journal article·2026-06-16Open access

Managing Post-Phytoremediation Biomass Within a Circular Economy Framework: Multitrophic Ecotoxicological Assessment of Biomass, Derived Biochar and Their Leachable Fractions

Piotr Cichy, Joanna Kalka, Sebastian Żabczyński, Patrycja Wąsik, Agnieszka Korus, Michał Chabiński, Andrzej Szlęk

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 12

Abstract

Phytoremediation is a sustainable approach for the remediation of heavy metal–contaminated soils; however, the management of contaminated biomass generated during this process remains an insufficiently addressed challenge. Such biomass constitutes a secondary waste stream that may release mobile pollutants and pose environmental risks. In this study, an integrated ecotoxicological assessment framework was applied to evaluate phytoremediation-derived biomass and its transformation products obtained via pyrolysis. Two types of woody biomass with different heavy metal contents and their corresponding biochars produced at 700 °C were investigated. A multitrophic battery of bioassays combining direct exposure assays using terrestrial organisms (higher plants, Eisenia fetida, and soil microbial activity) with leachate-based assays using aquatic organisms (Lemna minor, Daphnia magna, and Aliivibrio fischeri) was applied. Untreated biomass exhibited high to extreme toxicity in aquatic systems (toxic units, TU >100) and significant phytotoxic effects. Pyrolysis substantially reduced contaminant mobility and ecotoxicity of leachates, resulting in lower toxicity (TU typically <15) and no significant effects on plant growth, earthworm survival, or soil microbial functional diversity. Residual toxicity was linked to elevated pH and trace amounts of thermally generated organic substances. These results demonstrate that pyrolysis effectively reduces the environmental risk of contaminated biomass and supports the use of multitrophic ecotoxicological testing for safe waste valorization within circular economy strategies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Heavy metals in environment · Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Environmental Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Department of Thermal Technology, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 22, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Funding

National Science Center

References (91)

