journal article·2026-06-15Open access

Latency in IOT-Enabled Digital Twin Systems for Smart Manufacturing: A Review of the Taxonomy and Measurement

Jorge Arturo Pinedo Gaucin, Barbara Alexandra Anaya Sánchez, Luis Asunción Pérez-Domínguez, David Luviano-Cruz, Roberto Romero López, Nelly Rigaud Téllez, Diana Ortiz-Muñoz, Judith Gallegos Padilla

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 12

Abstract

The application of Internet of Things (IoT) technology to Digital Twin (DT) in smart manufacturing has opened significant opportunities for real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and closed-loop control; however, the inherent latency that exists in these architectures (the temporal gap between a physical event and its reflection in a digital model) remains one of the most significant and least systematically understood barriers to fulfill its full potential. This paper aims to propose a formal four-layer taxonomy of latency sources in IoT-based Digital Twin systems for smart manufacturing and to review the current approaches and tools that are available for their measurement. The PRISMA protocol has been used to perform a systematic literature review, where 58 primary survey studies published between 2020 and 2026 were extracted from IEEE Xplore, Elsevier Scopus, Google Scholar and arXiv, with all the studies being coded along six dimensions (architectural layer, application domain, latency metrics reported, evaluation methodology, quantitative impact, and enabling technologies). The proposed taxonomy presents 28 different types of latencies under four layers: (L1) network, (L2) compute, (L3) data, and (L4) end-to-end (E2E), whose magnitudes vary from 0.1 ms for local network propagation to tail latencies above 500 ms in production (P99). Three categories and three cross-layer interaction patterns are formalized here and are absent from prior partial taxonomies. Among the most promising results is the finding that several high-impact interventions require no infrastructure investment: a protocol migration from Modbus to WebSocket reduces telemetry latency by 32%, while Age of Information-aware synchronization and clock drift correction deliver substantial data layer gains through software updates alone, yet remain underutilized. The review identifies a systematic under-reporting of tail-latency percentiles across the corpus, the lack of a cross-protocol jitter benchmark, and a predominance of simulation-based evaluation over real-hardware measurement. The systematic review contributions of this paper (the formal four-layer taxonomy, the proportional metric audit across the 58 papers, and the formalization of three cross-layer interaction patterns) are derived from cross-corpus analysis. The investigation also identifies three open research directions (a standardized manufacturing IoT-DT benchmark, cross-layer joint optimization frameworks, and wireless TSN validation on real manufacturing testing grounds) that together form a well-organized and practical basis to advance both the science and the application of ultra-low-latency Digital Twin technology in the industrial field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Network Time Synchronization Technologies · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juárez, Av. del Charro 450 Norte, Ciudad Juárez 32310, Chihuahua, Mexico

Division of Physical, Mathematical, and Engineering Sciences, Aragón School of Superior Studies, National Autonomous University of México, Avenida Universidad Nacional S/N, Ciudad Nezahualcóyotl 57130, Estado de México, Mexico

Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics, Ciudad Juárez Institute of Technology, Av. Tecnológico 1340, Ciudad Juárez 32500, Chihuahua, Mexico

Funding

Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación · Universidad Atonóma de Ciudad Juárez

