journal article·2004-06

A numerical process control method for circular-tube hydroforming prediction

K.I. Johnson, B. N. Nguyen, R.W. Davies, G.J. Grant, M.A. Khaleel

Publisher page

Abstract

A numerical control algorithm is described that predicts the axial end-feed and internal pressure loads to give maximum formability of circular tubes during hydroforming. The controller tracks the stresses, strains and mechanical response of the incremental finite element solution to estimate the proper axial feed (end-feed) and internal pressure increments to apply in the next increment as the tube deforms. The algorithm uses the material stress–strain curve and the deformation theory of plasticity with Hill`s criterion to relate the current stress and strain increments (from the finite element model) to the next applied load increments. A controlled increment in plastic strain is prescribed for the next solution increment, and the pressure and end-feed increments are calculated to give a constant ratio of incremental axial and hoop strains. Hydroforming simulations using this method were conducted to predict the load histories for controlled expansion of 6061-T4 aluminum tubes within a conical die shape and under free hydroforming conditions. The predicted loading paths were applied in hydroforming experiments to form the conical and free-formed tube shapes. The model predictions and experimental results are compared in this paper for deformed shape, strains and the extent of forming at rupture.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Analytical modeling of tube hydroforming10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00018-X ↗
2. Theoretical and experimental analysis of stroke-controlled tube hydroforming10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00646-2 ↗
3. Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets––part 1: theory10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
4. Chen, X. M., and S. D. Liu. 2000. Experimental simulation study on tube bending and hydroforming. In: SAE 2000 World Congress, Detroit, 6–9 March 2000. SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-1114.10.4271/2000-01-1114 ↗
5. Modeling the Bauschinger effect for sheet metals, part I10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00046-8 ↗
6. Inelastic effects on springback in metals10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00054-7 ↗
7. Davies, R.W., Grant, G.J., Herling, D.R., Smith, M.T., Evert, R., Nykerk, S., Shoup, J., 2000. Formability investigation of aluminum extrusions under hydroforming conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2000 International Body Engineering Conference, Detroit, MI, 3–5 October 2000. SAE Technical Paper Series No. 2000-01-2675.10.4271/2000-01-2675 ↗
8. Davies, R.W., Grant, G.J., Shah, K.N., Chu, E.W., Evert, R.P., Smith, M.T., 2002. Experimental evaluation of the formability of aluminum extrusions during tube hydroforming. In: Plasticity 2002, Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Plasticity and Its Current Applications. NEAT Press, Fulton, MD, pp. 388–390.
9. Doege, E., Kosters, R., Ropers, C., 1998. Determination of optimized control parameters for internal high pressure forming processes with the FEM. In: Proceedings of Sheet Metal 1998, University of Twente, 6–8 April, pp. 119–128.
10. Edgar, K., 1999. The selection of pre-process steps for body structure hydroformed components. In: SAE International Body Engineering Conference and Exposition. Detroit, MI, 28–30 September. SAE Technical Paper No. 1999-01-3183.10.4271/1999-01-3183 ↗
11. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic materials10.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
12. Prediction of forming pressure curve for hydroforming processes using artificial neural network10.1243/PIME_PROC_1994_208_315_02 ↗
13. Forming limits prediction using rate-independent polycrystalline plasticity10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00077-2 ↗
14. Prediction of forming limits and parameters in the tube hydroforming process10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00048-7 ↗
15. Prediction of the forming limit in hydroforming processes using the finite element method and a ductile fracture criterion10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00694-X ↗
16. Analysis and design of hydroforming processes by the rigid-plastic finite element method10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00568-4 ↗
17. Liu, J., 2001. Tube hydroforming process development with the aid of computer simulation. Society of Automotive Engineers. 2001-01-1134.10.4271/2001-01-1134 ↗
18. On the r-value of textured sheet metals10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00064-X ↗
19. 2002
20. Analysis of tube hydroforming using an inverse approach with FLD-based adjustment of process parameters10.1115/1.1555651 ↗
21. CMAC-based learning controller for pressure tracking control of hydroforming processes
22. Fuzzy self-learning control method with application to hydroforming processes10.1115/1.2804334 ↗
23. Design of load-curves for hydroforming applications10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00738-X ↗
24. Influence of transverse normal stress on sheet metal formability10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00035-9 ↗
25. A general forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming10.1016/S0020-7403(98)00113-1 ↗
26. A non-associated flow rule for sheet metal forming10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00053-5 ↗
27. Thannhauser, P., 1989. A direct method of obtaining the critical load of inelastic columns. In: Experimental Techniques. Society of Experimental Mechanics.10.1111/j.1747-1567.1989.tb01460.x ↗
28. Anisotropic plasticity for sheet metals using the concept of combined isotropic-kinematic hardening10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00060-2 ↗
29. Failure analysis of tubular hydroforming10.1115/1.1394966 ↗
30. Numerical analysis and design for tubular hydroforming10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00046-1 ↗
31. The tube bending technology of a hydroforming process for and automotive part10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00505-2 ↗
32. Prediction of forming limit curves using an anisotropic yield function with prestrain induced backstress10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00022-5 ↗
33. Ziekiewicz · 2000