Show source-provided references
1. (2026, February 11). UN General Assembly, A/RES/70/1: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
2. FAO, and UNEP (2021). Global Assessment of Soil Pollution–Summary for Policy Makers, FAO.
3. Paya, P.A., and Rodriguez, E.N. (2018). Status of Local Soil Contamination in Europe: Revision of the Indicator “Progress in the Management Contaminated Sites in Europe, Publications Office of the European Union. EUR 29124 EN.
4. Evaluation methods for assessing effectiveness of in situ remediation of soil and sediment contaminated with organic pollutants and heavy metals10.1016/j.envint.2017.05.001 ↗
5. Sharma, J.K., Kumar, N., Singh, N.P., and Santal, A.R. (2023). Phytoremediation technologies and their mechanism for removal of heavy metal from contaminated soil: An approach for a sustainable environment. Front. Plant Sci., 14.10.3389/fpls.2023.1076876 ↗
6. Yan, A., Wang, Y., Tan, S.N., Mohd Yusof, M.L., Ghosh, S., and Chen, Z. (2020). Phytoremediation: A promising approach for revegetation of heavy metal-polluted land. Front. Plant Sci., 11.10.3389/fpls.2020.00359 ↗
7. Importance of biomass management acts and policies after phytoremediation10.1186/s41610-017-0033-4 ↗
8. A review on recent disposal of hazardous sewage sludge via anaerobic digestion and novel composting10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126995 ↗
9. Białowiec, A., Pulka, J., Styczyńska, M., Koziel, J.A., Kalka, J., Jureczko, M., Felis, E., and Manczarski, P. (2020). Is biochar from the torrefaction of sewage sludge hazardous waste?. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13163544 ↗
10. Edgar, V.-N., Fabián, F.-L., Mario, P.-C.J., and Ileana, V.-R. (2021). Coupling plant biomass derived from phytoremediation of potential toxic-metal-polluted soils to bioenergy production and high-value by-products—A review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11072982 ↗
11. Advances and future directions of biochar characterization methods and applications10.1080/10643389.2017.1421844 ↗
12. Biochar technology in wastewater treatment: A critical review10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126539 ↗
13. Biochar as a catalyst10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.002 ↗
14. Effect of biochar amendment on compost quality, gaseous emissions and pathogen reduction during in-vessel composting of chicken manure10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131129 ↗
15. Biochar for agronomy, animal farming, anaerobic digestion, composting, water treatment, soil remediation, construction, energy storage, and carbon sequestration: A review10.1007/s10311-022-01424-x ↗
16. Biochar: Carbon sequestration, land remediation, and impacts on soil microbiology10.1080/10643389.2011.574115 ↗
17. Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant10.1007/s42773-020-00065-z ↗
18. Engineered designer biochar for contaminant removal/immobilization from soil and water: Potential and implication of biochar modification10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.043 ↗
19. Biochar in agriculture—A systematic review of 26 global meta-analyses10.1111/gcbb.12889 ↗
20. The different faces of biochar: Contamination risk versus remediation tool10.3846/16486897.2016.1254089 ↗
21. Potential hazards of biochar: The negative environmental impacts of biochar applications10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126611 ↗
22. The dark side of black gold: Ecotoxicological aspects of biochar and biochar-amended soils10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123833 ↗
23. Plant-driven removal of heavy metals from soil: Uptake, translocation, tolerance mechanism, challenges, and future perspectives10.1007/s10661-016-5211-9 ↗
24. A state-of-the-art review of the fate of heavy metals and product properties from pyrolysis of heavy-metal(loid)-enriched biomass harvested from phytoextraction10.1002/ep.13979 ↗
25. A review on the migration and transformation of heavy metals in the process of sludge pyrolysis10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106452 ↗
26. Contaminants in biochar and suggested mitigation measures—A review10.1016/j.cej.2021.132287 ↗
27. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in biochar—Their formation, occurrence and analysis: A review10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.09.001 ↗
28. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds in biochar and biochar-amended soil: A review10.1111/gcbb.12363 ↗
29. (2021). Waste Characterisation—Preparation of Waste Samples for Ecotoxicity Tests (Standard No. EN 14735:2021).
30. Enzymatic activity of forest soils in the region of influence of deposition from zinc and lead smelter “Miasteczko Śląskie”
31. Accumulation levels of zinc, cadmium and lead in the topsoil layer of forest soils in the vicinity of the Miasteczko Śląskie zinc smelter
32. Evaluation of contamination of Zn-Pb industry degraded areas using spatial information10.12912/23920629/70265 ↗
33. Activated biochars from heavy metal-contaminated biomass for CO2 capture: Adsorption performance and dominant mechanisms10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103217 ↗
34. (2002). Characterisation of Waste—Leaching—Compliance Test for Leaching of Granular Waste Materials and Sludges—Part 2: One Stage Batch Test at a Liquid to Solid Ratio of 10 L/kg for Materials with Particle Size Below 4 mm (Without or with Size Reduction) (Standard No. EN 12457-2:2002).
35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006). Test No. 221: Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing.
36. A linear interpolation method for subletal toxicity: The inhibition concentration (ICp) approach. Version 2.0
37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004). Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. Acute immobilisation test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing.
38. (2007). Water Quality—Determination of the Inhibitory Effect of Waste Samples on the Light Emission of Vibrio fischeri (Luminescent bacteria Test)—Part 3: Method Using Freeze-Dried Bacteria (Standard No. ISO 11348-3:2007).
39. A practical and user-friendly toxicity classification system with microbiotests for natural waters and wastewaters
40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1984). Test No. 207: Earthworm, acute toxicity tests. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing.
41. MicroBioTests Inc (2026, June 07). Phytotoxkit. Seed Germination and Early Growth Microbiotest with Higher Plants. Standard Operational Procedure. Available online: http://www.microbiotests.be/SOPs/Phytotoxkit%20SOP%20-%20A5.pdf.
42. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006). Test No. 208: Terrestrial Plant Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing.
43. Earthworm avoidance of biochar can be mitigated by wetting10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.019 ↗
44. (2008). Soil Quality—Avoidance Test for Determining the Quality of Soils and Effects of Chemicals on Behaviour—Part 1: Test with Earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Eisenia andrei) (Standard No. ISO 17512-1:2008).
45. The Biolog plates technique as a tool in ecological studies of microbial communities