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Digital Twin to Improve the Virtual-Real Integration of Industrial IoT
2. Somanath, S., Naserentin, V., Eleftheriou, O., Sjölie, D., Wästberg, B., and Logg, A. (2024). Towards Urban Digital Twins: A Workflow for Procedural Visualization Using Geospatial Data. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16111939 ↗
3. Kherbache, M., Maimour, M., and Rondeau, E.B. (2021). When Digital Twin Meets Network Softwarization in the Industrial IoT: Real-Time Requirements Case Study. Ital. Natl. Conf. Sens., 21.10.3390/s21248194 ↗
4. Qian, C., Liu, X., Ripley, C., Qian, M., Liang, F., and Yu, W. (2022). Digital Twin—Cyber Replica of Physical Things: Architecture, Applications and Future Research Directions. Future Internet, 14.10.3390/fi14020064 ↗
5. A Survey on Digital Twin for Industrial Internet of Things: Applications, Technologies and Tools10.1109/COMST.2023.3297395 ↗
6. INTERLINK: A Digital Twin-Assisted Storage Strategy for Satellite-Terrestrial Networks10.1109/TAES.2022.3169130 ↗
7. Cakir, L.V., Al-Shareeda, S., Oktug, S.F., Özdem, M., Broadbent, M., and Canberk, B. (2023, January 6–8). How to Synchronize Digital Twins? A Communication Performance Analysis. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 28th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD), Edinburgh, UK.10.1109/CAMAD59638.2023.10478422 ↗
8. Delay-Aware Digital Twin Synchronization in Mobile Edge Networks with Semantic Communications10.1109/TVT.2025.3548844 ↗
9. Cross-Layer Optimization for Industrial Internet of Things in Real Scene Digital Twins10.1109/JIOT.2022.3152634 ↗
10. Van Huynh, D., Nguyen, V.-D., Sharma, V., Dobre, O.A., and Duong, T.Q. (2022). Digital Twin Empowered Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications-Based Edge Networks in Industrial IoT Environment. ICC 2022—IEEE International Conference on Communications, IEEE.10.1109/ICC45855.2022.9838860 ↗
11. Digital Twin Synchronization with Real Time Data Collection
12. Ramirez, R., Huang, C.-Y., and Liang, S.-H. (2022). 5G Digital Twin: A Study of Enabling Technologies. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12157794 ↗
13. Latency Analysis of WebSocket and Industrial Protocols in Real-Time Digital Twin Integration10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I1P110 ↗
14. IEEE Standards Association (2026, June 11). IEC/IEEE International Standard—Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems. Available online: https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/61588/10624/.
15. Survey on Digital Twin Edge Networks (DITEN) Toward 6G10.1109/OJCOMS.2022.3197811 ↗
16. A Comprehensive Survey on Revolutionizing Connectivity Through Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Digital Twin Network in 6G
17. Detecting Latent Topics and Trends of Digital Twins in Healthcare: A Structural Topic Model-Based Systematic Review10.1177/20552076231203672 ↗
18. Fu, Y., Guo, D., Li, Q., Liu, L., Qu, S., and Xiang, W. (2022). Digital Twin Based Network Latency Prediction in Vehicular Networks. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11142217 ↗
19. Zami, M.B.A., Shaon, S., Quy, V.K., and Nguyen, D.C. (2024). Digital Twin in Industries: A Comprehensive Survey. arXiv.
20. Connecting the Twins: A Review on Digital Twin Technology & Its Networking Requirements10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.039 ↗
21. Digital Twin for 6G: Taxonomy, Research Challenges, and the Road Ahead10.1109/OJCOMS.2022.3219015 ↗
22. Digital Twin-Empowered Intelligent Computation Offloading for Edge Computing in the Era of 5G and beyond: A State-of-the-Art Survey10.1016/j.icte.2025.01.002 ↗
23. Edge Computing for Industry 5.0: Fundamental, Applications, and Research Challenges10.1109/JIOT.2024.3359297 ↗
24. Tao, Z., Xu, W., Huang, Y., Wang, X., and You, X. (2023). Wireless Network Digital Twin for 6G: Generative AI as a Key Enabler. arXiv.10.1109/MWC.002.2300564 ↗
25. Wysocki, O., Schwab, B., Biswanath, M.K., Greza, M., Zhang, Q., Zhu, J., Froech, T., Heeramaglore, M., Hijazi, I., and Kanna, K. (2025). TUM2TWIN: Introducing the Large-Scale Multimodal Urban Digital Twin Benchmark Dataset. arXiv.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.12.013 ↗
26. Khan, L.U., Saad, W., Niyato, D., Han, Z., and Hong, C.S. (2021). Digital-Twin-Enabled 6G: Vision, Architectural Trends, and Future Directions. arXiv.10.1109/MCOM.001.21143 ↗
27. Yin, P., Liang, W., Wen, J., Kang, J., Chen, J., and Niyato, D. (2026). Multi-Agent DRL for Multi-Objective Twin Migration Routing with Workload Prediction in 6G-Enabled IoV. arXiv.10.1109/TMC.2026.3672525 ↗
28. Kalasapura, D. (2023). A Digital Twin Synchronization Protocol for Bandwidth-Limited IoT Applications. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120343.
