 ↗
11. Onim, M.S.H., Humble, T.S., and Thapliyal, H. (2025). Emotion Recognition in Older Adults with Quantum Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors. arXiv.10.1109/ISVLSI65124.2025.11130356 ↗
12. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 ↗
13. Recent Advances in Quantum Computing for Drug Discovery and Development10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3376408 ↗
14. Sagheer, A., Zidan, M., and Abdelsamea, M.M. (2019). A Novel Autonomous Perceptron Model for Pattern Classification Applications. Entropy, 21.10.3390/e21080763 ↗
15. Quantum-Inspired Support Vector Machine10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3084467 ↗
16. Quantum neural networks for disease treatment identification
17. Selvan, R., Ørting, S., and Dam, E.B. (2020). Locally orderless tensor networks for classifying two- and three-dimensional medical images. arXiv.
18. Evolving deep convolutional neural networks by quantum behaved particle swarm optimization with binary encoding for image classification10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.026 ↗
19. Supervised learning with a quantum classifier using multi-level systems10.1007/s11128-020-2587-9 ↗
20. A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits10.1038/s41534-019-0157-8 ↗
21. Quantum machine learning architecture for COVID-19 classification based on synthetic data generation using conditional adversarial neural network10.1007/s12559-021-09926-6 ↗
22. A secure two-qubit quantum model for segmentation and classification of brain tumor using MRI images based on blockchain10.1007/s00521-022-07388-x ↗
23. Hybrid quantum-classical convolutional neural network model for COVID-19 prediction using chest X-ray images
24. Clinical data classification with noisy intermediate scale quantum computers10.1038/s41598-022-05971-9 ↗
25. Cervical precancerous lesion classification using quantum invasive weed optimization with deep learning on biomedical pap smear images10.1111/exsy.13308 ↗
26. 3D Quantum-Inspired Self-Supervised Tensor Network for Volumetric Segmentation of Medical Images10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3240238 ↗
27. Chen, Z., Xue, C., Chen, S., and Guo, G. (2019). VQNet: Library for a Quantum-Classical Hybrid Neural Network. arXiv.
28. Distance Estimation for Quantum Prototypes Based Clustering
29. Maheshwari, D., Garcia-Zapirain, B., and Sierra-Soso, D. (2020). Machine learning applied to diabetes dataset using Quantum versus Classical computation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT), Louisville, KY, USA, 9–11 December 2020, IEEE.10.1109/ISSPIT51521.2020.9408944 ↗
30. A hybrid quantum feature selection algorithm using a quantum-inspired graph theoretic approach10.1007/s10489-019-01604-3 ↗
31. Quantum Machine Learning Applied to Electronic Healthcare Records for Ischemic Heart Disease Classification
32. Quantum-inspired ensemble approach to multi-attributed and multi-agent decision-making10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107283 ↗
33. Variational Quantum Classifier for Binary Classification: Real vs. Synthetic Dataset10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139323 ↗
34. Comparative performance analysis of quantum machine learning with deep learning for diabetes prediction10.1007/s40747-021-00398-7 ↗
35. Quantum Driven Machine Learning10.1007/s10773-020-04656-1 ↗
36. Efficient Discrete Feature Encoding for Variational Quantum Classifier10.1109/TQE.2021.3103050 ↗
37. A Fully Connected Quantum Convolutional Neural Network for Classifying Ischemic Cardiopathy10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232307 ↗
38. A Quantum Mechanics-Based Framework for EEG Signal Feature Extraction and Classification10.1109/TETC.2020.3000734 ↗
39. Sridevi, S., Kanimozhi, T., Issac, K., and Sudha, M. (2022). Quanvolution Neural Network to Recognize Arrhythmia from 2D Scaleogram Features of ECG Signals. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Technologies and Innovative Applications in Information and Communication Technology (ICITIIT), IEEE.10.1109/ICITIIT54346.2022.9744224 ↗
40. Sameer, M., and Gupta, B. (2022). A Novel Hybrid Classical-Quantum Network to Detect Epileptic Seizures. medRxiv.10.1101/2022.05.18.22275295 ↗
41. Padha, A., and Sahoo, A. (2022). Quantum Enhanced Machine Learning for Unobtrusive Stress Monitoring. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3549206.3549288 ↗
42. Koike-Akino, T., and Wang, Y. (2022). quEEGNet: Quantum AI for Biosignal Processing. Proceedings of the IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), Ioannina, Greece, 27–30 September 2022, IEEE.10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926814 ↗
43. Padha, A., and Sahoo, A. (2022). A Parametrized Quantum LSTM Model for Continuous Stress Monitoring. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, India, 23–25 March 2022, IEEE.10.23919/INDIACom54597.2022.9763118 ↗
44. Metaheuristic optimized electrocardiography time-series anomaly classification with recurrent and long-short term neural networks
45. Minic, A., Jovanovic, L., Bacanin, N., Stoean, C., Zivkovic, M., Spalevic, P., Petrovic, A., Dobrojevic, M., and Stoean, R. (2023). Applying Recurrent Neural Networks for Anomaly Detection in Electrocardiogram Sensor Data. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23249878 ↗
46. Improving performance of extreme learning machine for classification challenges by modified firefly algorithm and validation on medical benchmark datasets10.1007/s11042-024-18295-9 ↗