46. Degradation of 4-chlorophenol and microbial diversity in soil inoculated with single Pseudomonas sp. CF600 and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia KB210.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.052 ↗
47. The logistic (Verhulst) model for sigmoid microbial growth curves revisited10.1016/j.foodres.2007.01.012 ↗
48. Zelený, D. (2025, July 27). Diversity indices. Analytical Community Ecology in R (anadat-r). Available online: https://www.davidzeleny.net/anadat-r/doku.php/en:div-ind.
49. Németh, I., László, K., Bulátkó, A., Vaszita, E., and Molnár, M. (2023). Ecotoxicity assessment of graphene oxides using test organisms from three hierarchical trophic levels to evaluate their potential environmental risk. Nanomaterials, 13.10.3390/nano13212858 ↗
50. A Water Quality Index—Do We Dare?
51. Problems in the assessment of heavy-metal levels in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index10.1007/BF02414780 ↗
52. Development of river water quality indices—A review10.1007/s10661-015-5050-0 ↗
53. A critical review on sustainable biochar system through gasification: Energy and environmental applications10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.177 ↗
54. Effect of lignocellulosic components on the hydrothermal carbonization reaction pathway and product properties of protein10.1016/j.energy.2022.125063 ↗
55. Skuza, L., Szućko-Kociuba, I., Filip, E., and Bożek, I. (2022). Natural molecular mechanisms of plant hyperaccumulation and hypertolerance towards heavy metals. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms23169335 ↗
56. Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: A comprehensive meta-data analysis review10.1007/s42773-020-00067-x ↗
57. Singh, B., Dolk, M.M., Shen, Q., and Camps-Arbestain, M. (2017). Biochar pH, electrical conductivity and liming potential. Biochar: A Guide to Analytical Methods, CSIRO.10.1071/9781486305100 ↗
58. Biochar physicochemical properties: Pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3 ↗
59. Study on the toxicity of binary equitoxic mixtures of metals using the luminescent bacteria Vibrio fischeri as a biological target10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.007 ↗
60. Acute toxicity of metals and reference toxicants to a freshwater ostracod, Cypris subglobosa (Sowerby, 1840) and correlation to EC50 values of other test models10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.038 ↗
61. Assessing the effects of tropical wood leachate to Desmodesmus subspicatus, Lemna minor and Daphnia magna10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04268 ↗
62. Toxicity and chemistry of aspen wood leachate to aquatic life: Field study10.1897/02-183 ↗
63. The sensitivity of Lemna gibba G-3 and four clones of Lemna minor to eight common chemicals using a 7-day test
64. Short communication: A comparison of the toxicity of 30 reference chemicals to Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulex
65. Toxicity of 58 substituted anilines and phenols to algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and bacteria Vibrio fischeri: Comparison with published data and QSARs10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.023 ↗
66. The effect of pH on the population growth of three species of duckweed: Spirodela oligorrhiza, Lemna minor and Wolffia arrhiza10.1111/j.1365-2427.1976.tb01596.x ↗
67. Effects of pH on survival, growth and reproduction rates of the crustacean
68. Interactions between pH, potassium, calcium, bromide, and phenol and their effects on the bioluminescence of Vibrio fischeri10.1080/15287394.2010.482918 ↗
69. Biochar properties regarding to contaminants content and ecotoxicological assessment10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.044 ↗
70. Toxicity of biochars after polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal by thermal treatment10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.004 ↗
71. Potential risk of biochar-amended soil to aquatic systems: An evaluation based on aquatic bioassays10.1007/s10646-014-1344-1 ↗
72. High-VOC biochar-effectiveness of post-treatment measures and potential health risks related to handling and storage10.1007/s11356-016-7112-4 ↗
73. Microbiological, biochemical and ecotoxicological evaluation of soils in the area of biochar production in relation to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.027 ↗
74. Ecotoxicological assessment of sewage sludge-derived biochars-amended soil10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116484 ↗
75. Phenolic matter from deadwood can impact forest soil properties10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.014 ↗
76. Phytotoxicity dynamics of decaying plant materials10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01611.x ↗
77. Acute toxicity of heavy metals (copper, lead, zinc), phenol and sodium on Allium cepa L., Lepidium sativum L. and Daphnia magna St.: Comparative investigations and the practical applications10.1016/0043-1354(94)00178-A ↗
78. Root elongation method for toxicity testing of organic and inorganic pollutants10.1002/etc.5620060509 ↗
79. Validation of germination rate and root elongation as indicator to assess phytotoxicity with Cucumis sativus10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00520-8 ↗
80. Chemical and ecotoxicological evaluation of biochar produced from residues of biogas production10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.013 ↗
81. How biochar works, and when it doesn’t: A review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar10.1111/gcbb.12885 ↗
82. Influence of biochar particle size on biota responses10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.044 ↗
83. Effects of biochar and thermally treated biochar on Eisenia fetida survival, growth, lysosomal membrane stability and oxidative stress10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144778 ↗
84. Soil bacterial functional diversity as influenced by organic amendment application10.1016/j.biortech.2005.06.021 ↗
85. Li, L., Xu, M., Ali, M., Zhang, W., Duan, Y., and Li, D. (2018). Factors affecting soil microbial biomass and functional diversity with the application of organic amendments in three contrasting cropland soils during a field experiment. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0203812 ↗
86. Changes of enzymatic activities, substrate utilization pattern, and microbial community diversity in heavy metal-contaminated soils10.1007/s11270-020-04798-2 ↗
87. Effect of lead, cadmium, and mercury co-contaminants on biodegradation in PAH-polluted soils10.1002/ldr.2958 ↗
88. Biochar increases soil microbial biomass but has variable effects on microbial diversity: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141593 ↗
89. Plant-driven selection of microbes10.1007/s11104-008-9814-y ↗
90. Chauhan, P., Sharma, N., Tapwal, A., Kumar, A., Verma, G.S., Meena, M., Seth, C.S., and Swapnil, P. (2023). Soil microbiome: Diversity, benefits and interactions with plants. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151914643 ↗
91. Exploring the synergistic impacts of cover crops and fertilization on soil microbial metabolic diversity in dryland soybean production systems using Biolog EcoPlates10.3390/applbiosci2030022 ↗