29. Tan, J., Sha, X., Dai, B., and Lu, T. (2020). Wireless Technology and Protocol for IIoT and Digital Twins. 2020 ITU Kaleidoscope: Industry-Driven Digital Transformation (ITU K), IEEE.10.23919/ITUK50268.2020.9303189 ↗
30. Enabling Low-Latency Digital Twins for Large-Scale UAV Networks Using MQTT-Based Communication Framework10.1016/j.icte.2025.01.001 ↗
31. QoS-Aware Deployment and Synchronization of Digital Twins Over Federated Cloud Platforms for Smart Infrastructure Monitoring
32. Digital-Twin-Enabled Intelligent Distributed Clock Synchronization in Industrial IoT Systems10.1109/JIOT.2020.3029131 ↗
33. Grieves, M. (2016). Origins of the Digital Twin Concept, NASA.
34. Sharma, L., and Garg, P.K. (2025). Digital Twins and Simulation Technology: Concepts and Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC. [1st ed.].10.1201/9781003582489 ↗
35. Implementation and Evaluation of Digital Twin Framework for Internet of Things Based Healthcare Systems10.1049/wss2.12101 ↗
36. Real-Time Greenhouse Management Using IoT, Digital Twin, and Augmented Reality for Optimal Control and Decision-Making10.21014/actaimeko.v14i2.1988 ↗
37. Digital Twins: Enabling Interoperability in Smart Manufacturing Networks10.3390/telecom4020016 ↗
38. Liang, Y., Li, G., Zhang, G., Guo, J., Liu, Q., Zheng, J., and Wang, T. (2024). Latency Reduction in Immersive Systems through Request Scheduling with Digital Twin Networks in Collaborative Edge Computing. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw.10.1145/3701562 ↗
39. Adaptive Edge Association for Wireless Digital Twin Networks in 6G10.1109/JIOT.2021.3098508 ↗
40. Robust Constant Curvature Curve Communications with Complex and Quaternion Neural Networks10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3418915 ↗
41. Digital Twin-Assisted Multi-Layer Networks for Low-Latency and Energy-Efficient Communication10.1016/j.comcom.2025.108219 ↗
42. Digital Twin-Assisted Edge Computation Offloading in Industrial Internet of Things with NOMA10.1109/TVT.2023.3270859 ↗
43. Distributed Communication and Computation Resource Management for Digital Twin-Aided Edge Computing with Short-Packet Communications10.1109/JSAC.2023.3310087 ↗
44. Chukhno, O., Chukhno, N., Araniti, G., Campolo, C., Iera, A., and Molinaro, A. (2020). Optimal Placement of Social Digital Twins in Edge IoT Networks. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20216181 ↗
45. Placement of Social Digital Twins at the Edge for Beyond 5G IoT Networks10.1109/JIOT.2022.3190737 ↗
46. Digital Twins and Multi-Access Edge Computing for IIoT10.1016/j.vrih.2022.07.005 ↗
47. Qiu, S., Zhao, J., Lv, Y., Dai, J., Chen, F., Wang, Y., and Li, A. (2022). Digital-Twin-Assisted Edge-Computing Resource Allocation Based on the Whale Optimization Algorithm. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22239546 ↗
48. Blockchain and Federated Learning Based on Aggregation Techniques for Industrial IoT: A Contemporary Survey10.1007/s12083-025-01991-0 ↗
49. Communication-Efficient Federated Learning for Digital Twin Edge Networks in Industrial IoT10.1109/TII.2020.3010798 ↗
50. Reducing Offloading Latency for Digital Twin Edge Networks in 6G10.1109/TVT.2020.3018817 ↗
51. Alhartomi, M.A., Salh, A., Audah, L., Alzahrani, S., Alzahmi, A., Altimania, M.R., Alotaibi, A., Alsulami, R., and Al-Hartomy, O. (2023). Sustainable Resource Allocation and Reduce Latency Based on Federated-Learning-Enabled Digital Twin in IoT Devices. Ital. Natl. Conf. Sens., 23.10.3390/s23167262 ↗
52. Li, J., Guo, S., Liang, W., Wu, J., Chen, Q., Xu, Z., Xu, W., and Wang, J. (2023). Wait for Fresh Data? Digital Twin Empowered IoT Services in Edge Computing. 2023 IEEE 20th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Smart Systems (MASS), IEEE.10.1109/MASS58611.2023.00056 ↗
53. Digital Predistortion of 5G Multiuser MIMO Transmitters Using Low-Dimensional Feature-Based Model Generation10.1109/TMTT.2021.3129777 ↗
54. Picoreau, M., Simiscuka, A.A., and Muntean, G.-M. (2025). aDapT-XR: Adaptive Data Allocation and Prioritization for Synchronizing Real and Virtual Worlds in XR Digital Twins. 2025 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB), IEEE.10.1109/BMSB65076.2025.11165558 ↗
55. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Aided Edge Networks with Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications: A Digital Twin Approach10.1049/sil2.12128 ↗
56. Wireless 6G Connectivity for Massive Number of Devices and Critical Services10.1109/JPROC.2024.3484529 ↗
57. RIS-Empowered MEC for URLLC Systems with Digital-Twin-Driven Architecture10.1109/TCOMM.2023.3333345 ↗
58. TwinGuard: A Supervised Machine Learning Framework for DoS Attack Detection in IoT-Enabled Digital Twins Using Random Forest and Feature Selection Optimization10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3629026 ↗
59. Low-Latency Federated Learning and Blockchain for Edge Association in Digital Twin Empowered 6G Networks10.1109/TII.2020.3017668 ↗