47. Majhi, B., Kashyap, A., Mohanty, S.S., Dash, S., Mallik, S., Li, A., and Zhao, Z. (2024). An improved method for diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using deep learning models enhanced with metaheuristic algorithm. BMC Med. Imaging, 24.10.1186/s12880-024-01335-z ↗
48. Zivkovic, M., Bacanin, N., Antonijevic, M., Nikolic, B., Kvascev, G., Marjanovic, M., and Savanovic, N. (2022). Hybrid CNN and XGBoost Model Tuned by Modified Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for COVID-19 Early Diagnostics from X-ray Images. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11223798 ↗
49. Multi-Class Stress Detection through Heart Rate Variability: A Deep Neural Network Based Study10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3274478 ↗
50. A machine-learning approach for stress detection using wearable sensors in free-living environments10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108918 ↗
51. Intelligent fibers and textiles for wearable biosensors10.1002/rpm.20240018 ↗
52. Textile Hybrid Electronics for Multifunctional Wearable Integrated Systems10.34133/research.0779 ↗
53. Deep Learning Model Coupling Wearable Bioelectric and Mechanical Sensors for Refined Muscle Strength Assessment10.34133/research.0366 ↗
54. Schmidt, P., Reiss, A., Duerichen, R., Marberger, C., and Van Laerhoven, K. (2018). Introducing WESAD, a Multimodal Dataset for Wearable Stress and Affect Detection. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI ’18), Boulder, CO, USA, 16–20 October 2018, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3242969.3242985 ↗
55. Bolpagni, M., Pardini, S., Dianti, M., and Gabrielli, S. (2024). Personalized Stress Detection Using Biosignals from Wearables: A Scoping Review. Sensors, 24.10.20944/preprints202404.1829.v1 ↗
56. Photoplethysmography-based HRV analysis and machine learning for real-time stress quantification in mental health applications10.1063/5.0256590 ↗
57. Moser, M.K., Ehrhart, M., and Resch, B. (2024). An Explainable Deep Learning Approach for Stress Detection in Wearable Sensor Measurements. Sensors, 24.10.20944/preprints202407.0707.v1 ↗
58. Stress Detection Using Context-Aware Sensor Fusion from Wearable Devices10.1109/JIOT.2023.3265768 ↗
59. Large-scale wearable data reveal digital phenotypes for daily-life stress detection10.1038/s41746-018-0074-9 ↗
60. Ozpolat, Z., and Karabatak, M. (2023). Performance Evaluation of Quantum-Based Machine Learning Algorithms for Cardiac Arrhythmia Classification. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13061099 ↗
61. Iqbal, T., Simpkin, A.J., Roshan, D., Glynn, N., Killilea, J., Walsh, J., Molloy, G., Ganly, S., Ryman, H., and Coen, E. (2022). Stress Monitoring Using Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study and Stress-Predict Dataset. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22218135 ↗
62. Photoplethysmography-Based Respiratory Rate Estimation Algorithm for Health Monitoring Applications10.1007/s40846-022-00700-z ↗
63. Two Modifications of CNN10.1109/TSMC.1976.4309452 ↗
64. Pegasos: Primal Estimated sub-GrAdient SOlver for SVM10.1007/s10107-010-0420-4 ↗
65. Inference for the Generalization Error10.1023/A:1024068626366 ↗
66. Bouckaert, R.R., and Frank, E. (2004). Evaluating the Replicability of Significance Tests for Comparing Learning Algorithms. Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD), Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-24775-3_3 ↗
67. Grandvalet, Y., and Bengio, Y. (2004). Hypothesis Testing for Cross-Validation, Université de Montréal. Technical Report.
68. Bayle, P., Bayle, A., Janson, L., and Mackey, L. (2020, January 6–12). Cross-Validation Confidence Intervals for Test Error. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Virtual.
69. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Breakthroughs in Statistics, Springer.10.1214/aos/1176344552 ↗
70. A Comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for Assessing the Equivalence of Average Bioavailability10.1007/BF01068419 ↗
71. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 ↗
72. IBM Quantum (2026, May 30). IBM Quantum Challenge Fall 2021: Challenge 3—Quantum Machine Learning, GitHub Repository. Available online: https://github.com/qiskit-community/ibm-quantum-challenge-fall-2021.
73. Liu, Y., Otten, M., Bassirianjahromi, R., Jiang, L., and Fefferman, B. (2022). Benchmarking near-term quantum computers via random circuit sampling. arXiv.
74. IBM Quantum (2026, May 30). Maximum Execution Time for Qiskit Runtime Workloads. IBM Quantum Documentation. Available online: https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/guides/max-execution-time.
75. Li, G., Ding, Y., and Xie, Y. (2019). Tackling the Qubit Mapping Problem for NISQ-Era Quantum Devices. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3297858.3304023 ↗
76. Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180509 ↗
77. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2 ↗
78. Singh, K., and Pokhrel, P. (2025). Modeling Feature Maps for Quantum Machine Learning. arXiv.
79. Shaffer, F., and Ginsberg, J.P. (2017). An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front. Public Health, 5.10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258 ↗
80. Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms10.1038/s41467-021-27045-6 ↗
81. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets10.1038/nature23879 ↗
82. Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits10.1038/s41467-021-21728-w ↗
83. Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization10.1109/7.705889 ↗
84. Benchmarking of different optimizers in the variational quantum algorithms for applications in quantum chemistry10.1063/5.0161057 ↗