Charge-Consistent Estimation of Hydrogen Production in a Membraneless Alkaline Water Electrolyzer Using Time-Resolved Current Measurements
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents a phenomenological estimation framework for a membraneless alkaline water electrolyzer (MAWE), developed primarily from experimentally measured current signals and end-of-test mass-loss data. Thirteen KOH concentrations (5–35 g in 1 L deionized water) were investigated under a constant 12 V DC supply for 7200 s. The time-varying current was continuously recorded throughout each experiment, while the total gas production was determined from the net mass loss measured at the end of the electrolysis process. A time-resolved hydrogen-production representation was subsequently reconstructed from the measured current signal using Faraday’s law and constrained to be stoichiometrically consistent with the experimentally observed total mass loss. The term “charge-consistent” used throughout this study does not imply a new electrochemical principle, but rather refers to maintaining physical consistency between the experimentally measured current signal, Faraday-based charge transfer, and the experimentally observed end-of-test mass loss within the proposed phenomenological framework. Experimental results indicate that both the current response and the cumulative gas production exhibit a strong and distinctly nonlinear dependence on the KOH concentration. Two phenomenological modeling approaches were examined. The first is a static polynomial formulation describing the nonlinear relationship between the measured current signal and the reconstructed production rate. The second is a semi-empirical grey-box formulation in which the Faraday-based theoretical production term is corrected using an experimentally identified efficiency coefficient. Model performance was assessed using train/test data partitioning, residual analysis, autocorrelation functions, and Ljung–Box tests, demonstrating a high degree of internal charge consistency and macroscopic agreement with the reconstructed experimental representation. The proposed framework provides a reduced-order and experimentally accessible approach for representing reconstructed production behavior in MAWE systems without resorting to detailed multi-physics modeling or EIS-based characterization and offers a physically consistent baseline for comparison with more complex data-driven or control-oriented modeling strategies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Batman University, 72100 Batman, Türkiye
Department of Computer Engineering, Bitlis Eren University, 13100 Bitlis, Türkiye
Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden
Sustainable Digitalisation Research Centre, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden
Biofilms Research Center for Biointerfaces (BRCB), Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Cozzolino, R., and Bella, G. (2024). A review of electrolyzer-based systems providing grid ancillary services: Current status, market, challenges and future directions. Front. Energy Res., 12.10.3389/fenrg.2024.1358333 ↗
2. A comprehensive review of alkaline water electrolysis mathematical modeling10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120099 ↗
3. A review of alkaline electrolyzer technology modeling and applications for decision-making optimization in energy systems10.1016/j.rser.2025.116005 ↗
4. Dynamic operation of water electrolyzers: A review for applications in photovoltaic systems integration10.1016/j.rser.2023.113407 ↗
5. Jiang, Y.-C., Dong, S.-M., Liang, Z., Wang, X.-L., Shi, L., Yan, B., and Zhao, T. (2024). Holistic dynamic modeling and simulation of alkaline water electrolysis systems based on heat current method. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17236202 ↗
6. Current status of membraneless water electrolysis cells10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100881 ↗
7. Dynamic modelling of alkaline self-pressurized electrolyzers: A phenomenological-based semiphysical approach10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.038 ↗
8. Advanced characterization of alkaline water electrolysis through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and polarization curves10.1016/j.jelechem.2024.118709 ↗
9. Impedance analysis of alkaline water electrolysis based on distribution of relaxation time10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.086 ↗
10. Yang, J., Zhang, J., Liu, M., Sun, J., and Shangguan, Z. (2024). Dynamic Simulation and Performance Analysis of Alkaline Water Electrolyzers for Renewable Energy-Powered Hydrogen Production. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17194915 ↗
11. Dynamic mass- and energy-balance simulation model of an industrial-scale atmospheric alkaline water electrolyzer10.1016/j.energy.2025.135602 ↗
12. Dynamic energy and mass balance model for an industrial alkaline water electrolyzer plant process10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.126 ↗
13. Water electrolysis technologies: The importance of new cell designs and fundamental modelling to guide industrial-scale development10.1039/D4EE05559D ↗
14. Jin, L., Nakashima, R.N., Frandsen, H.L., and Comodi, G. (2023). Alkaline Electrolysis for Green Hydrogen Production: Techno-Economic Analysis of Temperature Influence and Control. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems (ECOS 2023), ECOS 2023.10.52202/069564-0082 ↗
15. Control strategies for alkaline water electrolyzers: A survey10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.425 ↗
16. Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Dynamic Operation of an Alkaline Electrolyzer10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.07.184 ↗
17. Real live demonstration of MPC for a power-to-gas plant10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.144 ↗
18. Advanced frequency control schemes and technical analysis for large-scale PEM and Alkaline electrolyzer plants in renewable-based power systems10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.360 ↗
19. Franco, A., and Giovannini, C. (2023). Recent and Future Advances in Water Electrolysis for Green Hydrogen Generation: Critical Analysis and Perspectives. Sustainability, 15.10.20944/preprints202311.0109.v1 ↗
20. Qiu, X., Zhang, H., Qiu, Y., Zhou, B., Zang, T., Qi, R., and Wang, J. (2022). Online Dynamic Parameter Estimation of an Alkaline Electrolysis System Based on Bayesian Inference. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 5th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC), IEEE.10.1109/CIEEC54735.2022.9846736 ↗
21. Hydrogen Production by Water Electrolysis Technologies: A Review10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101426 ↗
22. Transient modelling of a multi-cell alkaline electrolyzer for gas crossover and safe system operation10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.184 ↗
23. Thermal modeling and controller design of an alkaline electrolysis system under dynamic operating conditions10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120551 ↗
24. Direct continuous-time approaches to system identification. Overview and benefits for practical applications10.1016/j.ejcon.2015.04.003 ↗
25. Identification of continuous-time models10.1109/78.285652 ↗
26. Perspectives on system identification10.1016/j.arcontrol.2009.12.001 ↗
27. An overview of subspace identification10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.05.045 ↗
28. Box–Jenkins identification revisited—Part I: Theory10.1016/j.automatica.2005.09.004 ↗
29. N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems10.1016/0005-1098(94)90230-5 ↗
30. Gambou, F., Guilbert, D., Zasadzinski, M., and Rafaralahy, H. (2022). A Comprehensive Survey of Alkaline Electrolyzer Modeling: Electrical Domain and Specific Electrolyte Conductivity. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15093452 ↗
31. Guidance to solid state electrochemical impedance spectroscopy10.1016/j.electacta.2025.146892 ↗
32. Malkow, T., Tsotridis, G., and Pilenga, A. (2018). EU Harmonised Test Procedure: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy for Water Electrolysis Cells, Publications Office.
33. Graphical analysis of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data in Bode and Nyquist representations10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.073 ↗
34. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy─A Tutorial10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.2c00070 ↗
35. Single-input machine learning for gas evolution in membraneless alkaline water electrolysis: A comparative study of five regressors10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152830 ↗
36. Continuous-time model identification10.1049/iet-cta.2011.9043 ↗
37. Alkaline membrane-free water electrolyser for liquid hydrogen production10.1016/j.renene.2024.121172 ↗